×

Effectual topological complexity. (English) Zbl 1539.55001

In [Discrete Comput. Geom. 29 No. 2, 211–221 (2003; Zbl 1038.68130)], M. Farber introduced the concept of the topological complexity, \(\operatorname{TC}(X)\), of a topological space \(X\), which is the minimal number \(k\) such that there is a partition \(X\times X = E_1\cup\cdots \cup E_k\) admitting a continuous function \(\phi : E_i \to X^I,\,I =[0,1]\) such that \(\phi(x_0, x_1)\) is a path from \(x_0\) to \(x_1\). Later several people suggested different modifications of topological complexity, some of them in the equivariant context.
Given a group \(G\) and a \(G\)-space \(X\), the authors define an invariant \(\operatorname{TC}^G_{\mathrm{effl}}(X)\) as a section category of the fibration \(e: X^I \to X\times X/G\), and call it effectual topological complexity. Here \(e(\gamma)=(\gamma(0), [\gamma(1)])\) and \([-]\) stands for the \(G\)-orbits. Mainly, the authors compare \(\operatorname{TC}^G_{\mathrm{effl}}(X)\) with two other invariants: \(\operatorname{TC}(X/G)\) and the effective \(\operatorname{TC}^G_{\mathrm{effv}}(X)\), see [Z. Błaszczyk and M. Kaluba, Publ. Mat., Barc. 62, No. 1, 55–74 (2018; Zbl 1385.55003)].
Theorem 1.1: If \(X\) is Hausdorff and \(G\) is a discrete group acting properly discontinuously on \(X\), then \[ \operatorname{TC}^G_{\mathrm{effv}}(X)\leq \operatorname{TC}^G_{\mathrm{effl}}(X)\leq \operatorname{TC}(X/G). \] In case of \((X,G)=(T, \mathbb Z/2)\) where \((T,\mathbb Z/2)\) is 2-torus \(T\) with antipodal involution we have the following explicit calculations. Theorem 1.2: \(\operatorname{TC}^{\mathbb Z/2}_{\mathrm{effv}}(T)=2, \, \operatorname{TC}^{\mathbb Z/2}_{\mathrm{effl}}(T)=3,\, \operatorname{TC}(T/(\mathbb Z/2))=4\).

MSC:

55M30 Lyusternik-Shnirel’man category of a space, topological complexity à la Farber, topological robotics (topological aspects)
57S25 Groups acting on specific manifolds
68T40 Artificial intelligence for robotics
93C85 Automated systems (robots, etc.) in control theory

References:

[1] Błaszczyk, Z. and Kaluba, M., Effective topological complexity of spaces with symmetries,Publ. Mat.62 (2018) 55-74. · Zbl 1385.55003
[2] N. Cadavid-Aguilar and J. González, Effective topological complexity of orientable-surface groups, preprint (2020), arXiv:1907.10212v2.
[3] Cohen, D. C. and Vandembroucq, L., Topological complexity of the klein bottle,J. Appl. Comput. Topol.1 (2017) 199-213. · Zbl 1400.55001
[4] Costa, A. and Farber, M., Motion planning in spaces with small fundamental groups,Commun. Contemp. Math.12 (2010) 107-119. · Zbl 1215.55001
[5] D. M. Davis, Tables of immersions and embeddings of real projective spaces, available from https://www.lehigh.edu/\( \sim\) dmd1/imms.html.
[6] Dieck, T. T., Algebraic Topology, (Eur. Math. Soc., 2008). · Zbl 1156.55001
[7] Farber, M., Topological complexity of motion planning,Discrete Comput. Geom.29 (2003) 211-221. · Zbl 1038.68130
[8] Farber, M., Tabachnikov, S. and Yuzvinsky, S., Topological robotics: Motion planning in projective spaces,Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN2003 (2003) 1853-1870. · Zbl 1030.68089
[9] González, J., Grant, M. and Vandembroucq, L., Hopf invariants, topological complexity, and LS-category of the cofiber of the diagonal map for two-cell complexes, in Topological Complexity and Related Topics, , Vol. 702 (Amer. Math. Soc., 2018), pp. 133-150. · Zbl 1388.55003
[10] Pavešić, P., Topological complexity of a map,Homology Homotopy Appl.21 (2019) 107-130. · Zbl 1426.55004
[11] Spanier, E. H., Algebraic Topology (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966). · Zbl 0145.43303
[12] Whitehead, G. W., Elements of Homotopy Theory, , Vol. 61 (Springer-Verlag, 1978). · Zbl 0406.55001
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.