×

Price signaling and the strategic benefits of price rigidities. (English) Zbl 1180.91143

Summary: We analyze trade between a perfectly informed price setting party (seller) and an imperfectly informed price taker (buyer). Differently from most of the literature, we focus on the case in which, under full information, it would be inefficient to trade goods of sufficiently poor quality. We show that the unique equilibrium surviving D1 is characterized by market breakdown, although trade would be mutually beneficial in some state of nature. This occurs independently of the precision of the information available to the buyer. The model thus implies that signaling through prices may exacerbate the effect of adverse selection rather than mitigate it. Under D1, the seller would always benefit from committing to prices that do not reveal her information. We develop this intuition by analyzing the strategic advantages of price rigidities. We show that price rigidities help restore trade and could even enhance effectiveness of prices as signals of quality.

MSC:

91B26 Auctions, bargaining, bidding and selling, and other market models
91B44 Economics of information
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Adriani, F.; Deidda, L. G., Prce signaling and the strategic benefits of price rigidities, Mimeo · Zbl 1180.91143
[2] Akerlof, G. A., The market for “lemons”: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism, Quart. J. Econ., 84, 488-500 (1970)
[3] Bagwell, K., Optimal export policy for a new-product monopoly, Amer. Econ. Rev., 81, 1156-1169 (1991)
[4] Bagwell, K.; Riordan, M. H., High and declining prices signal product quality, Amer. Econ. Rev., 81, 224-239 (1991)
[5] Benabou, R.; Tirole, J., Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, Rev. Econ. Stud., 70, 489-520 (2003) · Zbl 1065.91068
[6] Bester, H.; Ritzberger, K., Strategic pricing, signalling, and costly information acquisition, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 19, 1347-1361 (2001)
[7] Cremer, J., Arm’s length relationships, Quart. J. Econ., 110, 275-295 (1995) · Zbl 0831.90041
[8] Cho, I. K.; Kreps, D. M., Signaling games and stable equilibria, Quart. J. Econ., 102, 179-221 (1987) · Zbl 0626.90098
[9] Ellingsen, T., Price signals quality: The case of perfectly inelastic demand, Int. J. Ind. Organ., 16, 43-61 (1997)
[10] Grossman, S. J.; Perry, M., Perfect sequential equilibrium, J. Econ. Theory, 39, 97-119 (1986) · Zbl 0616.90100
[11] Kessler, A. S., Revisiting the lemons market, Int. Econ. Rev., 42, 25-41 (2001)
[12] Kranton, R. E., Competition and the incentive to produce high quality, Economica, 70, 385-404 (2003)
[13] Jullien, B.; Mariotti, T., Auction and the informed seller problem, Games Econ. Behav., 56, 225-258 (2005) · Zbl 1177.91079
[14] Laffont, J.-J.; Maskin, E., Monopoly with asymmetric information about quality, Europ. Econ. Rev., 31, 483-489 (1987)
[15] Levin, J., Information and the market for lemons, RAND J. Econ., 32, 657-666 (2001)
[16] Mailath, G. J.; Okuno-Fujiwara, M.; Postlewaite, A., Belief-based refinements in signaling games, J. Econ. Theory, 60, 241-276 (1993) · Zbl 0788.90082
[17] Mailath, G. J.; Nöldeke, G., Does competitive pricing cause market breakdown under extreme adverse selection?, J. Econ. Theory, 140, 97-125 (2008) · Zbl 1136.91398
[18] Milgrom, P.; Roberts, J., Price and advertising signals of product quality, J. Polit. Economy, 94, 796-821 (1986)
[19] Ottaviani, M.; Prat, A., The value of public information in monopoly, Econometrica, 69, 1673-1683 (2001) · Zbl 1045.91017
[20] Overgaard, P. B., Price as a signal of quality: A discussion of equilibrium concepts in signalling games, Europ. J. Polit. Economy, 9, 483-504 (1993)
[21] Voorneveld, M., Weibull, J.W., 2005. A scent of lemon. Mimeo; Voorneveld, M., Weibull, J.W., 2005. A scent of lemon. Mimeo · Zbl 1311.91104
[22] Wilson, C., Equilibrium and adverse selection, Amer. Econ. Rev., 69, 313-317 (1979)
[23] Wilson, C., The nature of equilibrium in markets with adverse selection, Bell J. Econ., 11, 108-130 (1980)
[24] Zbaracki, M. J.; Ritson, M.; Levy, D.; Dutta, S.; Bergen, M., Managerial and customer costs of price adjustment: Direct evidence from industrial markets, Rev. Econ. Statist., 86, 514-533 (2004)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.