About: Georgia v. Randolph

An Entity of Type: unit of work, from Named Graph: http://dbpedia.org, within Data Space: dbpedia.org

Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), is a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that without a search warrant, police had no constitutional right to search a house where one resident consents to the search while another resident objects. The Court distinguished this case from the "co-occupant consent rule" established in United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974), which permitted one resident to consent in absence of the co-occupant.

Property	Value
dbo:abstract	Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), is a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that without a search warrant, police had no constitutional right to search a house where one resident consents to the search while another resident objects. The Court distinguished this case from the "co-occupant consent rule" established in United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974), which permitted one resident to consent in absence of the co-occupant. (en)
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/547/103/ https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/547/103.html https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/04-1067
dbo:wikiPageID	4478537 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength	12575 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID	1124870385 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink	dbr:Canada dbr:Samuel_Alito dbr:Schmerber_v._California dbr:David_Souter dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_547 dbr:United_States_v._Matlock dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Cocaine dbr:Thornton_v._United_States dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Georgia_(U.S._state) dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Americus,_Georgia dbr:Fernandez_v._California dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Knock-and-announce dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law dbr:John_G._Roberts dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Sumter_County,_Georgia dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Spousal_abuse dbr:Illinois_v._McArthur dbr:Illinois_v._Rodriguez dbr:Certiorari dbr:Search_warrant dbr:Sergeant dbr:Totality_of_the_circumstances dbr:Originalist dbr:S.E.2d dbr:Skinner_v._Railway_Labor_Executives'_Assn. dbr:Consent_searches dbr:Justice_Antonin_Scalia dbr:U.S._LEXIS
dbp:arguedate	0001-11-08 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear	2005 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case	Georgia v. Randolph, (en)
dbp:concurrence	Stevens (en) Breyer (en)
dbp:decidedate	0001-03-22 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear	2006 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent	Thomas (en) Roberts (en) Scalia (en)
dbp:docket	4 (xsd:integer)
dbp:findlaw	https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/547/103.html
dbp:fullname	Georgia v. Scott Fitz Randolph (en)
dbp:holding	In the circumstances here at issue, a physically present co-occupant's stated refusal to permit entry prevails, rendering the warrantless search unreasonable and invalid as to him. Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed. (en)
dbp:joindissent	Scalia (en)
dbp:joinmajority	Stevens, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer (en)
dbp:justia	https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/547/103/
dbp:lawsapplied	dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants	Georgia v. Randolph (en)
dbp:majority	Souter (en)
dbp:notparticipating	Alito (en)
dbp:oyez	https://www.oyez.org/cases/2005/04-1067
dbp:parallelcitations	172800.0
dbp:prior	17280.0
dbp:uspage	103 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol	547 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate	dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Reflist dbt:Ussc dbt:US4thAmendment
dcterms:subject	dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2006_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Fourth_Amendment_case_law
rdf:type	owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCasesOfTheRobertsCourt yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase umbel-rc:Event
rdfs:comment	Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), is a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that without a search warrant, police had no constitutional right to search a house where one resident consents to the search while another resident objects. The Court distinguished this case from the "co-occupant consent rule" established in United States v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974), which permitted one resident to consent in absence of the co-occupant. (en)
rdfs:label	Georgia v. Randolph (en)
owl:sameAs	freebase:Georgia v. Randolph yago-res:Georgia v. Randolph wikidata:Georgia v. Randolph https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4kUnB
prov:wasDerivedFrom	wikipedia-en:Georgia_v._Randolph?oldid=1124870385&ns=0
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf	wikipedia-en:Georgia_v._Randolph
foaf:name	(en) Georgia v. Scott Fitz Randolph (en)
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of	dbr:Georgia_v._Scott_Fitz_Randolph dbr:Georgia_v_Randolph dbr:547_U.S._103
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of	dbr:Brigham_City_v._Stuart dbr:John_Roberts dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court dbr:United_States_v._Matlock dbr:Index_of_consent_to_search_case_law_articles dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_the_United_States dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Georgia_v._Scott_Fitz_Randolph dbr:Georgia_v_Randolph dbr:547_U.S._103 dbr:Fernandez_v._California dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Illinois_v._Rodriguez dbr:Probable_cause
is foaf:primaryTopic of	wikipedia-en:Georgia_v._Randolph