Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jack Coppit

Jack Coppit (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

• Lp9mm8g (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) ( Clerk note: original case name)

• TwinkleStarzz (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility · Interaction Timeline · SPI Tools

Two accounts created within a 10 day window very recently. The first iteration proposes deletion of a politically charged article[1], but soon gives up in light of having 4 of their 5 total edits like this reverted. Soon after, TwinkleStarzz (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) surfaces, proposes deletion again, and almost suceeds by making basically the exact same arguments and using the same style of writing.

A check for sleepers would surely be justified considering that there are ongoing discussions (e.g. Deletion Review) related to this highly controversial article that the puppet master may attempt influencing. Biohistorian15 (talk) 21:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• TwinkleStarzz is seemingly Jack Coppit (talk · contribs). Lp9 is  Unrelated. Blocking and moving. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 06:07, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]