Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ash Goldie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ash Goldie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 00:55, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment He has been a second team all-star in the ECHL and the EIHL but otherwise he is not notable for anything else. If the previously listed accomplishments are not enough to satisfy criterion #4 then I would support deletion. Deadman137 (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A Second Team All-Star would not satisfy criterion #4, the level the ECHL is at. No evidence the player meets the GNG. Ravenswing 17:43, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not pass WP:ATHLETE. Delta13C (talk) 16:09, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.