User talk:Trappist the monk

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

CS1

This user is responsible for those
CS1 error messages (help).

Comments are welcome. If your comments are about my work on a particular article, please make
them at the article's talk page so that everyone who has an interest in the article may participate.

To stop Monkbot, add a message to its talk page. Comments and questions about Monkbot are welcome here.

TB

Hello, Trappist the monk. You have new messages at Template talk:Cite Google Maps.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

EXPECTUNUSEDTEMPLATE magic word not needed when Template:subst only is present

I'm curious about this edit and similar ones. That magic word is typically used to keep template pages off of the unused template report, but pages that have {{subst only}} or {{transclusionless}} in their documentation should never appear on the report. Were you motivated to add the magic words by the templates' appearance on a report? – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I whined at phabricator about the dearth of documentation. There was some improvement but, such as it is, the documentation makes no mention of {{subst only}} or {{transclusionless}}. So, I added the magic word to those translator templates so that I will never need to defend their existence at some future WP:TFD.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 18:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for USS Texas (BB-35)

USS Texas (BB-35) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Note: I have also requested MILHIST A-Class reappraisal. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:43, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advice please

You came up on the list of Recently Active Admins. There is an IP user, 82.4.208.76 who has been repeatedly making misleading edits to a number of pages. Usually he/she reverses the edit a few hours later. It's mischievous and potentially mislead. But is it vandalism? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/82.4.208.76

Thanks, Bob (talk) 19:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, monitoring editor behaviour is not my area of expertise. You would do better to find an admin who does that sort of thing regularly.

—Trappist the monk (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]