×

Hybrid tripartite randomized response technique. (English) Zbl 1384.62026

Summary: In this paper, a new randomized response technique has been proposed that combines the unrelated question randomized response technique and tripartite randomized response technique. The relative efficiency of the newly proposed Randomized Response technique over the existing Randomized Response technique was obtained. It was observed that the relative efficiency of the proposed technique over the tripartite RRT increases with increase in \(\pi_A\) and \(\pi_U\). The applicability of the proposed technique was also shown. However, it has been shown that the proposed technique performs better than the conventional ones.

MSC:

62D05 Sampling theory, sample surveys
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Adebola, F. B., and A. O. Adepetun. 2011. A new Tripartite Randomized Response Technique. Journal of the Nigerian Association of Mathematical Physics 19:119-22.
[2] Adebola, F. B., O. O. Johnson, and N. A. Adegoke. 2014. A modified stratified randomized response technique. Journal of Mathematics Theory and Modelling 4 (13):29-42
[3] Adebola, F. B., and O. O. Johnson. 2015. An improved Warner’s randomized response model. International Journal of Statistics and Applications 5 (6):263-67. doi:10.5923/j.statistics.20150506.01
[4] Cheon-Sig Lee, Stephen A. Sedory, and Sarjinder Singh. 2012. Estimating at least seven measures of qualitative variables from a single sample using randomized response technique. Statistics and Probability Letters 83:399-409. · Zbl 1341.62044
[5] Ewemooje Olusegun S., and N. Amahia Godwin. 2015. Improved randomized response technique for two sensitive attributes. Afrika Statistika 10 (2):839-52. doi:10.16929/as/2015.639.78 · Zbl 1332.62034
[6] Ewemooje, O. S., and G. N. Amahia. 2016. Improving the efficiency of randomized response technique for two sensitive characters. FUTA Journal of Research in Sciences 12 (1):65-72.
[7] Greenberg, B., A. Abul-Ela, W. Simmons, and D. Horvitz. 1969. The unrelated question randomized response model: Thereotical framework. Journal of American Statistical Association 64:529-39.
[8] Horvitz, D. G. B. V. Shah, and W. R. Simmons. 1967. The unrelated question randomized response model. Proceedings of social statistical section American statistical Association65-72.
[9] Housila P. Singh, and Tanveer A. Tarray. 2016. A sinuous stratified unrelated question randomized response model. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods doi:10.1080/03610926.2014.960588. · Zbl 1351.62040
[10] Hussain, Z., and J. Shabbir. 2007. Randomized use of Warner’s randomized response model. http://interstat.statjournals.net/YEAR/2007/articles/0704007.pdf
[11] Kim, J.-M., and W. D. Warde. 2004. A stratified Warner’s randomized response model. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 120 (1-2):155-65 · Zbl 1232.62033
[12] Mangat, N. S.1994. An improved randomized response strategy. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 56:93-95. · Zbl 0788.62013
[13] Mangat, N. S., and R. Singh. 1990. An alternative randomized response procedure. Biometrika 77:439-42. · Zbl 0713.62011
[14] Warner, S.1965. Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association 60:63-69 · Zbl 1298.62024
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.