| dbo:abstract
|
- Ujjawal & Anr. versus State of Haryana & Ors. (2021) is a case where Punjab and Haryana High Court refused to provide protection to a same-sex couple to protect the "social fabric of the society". (en)
|
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink
| |
| dbo:wikiPageID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageLength
|
- 10379 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
|
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID
| |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
| |
| dbp:author
|
- Mahesh Chandra Tripathi , Sanjay Kumar Pachori (en)
- Dipak Misra and A.M. Khanwilkar (en)
|
| dbp:citations
| |
| dbp:court
| |
| dbp:dateDecided
| |
| dbp:decisionBy
| |
| dbp:fullName
|
- Ujjawal versus State of Haryana (en)
|
| dbp:judges
| |
| dbp:keywords
| |
| dbp:name
|
- Ujjawal v. State of Haryana (en)
|
| dbp:numberOfJudges
| |
| dbp:opinions
|
- If police protection is granted to harassed same-sex couple, social fabric of the society would get disturbed. (en)
|
| dbp:source
|
- Page 2 (en)
- Paragraph 120, Page Number 79 (en)
- Paragraph 53, Page Number 39 (en)
|
| dbp:text
|
- This Court being a constitutional Court is duty-bound to monitor and observe the Constitutional morality as well as the rights of the citizens which are under threat only on account of the sexual orientation. (en)
- The social values and morals have their space but they are not above the constitutionally guaranteed freedom. (en)
- In a constitutional democracy like ours where the rule of law prevails, [rule of law] must not be allowed to be trampled by obscure notions of social morality which have no legal tenability. (en)
|
| dbp:title
| |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate
| |
| dcterms:subject
| |
| rdfs:comment
|
- Ujjawal & Anr. versus State of Haryana & Ors. (2021) is a case where Punjab and Haryana High Court refused to provide protection to a same-sex couple to protect the "social fabric of the society". (en)
|
| rdfs:label
|
- Ujjawal v. State of Haryana (en)
|
| owl:sameAs
| |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom
| |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf
| |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects
of | |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink
of | |
| is foaf:primaryTopic
of | |
