Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baruch Chait

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. plicit 14:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Baruch Chait (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to pass GNG or NAUTHOR. passing mention in the RS, the other is a blog. Gugrak (talk) 09:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Blocked sock. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:26, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! gidonb (talk) 14:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 12:42, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:45, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep this article about a groundbreaking Jewish musician (who co-created the first folk/Jewish fusion band in 1967) composer, school founding rosh yeshiva/educator and prolific children's book author. The sockpuppet nominator obviously didn't bother to do any checking WP:BEFORE they nominated this. But WP:HEY, I just spent some time adding a few 3rd party reliable sources, and I haven't even gotten to the Hebrew language sources yet, which there has to be regarding this influential Israeli rabbi. I don't agree with Drmies regarding redirecting to Maarava Machon Rubin, nor even with merging there per gidonb. None of the musical or author information would fit well in the school article, and the educational info would not fare well in The Rabbis' Sons. Havradim leaf a message 11:42, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The "merging there per gidonb" was explicitly if no one would come up with a second valid source, after I had come up with the first. Someone did find more sources, so obviously I support only keep. Per WP:GNG and WP:HEY! gidonb (talk) 14:20, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.