Jump to content

User talk:Hawkeye7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives:

2007 · 2008 · 2009 · 2010 · 2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014 · 2015 · 2016 · 2017 · 2018 · 2019 · 2020 · 2021 · 2022 · 2023 · 2024
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
RfA candidate S O N S % Status Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
Significa liberdade 144 25 11 85 Open 22:18, 21 September 2024 1 day, 7 hours no report

This Month in GLAM: July 2024

[edit]




Headlines
  • Albania report: For what matters most for your community
  • Argentina report: Mid-term digitization update
  • Brazil report: Structuring Wiki Loves Monuments through a Wikidata portal
  • Canada report: CCA Hosts Inaugural Wiki Edit-a-Thon
  • Germany report: The flight over the "Rosinenbomber" - drone deployment for Free Knowledge; Kicking off a German-language community of practice for building cultural heritage linked open data with the wikimedia projects
  • India report: GLAM partner ventures into 'Digitisation Plus' programs with Wikimedians
  • Kosovo report: Prompting what's most important - our community in Albania and Kosovo
  • New Zealand report: WikiProject International Botanical Congress 2024, a presentation to the Natural History Museum, London & Kew Gardens staff and a Research expeditions edit-a-thon
  • Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Programme
  • UK report: Translations galore
  • USA report: Wikicurious WikiNYC Civic Hall; San Diego 111; #5WomenArtists campaign
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library report: BHL-Wiki Working Group July monthly highlights
  • Special story: GLAM GLobal meetup & GLAM Global Calls
  • Calendar: August's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2024-33

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 220, August 2024

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

[edit]

Promotion of Battle of Tinian

[edit]
Congratulations, Hawkeye7! The article you nominated, Battle of Tinian, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SPARS A-Class nomination

[edit]

@Hawkeye7: The adding of sandbox, I'm srry to say, still does not allow me to nominate the SPARS article for A-Class. I hope you'll be able to help me further with the nomination. Thank you. Pendright (talk) 22:04, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have created it manually for you. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:31, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Pendright (talk) 21:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ernest J. King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Truk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for John S. McCain Sr.

[edit]

On 20 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John S. McCain Sr., which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that John S. McCain Sr. and John S. McCain Jr. (both pictured) were the first father-and-son pair to achieve the U.S. rank of four-star admiral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John S. McCain Sr.. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John S. McCain Sr.), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hook update
Your hook reached 28,190 views (1,174.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-34

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any info available on her career post 2012? LibStar (talk) 01:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She has no more international caps; that was the climax of her career. Goes by the name of Alicia Smith now. Worked for Water Polo Australia for a time. Now mostly coaches. [6][7][8][9][10] Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

David Greenglass

[edit]

Your edit to David Greenglass states "He was honorably discharged from the Army on February 29, 1946". 1946 was not a leap year. Could you check your source please? Assuming you still have access nine years on. Thanks. Cabayi (talk) 09:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm. It is what it says in his FBI file [11] (p. 11) CIA says February 1946. [12] Suggest we go with that. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least the CIA citation has the virtue of not being an imaginary date. Thanks for the speedy reply. I'll leave it to you - I'm not going to steal credit for your research. Cabayi (talk) 11:50, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have corrected the article, but since nobody checks against the Wikipedia, expect sources to continue to repeat the 29 February date. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis Lyne article

[edit]

The sentence starting with "Too young to see service during the First World War..." seemed possibly inaccurate to me. An article in War History Online https://www.warhistoryonline.com/instant-articles/the-boy-soldiers-of-wwi.html entitled "Almost 250,000 Boys Under The Age Of 18 Fought In The British Army In WWI" states that the age of enlistment was 18 and the age for service overseas was 19. Unless this is wrong or there was another condition, or I don't fully understand it, it seems Lyne was old enough to have served in the last months of WWI without even being in the large group of underage boys who served despite the age requirements. (Many were mustered out as the war progressed if their parents produced a birth certificate showing their actual age but many were also casualties.) I mention this for your consideration in case you wish to remove the phrase. My guess is that someone would question it if it were included without a further explanation. Donner60 (talk) 04:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he could have. Overseas service was consider to be leaving the UK for France, not Australia for the UK, so the AIF had an entire battalion of 18 year olds who were trained in the UK and then shipped to France as reinforcements when they reached the age of 19. In Lyne's case he did not graduate from Sandhurst until April 1919. I have re-worded the article. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 05:59, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you today for Anna Lee Fisher, about "one of the first six women selected to be astronauts by NASA in 1978. During her long and distinguished career at NASA, she was involved with the Space Shuttle, the International Space Station and the Orion spacecraft. This article is the fifth in the series about the first six women astronauts, following Sally Ride, Judith Resnik, Kathryn Sullivan and Rhea Seddon. Unlike those astronauts, Fisher has no biography, so its writing was more difficult."! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-35

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 20:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 August newsletter

[edit]

The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:

Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

[edit]

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-36

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 01:03, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

[edit]

MILHIST articles for review and GAs issue

[edit]

Hi Hawkeye7, I've spotted two issues with the MILHIST articles for review template and thought I should bring them to your notice. The template still shows 4 GARs, 1 FAC and at least 2 GACs as being active, even though all of these have been closed. Additionally, on the list of open tasks page, it still lists the Thorsten Nordenfelt FPC as being active, even though it has been closed for about 10 months now. I think there may be some issue with a bot which is still leading to these reviews being marked active.

The other issue is with the MILHIST GA list. I've recently added WPMH tags to at least 15 GAs which are under the WPMH purview but the tags were never added to them. I went through the MILHIST GA category and noticed that these were not being listed over there. I think there are 10s of such GAs which can be added to WPMH, I've yet to go through the full list. How do you think this can be fixed, will it have to be done manually? Thanks in advance and cheers Matarisvan (talk) 16:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I went through the GA category for WPMH and the recent additions have also been added there. They weren't when I last checked, but they are now. My apologies. However, the first issue is still current. Matarisvan (talk) 16:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am currently in Europe for the Paralympic Games, but will investigate when return. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 16:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hawkeye7. Since you commented on a previous FLC for this article, I'm wondering if you'd be willing to take a look at the current FLC spearheaded by The Herald and myself? We've addressed the issues in the previous FLC and I believe this article is ready. ~ Matthewrb Talk to me · Changes I've made 03:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-37

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 18:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This Month in GLAM: August 2024

[edit]




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Promotion of Lise Meitner

[edit]
Congratulations, Hawkeye7! The article you nominated, Lise Meitner, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, David Fuchs (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
story · music · places

Congratulations, and thenk you today for Frederick Browning, introduced (in 2022) as "about Boy Browning, a British Army general and Olympian who served as head of the Duke of Edinburgh's office. His wife is more famous than he is." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wheelchair rugby at the 2024 Summer Paralympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Peters.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue 221, September 2024

[edit]
Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-38

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:59, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

[edit]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gulf of Tonkin incident

[edit]

I noticed your PhD in military history among your qualifications for the upcoming military history coordinator elections. I hope the election gives you support.

On a separate issue I am hoping you might suggest interested professional historians I might contact regarding my theory about the Gulf of Tonkin incident. My interest was aroused because I experienced a similar situation aboard USS Chicago on PIRAZ station several years later. I was the officer in charge of Chicago's RIM-24 Tartar missile battery and was standing the midnight to 4 AM midwatch as the combat information center (CIC) weapons control officer. It was a quiet night until the AN/SPS-10 surface search RADAR picked up a surface contact zig-zagging toward us at about 40 knots in typical torpedo boat fashion from the direction of Haiphong. The CIC evaluator called the captain to CIC and the captain ordered general quarters. The contact was being tracked by the AN/SPS-43 air search RADAR, by the AN/SPG-49 fire control RADAR for the RIM-8 Talos missiles, and by the AN/SPG-25 RADAR of the MK 37 Gun Fire Control System. The contact was out of gun range, and the long-range Talos missiles were unable to engage surface ships. My Tartar missiles were theoretically capable of engaging a surface target at that range, but my AN/SPG-51 fire-control RADAR could not achieve the RADAR lock required to fire. The captain turned away from the contact at best possible speed, which was significantly less than 40 knots, so the contact kept closing the range.

We vectored a combat air patrol fighter out for a visual check, but the pilot was unable to see anything in the darkness. The gun fire control RADAR dropped track as the contact came within gun range, as did the other RADARs. Subsequent discussions with navy veterans indicated similar RADAR phantoms had been observed in the Gulf of Tonkin as early as the second world war. These were generally regarded as "freak weather events" although Admiral Stanley Thomas Counts suggested they may have been flocks of cormorants. I think Admiral Counts' suggestion deserves wider recognition. These black birds would be very difficult to see during hours of darkness, and might disappear from RADAR if the flock dispersed or the birds landed in the water.

While cormorants are seldom observed in flocks significantly seaward of coastal roosting trees, the Đàn boat people of the Tonkin Gulf used an unusual fishing method which offered roosting opportunities far from shore. In the vicinity of the Vietnam war PIRAZ station, three-generation families of Đàn lived aboard small sailboats tending fish traps our Navy called "fish sticks". I do not know the actual design of these traps, but they could be visually observed as a collection of bamboo poles floating semi-vertically. I speculate these poles would have offered perches for cormorants, and the cormorants would presumably have been attracted to any fish which might have been in the traps. I further speculate the Đàn might have tried to protect their catch by chasing away these flocks of cormorants, and our RADAR phantoms might have been wandering flocks of cormorants seeking another perch in the hours of darkness. Can you suggest someone who might be interested in investigating this speculation? Thewellman (talk) 02:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]