Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Philomena O'Brien

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure)‎ LibStar (talk) 09:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Philomena O'Brien

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:PROF. Could not find significant coverage. Only 3 gscholar hits. LibStar (talk) 00:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - @PMCH2: who created this article in 2021. The source listed as The Encyclopedia of Women and Leadership in Twentieth-Century Australia is pretty impressive. Also, scroll down to all the listings in the Authority Control template. It takes a bit of checking into each returned listing, but there's enough IMO. — Maile (talk) 01:34, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 07:59, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, and Women. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I think the listing in the Women and Leadership Encyclopedia is notable. Could use more sourcing, but it should be ok. Oaktree b (talk) 19:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added more published book reviews. There are enough for WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:40, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: reviews of her books in WP:RS indicate notability. PamD 08:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.