Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Leigh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete without prejudice. Poorly sourced BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:09, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Michael Leigh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The-Pope (talk) 14:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Leigh was one of the artists interviewed by Ruud Janssen for the book Mail-Interviews - Part 1. He is also mentioned in the book Eternal network: a mail art anthology, University of Calgary Press, 1995, p. 259, ISBN 9781895176278. However, it is just a passing mention, as well as this article published by Tate Etc. That's all I found and I don't think it is enough to meet our notability standards. Weak delete. I'm willing to change my opinion if someone presents a better evidence of notability. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 05:01, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:40, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.