Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Stetson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Stetson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a model, not properly referenced as passing notability criteria for models. The only substantive notability claim here is that he's had modelling jobs, which is not automatically enough in and of itself, and the referencing is entirely to primary sources that aren't support for notability at all (directory entry, magazine cover appearance meta-referenced to itself rather than third-party coverage about it, etc.) with absolutely no evidence of WP:GNG-worthy media coverage about him shown at all.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 16:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.