User:Bellerophon/Tools
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard.
| ||||
Template:R template index - redirect template index
|
AB = Administrative Backlogs[edit]Administrative backlog[edit]AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports[edit]
User-reported[edit]
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days: Deletion backlog {{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 9 items Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items Requested RD1 redactions – 5 items Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection Usernames for administrator attention
User-reported[edit]
Requests for page protection
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Due To Many Copy Edits By Trolls That Spread False Information On This Page, Due To the Fact That People Would Spread Lies On Lots Of Pages, This Will Not Happen On This Page Anyway Or Anyhow Quentin23J (talk) 19:36, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – In cryptocurrency genre WP:GS/CRYPTO, seems to be getting IP address promotional edits promoting something called trollcoin (no idea what that is, but unrelated). Jtbobwaysf (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced content, and removal of the one existing reference, by two new editors and an IP editor, here, here and here. Tacyarg (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism by a variety of different IPs signed, Willondon (talk) 20:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Semi-protection could be helpful. Useless IP edits during several years that were all reverted. тнояsтеn ⇔ 20:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Repeated BLP violations of WP:GENSEX arbitration level. Request raising page protection to ECP to prevent further disruption and logging of it under CTOP sanctions. Raladic (talk) 21:44, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The last few days in the edit history are a hot mess. AntiDionysius (talk) 22:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similar vandalism by multiple newly created accounts (possible socks). Lenny Marks (talk) 23:12, 8 October 2024 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing and addition of unsourced material by anonymous editors of current concert tour event. livelikemusic (TALK!) 23:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC) Reason: Persistent edit warring over a perceived typo by:
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 23:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC) Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – WP:GSCASTE, IP hopper edit warrings. ®asteem Talk 00:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP edit warring and attempts to subjectively troll, condemn or praise the film TropicAces (talk) 01:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Article recenlty came out of protection and IPs have been editing to remove material. TarnishedPathtalk 02:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long-time history of vandalism by IP addresses. dotXK 03:00, 9 October 2024 (UTC) Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continued vandalism of WP:GENSEX topic after previous protection expired. Request indef semi this time per arbitration sanctions for CTOP. Raladic (talk) 03:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Somebody keeps joking about Family Guy in this article. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 03:31, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Continued disruptive editing by registered users. Article has been previously extended protected so need a longer duration now. The topic is also affected by misinformation and fake news by Indian media. Nomian (talk) 05:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Forked from Extended confirmed protection main article The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Due to some of the buzz around the movie, the page is being persistently vandalized. Professor Penguino (talk) 07:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC) Indefinite extended confirmed protection: This is a Lebanese village very near the Israeli border - is part of the Arab-Israeli conflict contentious topic; article should be ECP. BugGhost🦗👻 07:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent unreferenced edits from IP users and newly created accounts. Hotwiki (talk) 07:37, 9 October 2024 (UTC) Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Reason: An event that has already passed, and mostly final infomation. Wikihelper910 (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because people like and specially Wikipedians want to make this page better Sig ma rehan (talk) 12:18, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: The page is factually incorrect and misinforms readers 2601:248:8481:B370:287F:D4AE:14F4:CB21 (talk) 13:22, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason: It`s been edited by someone who shouldnt have the authority to edit what was effectively an acurate page. Your "editor" has already been cited many times as being extremely biased against certain protected categories and allows his fetishes to dictate what and how he edits! 124.244.164.104 (talk) 08:02, 9 October 2024 (UTC) Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Change the death part to assassination, so then the article will be more specific to explain on that part Fredd the boy (talk) 20:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
I want to request to change the article name because clearly Israel didn't invade the whole Lebanon and it's not it intention. They said that their operation is to drive Hezbollah from south Lebanon So i want to make request to change it into 2024 israeli invasion of south lebanon أحمد توفيق (talk) 12:56, 8 October 2024 (UTC) "Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible." This is an opinion and interpretation of Zionism. You cannot present this in the opening page about Zionism since it is not one of the main aspects of Zionism at all, and not a universal aspect of Zionism and most certainly was not a priority in Zionist ideology. It was an aspiration of several factions of Zionism and was acted upon during the 1947-1949 civil war in Palestine. In her work, Manna, Adel (2022), argues for this interpretation because during the war "the principal objective of the Zionist leadership to keep as few Arabs as possible in the Jewish state" (p.2) and "in the 1948 war, when it became clear that the objective that enjoyed the unanimous support of Zionists of all inclinations was to establish a Jewish state with the smallest possible number of Palestinians" (p.4). These were war objectives and not key tenets of Zionism. Mana then goes above and beyond and claims: "The Zionists had two cherished objectives: fewer Arabs in the country and more land in the hands of the settlers" (p.33). First, this is also a war objective and not an ideological objective. You can also say the same about the other side "The Arab countries had two cherished objectives: fewer Jews in the country and more land in the hands of Arabs". While both are true, they were not a key tenet in their ideology (and I would argue that Arabs made clear they wished the land to be Jew-free more than the Jews wanted it to be Arab-free, they just couldn't act upon it because of military inferiority). Furthermore, this statement was never proven, but simply given as a fact and quoted here on Wikipedia. The Zionists main objective was to secure safe borders regardless and prevent Arab countries from occupying any land that was part of the British Mandate for Palestine. In their aim to do so, the most strategic move, was to occupy as much land and depopulate it from the civilian population that was hostile to the Jews and supportive of the Arab countries. This is not an opinion, this is a fact of war and you don't need to be a military strategist to understand the logic in that. I would suggest that you simply write "Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine". The rest of the sentence is Mana's own beliefs and thoughts and is highly disputable and a personal slander for most Zionists. You cannot write this on Wikipedia which should be a neutral ground. You can move that part to a sub-chapter and write "Many scholars today believe that Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible". This means that it is not a neutral fact and is open for debate! But if you honor your own neutrality, as you write in the Page title "Wikipedia:Neutral point of view" (All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias), then take that sentence down from the opening page and most certainly don't write it as a fact, because it isn't a fact, it isn't neutral and it is most certainly not bias. EshcharG (talk) 16:16, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
I would like to request that in the Casualties and losses section, "1,000+ Lebanese civilians killed[36]" will be removed or rephrased. That is because the article itself doesn't mention if they were civilians or fighters, while Hezbollah hasn't published official death numbers since the beeper attack. Thus we can't know how many civilians were killed - and the Al Jazeera article doesn't say it either — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.55.173.215 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests[edit]Protected edit requests
RFA= Requests for adminship RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled[edit]
GnocchiFan has made 5,000+ edits this year alone including
Meets the minimum criteria, and a random sampling of their creations doesn't raise any red flags. My only concern is their liberal use of quotations in reception sections, but I don't consider it an overly serious issue for this permission as the copyright reports come away otherwise clean; I've also started a discussion on their talk page about it. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:54, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Admins, I am requesting the Autopatrolled right to further support my contributions to Wikipedia. While I may not have thousands of edits or article creations, my work is rooted in careful research and learning from experienced editors. My focus is on Iranian early modern, modern, and contemporary art and culture, especially highlighting the stories of Iranian women often overlooked in history. I ensure all my edits are supported by reliable, academic sources, and I have a track record of accurate contributions with very few reverts. I believe that having the Autopatrolled right would allow me to continue enhancing the articles related to Iran and Iranian art and culture. Thank you for your consideration. Warm regards, Hounaam (talk) 22:53, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
I am requesting the Autopatrolled right, like any other editor, to help reduce the NPP work load. I have worked at AFC/NPP/AFD, and I've created good articles that would pass a deletion discussion if nominated. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 11:47, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
They have created 60 Japanese-related articles, the majority of which are BLPs. None of them have been deleted, and no major issues were found upon my quick checks. Thank you. GrabUp - Talk 16:40, 7 October 2024 (UTC) There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.
Page mover[edit]
I often move poorly-titled pages to more appropriate titles, usually to make them more WP:CONCISE, specific, neutral, or to correct spelling and transliterations. I also revert undiscussed moves in line with WP:RMUM. I would greatly appreciate having the ability to manage this myself. Skitash (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to get this right to delete unnecessary redirects (i.e. move pages over existing single revision redirects regardless of target). Additionally, I would also like to try to harmonize some pages of Spanish municipalities with the name of the country and the province (when necessary) instead of other subnational units (such as comarca). Moreover if a double denomination exists in some cases, I shall use the slash with spaces in between to enhance visual effect of different linguistic nomenclatures. However if an English form is more relevant I shall use it instead of double and local denominations. Other than that I could help elsewhere to move pages if necessary. Thank you, Nuvolet (talk)
i have been on wikipedia for almost 10 years, I have familiarized myself with the projects mission. Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:19, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
Hello hello, I have been a Wikipedian for well over 4 months now, and I feel that I have learned a great many things about the site in terms of editing, content, policies, and conduct that I could have never imagined beforehand. If given this right, I humbly commit to using it to the utmost competent and fair / legitimate nature that I possibly can. Thank you Aliy Dawut (talk) 02:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I have been contributing to pages for three years now, with prior experience in patrolling edit filter log. I would like to get reviewer rights so I can contribute to Wikipedia in more ways than I am able to, presently, and help with the backlog. Since my last request in July, I've been making a track record of communicating collegially with other editors, in my talk page and elsewhere. I hope you'll consider me. Thank you. — hhypeboyh 💬 • ✏️ 23:11, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been doing RC Patrolling (as a part of Anti-Vandalism) on Wikipedia for a while now, and I think that having the Pending Changes reviewer permission could be a good idea - there have been numerous instances involving a pending changes edit that I look at while looking through Special:RecentChanges that i wanted to accept/deny/etc, and i feel that this permission would be beneficial for my efficeincy. DM5Pedia 04:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I believe that I'd be a good Pending Changes Reviewer, as I have a good amount of time on my hands, and can do monotonous tasks, like denying obvious vandalism, and the like. I meet, what I believe are all the requirements for this right, and humbly ask to receive this privilege. Thanks in advance! Legendbird (talk) 09:06, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I am an Wikipedian for more than three years and part of various wikiprojects I need permission to expand my works on Wikipedia and also to observe Wikipedia articles. Cactinites (talk) 15:28, 23 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi! I've been using Wikipedia on-and-off since 2020, but I'm starting to become more active. I'd like to become a pending change reviewer, as I've often wanted to help out but have struggled finding where I can actually contribute, and I think this is a good place to contribute. I'm familiar with the guidelines, as well. Thx56 (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
To review pending changes on Wikipedia Gonzafer001 (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights: I have been a wikipedia editor for some time now and love to revert vandalism and unconstructive edits to prevent the spread of problems on wikipedia. I currently am a Recent Changes patrol and love my job! I have successfully achieved 1000 total edits (or ~ 325 mainspace edits) on the english wikipedia. I can't wait to be a pending changes reviewer, as it will allow me to stop the spread of vandalism even farther! Thanks, Cooldudeseven7 (Cheers! Let's Discuss over a cup of tea!) Celebrating 1000 Edits!
Rollback[edit]
I have been working to revert vandalism for some time now, mostly patrolling Recent changes. I have used Twinkle and RedWarn to revert vandalism and warn vandals. Rollback rights would make it easier for me to revert obvious vandalism. Thanks. Charliehdb (talk) 10:57, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
I've been editing since 2015, with almost 80K edits, and have experience patrolling recent changes such as those in my watchlist. I'm familiar with policies such as VANDAL and WARN, and regularly use appropriate edit summaries and warning templates, through the use of Twinkle and RedWarn. Having rollback rights would help me revert clear cases of vandalism more effectively. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 15:35, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I have been engaging in recent changes patrolling for some time now, so I'd like to request rollback permission primarily to be able to use tools, so that I can patrol more quickly and efficiently. Thanks. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 17:38, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I've been actively patrolling recent changes for a significant amount of time and have developed a solid understanding of Wikipedia’s guidelines on vandalism and disruptive edits. Throughout this period, I’ve consistently identified and reverted problematic edits, but doing this manually can be time-consuming. Having rollback rights would allow me to handle these issues more quickly and efficiently, helping ensure Wikipedia stays a reliable resource. I’m committed to using these tools responsibly and continuing to contribute effectively to the project. Thank you DelphiLore (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
I regularly patrol the recent changes page using filters that flag edits that may have problems or could be vandalism. With confirmed vandals, I keep an eye on their contributions for a short time afterwards to catch any resumed vandalism, while continuing to patrol recent changes. I previously used RedWarn, but I currently use UltraViolet and Twinkle. Rollback would enhance my recent change patrolling and anti-vandalism efforts. Thank you. R0paire-wiki (talk) 04:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Template editor[edit]
I already work on templates from time to time, to improve formatting, fix links, add features, etc. My record speaks for itself that I am careful in making changes. Thanks. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:27, 26 September 2024 (UTC)
Due to the chronic shortage of admins at DYK to perform prep-to-queue moves, the protection levels were recently downgraded to Template editor - really per WT:DYK#Plan of action v2 but you may wish to start at WT:DYK#Giving queues template instead of full protection? for the full context. I would like to help with this. Launchballer 16:06, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Standard Guidelines review:
Footer[edit]Policies and links |
My Tools
[edit]ACC stuff
[edit]- User:Bellerophon/Custom emails
- Wikipedia:Request an account/Guide
- Wikipedia:Username policy
- Technical restrictions on usernames
- Account creation interface login
AfC stuff
[edit]Copyright stuff
[edit]- Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations
- Wikipedia:Copyright problems
- Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations
- Remove the infringing text or revert the page to a non-copyrighted version if you can.
- The infringing text will remain in the page history for archival reasons unless the copyright holder asks the Wikimedia Foundation to remove it (unless it is tagged for {{copyvio-revdel}}. Please note the reason for removal in the edit summary and at the article's talk page (you may wish to use {{subst:cclean}}). When possible, please identify and alert the contributor of the material to the problem. The templates {{subst:Uw-copyright}} and {{subst:Uw-copyright-new}} may be used for this purpose.
- However, if all revisions have copyright problems, the removal of the copyright problem is contested, or reversion/removal is otherwise complicated:
- Replace the text with one of the following:
{{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}{{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}} - Go to today's section and add
to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you)* {{subst:article-cv|PageName}} from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~ - Advise the contributor of the material at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.
{{subst:cclean|url=}}
- Copyvio detector tool (use with caution, prone to weirdness...)
- Duplication detector tool
- User:MadmanBot/manual
Adoption stuff
[edit]- User:Bellerophon/Adoption
- User:Bellerophon/Adoption/Assignments/Questions
- {{subst:User:Bellerophon/Adoption/Welcome}}
- {{subst:User:Bellerophon/Adoption/Gradcert}}
Anti-vandal stuff
[edit]- Reflinks Tool
- User:CorenSearchBot/manual
- Wikipedia:Cv101
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Submissions
- Warning Templates
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests
- Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types
- UTM Subpages
Special pages
[edit]- List of colors
- Special:PrefixIndex/User:Pol430
- Special:PrefixIndex/User:Bellerophon
- Special:Log
- Special:AbuseLog
- Special:NewPages
- Special:NewPagesFeed
- Special:PendingChanges
- Special:RecentChanges
Quick templates
[edit]- {{subst:ANI-notice}}
- {{GOCE|user=Bellerophon|date=}}
Sister projects
[edit]Wikipedia is written by volunteer editors and hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization that also hosts a range of other volunteer projects:
-
Commons
Free media repository -
MediaWiki
Wiki software development -
Meta-Wiki
Wikimedia project coordination -
Wikibooks
Free textbooks and manuals -
Wikidata
Free knowledge base -
Wikinews
Free-content news -
Wikiquote
Collection of quotations -
Wikisource
Free-content library -
Wikispecies
Directory of species -
Wikiversity
Free learning tools -
Wikivoyage
Free travel guide -
Wiktionary
Dictionary and thesaurus