Template talk:US-mil-ship-stub

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Stub sorting This template is maintained by WikiProject Stub sorting, an attempt to bring some sort of order to Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to improve/expand the articles containing this stub notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Stub sortingWikipedia:WikiProject Stub sortingTemplate:WikiProject Stub sortingStub sorting articles United States This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Ships This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

How about United States Army vessels? Anyone have any objections to adding them as part of the stub? — Bellhalla (talk) 14:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The Air Force has ships as well... I think the wording "This article about a specific United States military ship or boat is a stub." would work best to cover all of our bases. bahamut0013^words_deeds 16:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have made the change. An alternative could also be "This article about a specific ship or boat of the United States military (Navy, Coast Guard, Army, or Air Force) is a stub." Though stub templates aren't supposed to be navigational aides like that! :P bahamut0013^words_deeds 12:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]