Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank J. Fleming (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Frank J. Fleming

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, no RS coverage. In a WP:BEFORE, I found a sole RS passing mention of Fleming on the launch of his first book. Oddly for a man with three mainstream published books, I could find zero reviews in RSes - only the publisher pages. There appears to be no evidence of independent RSes covering Fleming in depth as would be required for a BLP to exist. What little coverage of Fleming exists is in fringe non-RSes, and even those are sparse. I would be delighted to be shown wrong with solid RSes that pass a notability criterion. David Gerard (talk) 17:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and United States of America. David Gerard (talk) 17:16, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - just not finding any notable coverage, similarly to the nominator. A few passing mentions of his work, but absolutely nothing in-depth in reliable sources. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NAUTHOR. —Ganesha811 (talk) 18:50, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:40, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I could also find no secondary coverage. I was able to find a singular interview in a blog, but nothing that would contribute to GNG. Devonian Wombat (talk) 02:49, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.