Proven Recruiting’s Post

Relying too heavily on ChatGPT or similar AI tools during an interview can indeed give a bad impression. Here are a few reasons why: 1. Perception of Authenticity: Interviewers may feel that responses generated by AI lack the personal touch and authenticity of genuine human interaction. 2. Question of Competence: Heavy reliance on AI could suggest to interviewers that the candidate may not have the necessary knowledge or skills to answer questions independently. 3. Lack of Spontaneity: Interviews often test a candidate's ability to think on their feet. Using AI might make responses seem rehearsed or scripted. 4. Dependability Concerns: Employers might worry that a candidate who relies on AI for answers may not be dependable in situations where quick, independent decision-making is required. To make a good impression, it’s important to prepare thoroughly for interviews, showcasing your own knowledge, skills, and personality. AI tools can be helpful for practice and research, but during the actual interview, genuine, thoughtful, and personal responses are key.

AI and Your Hiring: Navigating the Use of ChatGPT in Recruitment I’ve avoided adding to the deluge of hype about AI but a recent discussion about candidates’ use made me think. At heart is the candidate cheating, what is cheating and does it matter? 👉 Defining the Boundaries of AI Assistance Where does AI cheating start? Helping with a CV? Helping with potential questions? Helping with answers? Helping with a presentation? Helping with a technical assessment? Helping with post-interview emails? Is it sensible preparation if it’s pre-interview, but cheating if it’s during the interview? What’s the difference between sensible Googling and research pre-interview and getting ChatGPT to do the legwork? 👉 The Integrity Question What IS cheating anyway? If the candidate were actually in the job, you'd want them to use all the resources available to them, and it would be a red flag if they didn’t or couldn’t. But somehow, using those resources to get the job in the first place is cheating? Is this an integrity matter? It’s fine if they tell you during the selection process but not if they keep quiet? If so, what do you want them to tell you? Every use of ChatGPT? Every Google search? 👉 The Role of Technology in Hiring Is it cheating to use ChatGPT to help write a CV but not to use spellcheck (also cheating surely)? What other technologies are acceptable and when? Ultimately, the key test of course is what will enable an employer to identify the best candidate who will be most effective in the job and a reliable and honest team member. If that's what you want! If this involves key real-time skills (technical, personal, or otherwise) that we don’t want the applicant to use external support for (why?) , how do we incorporate this into our assessment process? 👉 Conclusion: Embracing a Balanced Perspective I’m not sure I have the answer yet, BUT what I am sure of is that this is already happening—a lot. And employers need to have an enterprise-wide view on what is acceptable and what is not. It’s definitely not a subject that can be left to a hiring manager’s gut feel. #managementconsulting #careers #hiring

Interesting post from Chris Sale considering whether it is acceptable for candidates to use AI to help with job applications: writing a CV, preparing presentations, interview responses etc. How much use of AI is too much in this context? #hiring #managementconsulting #jobapplication https://lnkd.in/e7wxqtdh

My friend recently interviewed someone who was using ChatGPT during the interview. There were two different candidates and two different interviews. With the first candidate, he gave a problem statement and asked them to solve in anyway they can. The candidate asked if they could use ChatGPT. My friend agreed but asked them to share their screen as they did that and asked them to explain the line of code given by ChatGPT. This interview went well, and the candidate got good scores on problem understanding and solving. With the second candidate, he first asked for some basic lines of code. The candidate gave complex and lengthy answers to that. Then my friend asked some theoretical questions. The candidate repeated the question for confirmation and then gave the answer, but it seemed evident that they were reading it out from somewhere. My friend asked the next question to chat GPT and then asked the candidate the same question. It was uncanny; no modifications at all. He did the same for another question. While the candidate was in the middle of answering, my friend completed the rest of the sentence as written by ChatGPT. The candidate did not understand what happened. The result of the interview was clear. Should we think about this?: 1- How much dependent is too much dependent on GenAI? 2- How common is common sense? 3- While AI gets more intelligent by the second, how are we doing the same, or are we?

" You know you can tap into the AI powers of ChatGPT to help you become a stand out job applicant? The secret lies not in WHAT you ask, but HOW you ask it. You can use ChatGPT to help you create an application that stands out from the crowd and grabs the attention of potential employers. Here’s the specific prompt you could use: 👉 “You’re a career coach. I’m applying for this role:” Paste job description, then hit ‘enter’. Then type, 👉 “Below is the experience section from my resume. Rephrase my experiences to showcase my relevant skills for this role, and organize information in a way that is easy to read. Include keywords that are specific to the job description and industry.” Then paste your experience (excluding personal details) and hit ‘enter’. And voila, you just got yourself a personal resume coach! Grab my Job Search Bundle for help you with interview prep - it’s 100% free. It comes with three resources: (1) 5 ChatGPT prompts to become a standout job applicant, (2) my Ultimate Salary Negotiation Guide, & (3) 40+ question Résumé checklist. ▶️ Grab the free resources here 👇 https://lnkd.in/gaiz7mSu What are your thoughts on using generative AI to help with resumes, cover letters, and even interview preparation? There are a lot of diverse views – I’d love to hear your perspective. _______ NOTE: Important things to keep in mind: –For privacy reasons, don't reveal any personal details (e.g. name or address). –Treat the generated content as a reference only. Verify accuracy and rephrase in your unique style. " --Source : https://lnkd.in/gMV2_Wii

I've gotten a lot of questions lately about AI - namely, am I worried about people using ChatGPT to prepare for interviews or to write their resumes, and I think my answer has surprised people - Absolutely not! I hope people do! Folx from Ivy League schools have people that perfect their resumes and help them practice for interviews so that they give polished answers and do well, so why shouldn't someone who hasn't attended Harvard or Yale have a similar advantage? Also, honestly, it makes my life so much easier reading well organized resumes and having folx give succinct and well constructed responses in interviews, so if ChatGPT helps people to show off their experience and skills and the right people get hired for jobs - I encourage them to do so! We hire based on competencies and incorporate work samples, role plays, and scenarios throughout our interview processes, so we assess in ways that ChatGPT can't write a script for, but I think everyone deserves to feel prepared and ready for an interview process. A resume is just your foot in the door and shouldn't determine your candidacy in a selection process. How do others feel about job seekers using ChatGPT and other AI tech to support their job searches?

Whether you are a veteran or new to the job market, performing at your highest levels should always be your goal. The latest tool available to both the interviewer and interviewee is artificial intelligence. The AI can provide a laundry list of questions and appropriate responses. However, you can’t fake real-life experience with veterans to the hiring process. They can see through your vale, so use ChatGPT (or Google's Bard) wisely. By exploring how AI can help you in your interviews, you will inevitably brush up on tucked-away knowledge and be better prepared to present your best version of yourself.Certainly! Here's the revised text: Whether you are a veteran or new to the job market, your goal should always be to perform at your highest level. Artificial intelligence is the latest tool available to both the interviewer and interviewee. AI can provide a wide range of questions and appropriate responses. However, you can’t fake real-life experience in the hiring process. Employers can see through any deception, so use ChatGPT (or Google's Bard) wisely. By exploring how AI can help you in your interviews, you will inevitably refresh your knowledge and be better prepared to present the best version of yourself.

Why do candidates cheat with ChatGPT during an interview? This is something I just can’t get over since it’s quite visible over the video feed. The eye movement (at times entire head movement) to read lines off another screen, the reflections of the second screen, typing on a keyboard and incoherence of responses are just obvious giveaways. Do I terminate the interview immediately? No. I give them a chance to see how extensively they use the tools. Pulling up references to a topic or clarification is ok by me, however completely depending on a tool like that to read every sentence and response is just silly. The tool exists to help us, not replace us. I don’t expect candidates to know everything, but I’d like to have a conversation with them. By all means, use it for clarification if needed or to jog your memory (interviews are limited in duration anyway!), but I’m more interested in hearing their views from experience; it isn’t an exam. Also, I’d love it if candidates asked for clarification than depend on AI for it. There’s a difference between Engineering your way through interviews and sounding like a puppet. Just think of it this way: if you do get hired, it’s on you to deliver. Honesty and integrity goes a long way. What’s your take?

AI won't replace Recruiters. But Recruiters who leverage AI will replace those who don't. Here are a handful of different ways you can integrate AI to streamline most stages of a search. - Job Descriptions: Generative AI can help you create a skeleton of a job description from a handful of bullets. - Intake Calls & Search Kickoff Calls: AI note-taking and summarization tools help you capture everything from the call. Reviewing the transcripts helps you identify the nuances and repeated themes that will speed up your search. - Outreach: ChatGPT can help you create email hooks, outreach ideas, and messaging templates. [*Note - don’t copy/paste ChatGPT responses. The output is impressive, but it still reads like it was written by robots. Use AI to generate drafts and ideas, then edit to match your style and approach]. - Interviews: Use an interview recording software. Many will produce an AI transcript of the conversation, allowing you to search for key information. Companies like BrightHire go a step further and use AI to consolidate your interview notes. - Interview Notes: If you’re not recording your interviews, AI can still help to clean up your notes. Ask ChatGPT to organize them - look for a theme, develop a summary, or bucket your thoughts into pros and cons. - Summarizing Feedback: Take raw notes from your stakeholders and ask AI to summarize. This will help make the feedback you share with candidates more coherent. For the time being, you'll still have to negotiate and close both sides. But leveraging AI at nearly every other stage will make you a more efficient and effective Recruiter.

The rise of generative AI, particularly Large Language Models (LLM) like ChatGPT, have introduced a whole new way for candidates to cheat, posing a serious threat to the fairness and validity of online assessments. Leveraging Sapia.ai’s vast proprietary dataset of over 12 million human-written interview answers in training this detector (over 1.0 billion words), our detector capitalizes on a subtle distinction to identify responses that may have been generated by AI rather than the candidate. Our world-first innovation - an AGC detection model is achieving a very high accuracy (ROC-AUC of 94.49%). Read more here #innovation #hiring #trustinAI https://lnkd.in/g73Py7UQ