Jump to content

User talk:Mgbo120

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user uses Twinkle to fight vandalism.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mgbo120 (talk | contribs) at 18:03, 28 March 2019 (→‎Pomio Kivung). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.



Jose A. Tejedor Sources

Hello,

I was wondering how I could improve my sources for the article. One is from the museum in Spain where the painting is on display, and the other is a book where on page 5 it shows the winning painting. Apologies as they are rather Unintuitive, is there anyway to remedy that?

Thank you! Banjonosepicker (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Banjonosepicker, try searching on news media. The current references you have there are not good enough to scale the page through. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 18:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just wondering why my edit on the draft Analena Jentsch page was declined when the Emira Abbes page has the same amount of references. Thanks

Try adding more references.~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:08, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I know I’m just asking why the Emira Abbes page that has the same references is a page when the Draft:Analena Jentsch page isn’t. Thanks TracyFleuryFan (talk) 19:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question about review process for Draft:Electromagnetic Radio Frequency Convergence

Hey,

Thanks for your comment on the wiki page for electromagnetic RF convergence. I beleive I have addressed your comment (and added citations to the lead section). I am not all too familiar with the review process and wanted to know what the next steps are. Do I wait for you or another reviewer to review the page? Also do I leave your comment up and wait for someone to remove it or do I simply remove it? I'd appreciate any information or help you could provide.

Thanks Achiriya (talk) 00:38, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Achiriya Good job. it will be reviewed by any reviewer. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 19:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tiamat's Wrath - two versions

Hello -- it appears that shortly after you moved the article on Tiamat's Wrath to draftspace: Draft:Tiamat's Wrath, I re-started the article in the main article space: Tiamat's Wrath without having known about the prior version. I believe that my version is adequately sourced (please feel free to check me on that). Do you have any suggestion on how to prevent folks from working on the draft while the main article exists? Delete the draft? Something else? Thanks! -Kenirwin/(talk) 01:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pomio Kivung

By what standard did you consider the article on Pomio Kivung to be undersourced? There are two, thorough, academic-quality sources cited, with inlines for both. Do I need more inlines? I’d firmly disagree if you mean that there need to be more than two academic sources for this rather obscure religious phenomenon. Kielbasa1 (talk) 19:27, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kielbasa1, Try adding more refs to boost the page. From my judgement, the refs you have are not enough.~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 18:03, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm SportingFlyer. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sabzak Pass, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SportingFlyer T·C 23:59, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]