Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Milk Cup squads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 13:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Milk Cup squads

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Whilst the tournament may just about be notable, I don't think that a separate squad article is warranted. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 12:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Competition is not noteworth enough to merit a seperate article for squads. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Giant Snowman 22:27, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A notable competition but not notable enough to justify a separate article for squad lists. Argyle 4 Life^talk 13:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Isn't the entire content of this article already in 2010 Milk Cup anyway? Which came first, this or those? If it was this we'll have to redirect it there for copyright purposes. Alzarian16 (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the article creator has pre-empted the result of the AfD and merged the squads into the main article. This appears to have been done within two hours of this AfD being started. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That probably isn't a good idea, as this doesn't seem to be heading for a merge outcome so far and is discouraged under WP:AFD. Should we revert it? Alzarian16 (talk) 18:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the tournament is notable, but there is not need for a separate squad list. --Carioca (talk) 20:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.