Jump to content

Talk:Robin Dunbar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Robin Dunbar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Robin Dunbar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Too many inline citations are cluttering the intro

[edit]

It's great to have enough refs that are valuable, relevant refs, but the citation clutter in the introduction gets in the way of reading the intro, which should be a summary of the entire article that encourages readers to read more. As to a practical to-do list, I'd say work from the references backward:

  1. See if there are any duplicate citations that aren't named yet, and then merge them. This might shorten the list of refs, and save you a lot of work. If you give the citations the same format as you go along, duplicates are easier to find, but before doing that manually, use Tools > Expand sidebar from the WP sidebar or the Citations button in the edit page of the article.
  2. Move any of the remaining citations to the part of the body text that covers the same info. Try not to clump them together.
  3. Most importantly—but needing the most effort—verify the sources, making sure they are not inappropriate for the topic or misinterpreted and fail verification for the info they claim to support. Thin them out on their merits.

This way, you'll resolve more and more of the clutter problem as you go along. For further information, I found the following helpful: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section § Citations, Wikipedia:Citation overkill, and Wikipedia:Citing sources § Bundling citations. Sorry all I can do share what I was planning on doing, but my real-life limitations are getting in the way of doing anything more. Thanks in advance to anyone who can work on this! —Geekdiva (talk) 05:36, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trimmed to a more normal number. Charles Matthews (talk) 17:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]