Dan Price’s Post

View profile for Dan Price, graphic

Founder, Gravity Payments

Peloton just laid off 400 people as part of a plan to save $200 million. When they hired the CEO they gave him a pay package of $168 million. He just got ousted. Someone who is good at math please help me understand

Amy Strutt

Communications + Change Management + Enablement Leader | Creating engaging and impactful global plans and programs

4mo

This is so common in corporate America. #broken

Rohin Sharma

Senior Product & Business Strategy Leader | Growth Mindset | Value Creation | Strategic Leadership | Innovation

4mo

Recent layoffs in the name of cost cutting at many companies are a difficult reality for impacted employees. It's important to ensure cost cutting measures are implemented fairly and with a focus on long-term sustainability. If cost cutting is the need of the hour, then fat paychecks and bonuses, extensive executive travel, customer/client events and other luxuries that should be the first thing to be shelved than people's jobs.

Dana Morrow

Software Engineer II at Cars.com

4mo

Those people that got laid off will be scrambling for work. The ousted CEO is ok to never work again. This is infuriating

Jason C. Curtis

Sr Manager, Business innovation & Transformation | Driving Operational Excellence, Innovative Project Management & Process Improvement to Enhance Customer & Business Value

4mo

What's frustrating is how a large percentage of companies are immediately incentivized financially when employees are laid off. The stock price quickly increases in value, when the culprit of a failed plan, idea or strategy, requiring cost cutting measures, was many times due to a Management failure. Wouldn't it be interesting if the stock price consistently decreased after lay-offs? I say this as a Manager myself. Many companies tout loyalty and talk about the importance of their people but when difficult times present themselves, reducing head-count appears to be a go to solution all too often. If there was a strong culture in place and if people truly were the top priority, how many organizations would consider alternative ways to cut costs first such as. -Incorporate PTO donation where employees can donate PTO to another employee -Reduce or freeze bonuses at all levels within the organization -Freeze all salaries temporarily -Reduce OT -Offer Voluntary unpaid leave. I know employees that took out a loan against their 401k to fund their leave. -Retrain employees and redeploy them when possible to other more essential areas that are in higher demand If everyone is in it together, it's amazing how creative we can be.

Can Tiryakioglu, PMP

Seasoned M&A Integration and Carve-out Specialist | Program Manager | Transformation Leader | Creating Value Through M&A Transactions and Strategic Transformation Programs

4mo

Somebody needs to say stop to failing CEOs of USA getting paid so much. How can people change corporate America? It's going to be hugely difficult but it's just necessary at this point.

Maximillian K. H.

Podcast Enthusiast | Workforce Development | Business Development Specialist | Financial Analyst | Published Contributing Author

4mo

Another example of why you can’t trust your career and well being to a corporate employer. Some greedy executive will get his/her hands on most of the pie and leave the people who do the work holding the bag. We’ve seen this story countless times. America does not support or reward labor. Only capital.

Larry Rosenman

Senior Member of Technical Staff

4mo

It's the greed leading the greed.

Trish Ruff-Cunningham

Expert strategic team builder.

4mo

Math and legalized theft are two different topics.

Tylor Arndt

Empowering building highly scalable, big data and systems software is my passion

4mo

Most CEOs are over comped relative to the value they bring to the table. That being said without knowing the form of compensation this was it's hard to really understand it. I highly doubt most of the dollar amount was in base salary, or even bonuses, but rather in stock or stock options. The assumption of stock options is that if you give it to your new CEO when they start, that is where the strike price starts from and they have an incentive to improve the company and raise the value of their stock options. This is a nice idea in theory, but I think this ends up often being a perverse incentivization as it drives short-term outlooks. If the options had a long vesting period of say a decade I think we might see them actually encourage the right behavior.

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics