Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eyetap: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:44, 1 September 2009

Eyetap

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product. — Dæ dαlus^Contribs 22:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Poorly sourced. Alexius08 (talk) 00:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You guys just want to delete it because it's cool. Yes it could use some better sources but deleting it won't solve anything. Find sources and add them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.183.232.130 (talk) 01:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On the fence: if it had better sources (and no, I don't have time to look for any at the moment), I'd say keep, because it sounds like a perfectly notable article. The issue is solely its lack of sources, not its lack of notability (or if anyone has any notability issues, they haven't made them knowsn, so it defaults to the same thing.) --Alinnisawest,^{Dalek Empress} (extermination requests here) 21:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 05:53, 1 September 2009 edit David Eppstein (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 222,907 edits m cat ← Previous edit		Revision as of 21:44, 1 September 2009 edit undo Alinnisawest (talk \| contribs) Pending changes reviewers 2,977 edits keep with better sources Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	You guys just want to delete it because it's cool. Yes it could use some better sources but deleting it won't solve anything. Find sources and add them. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/207.183.232.130\|207.183.232.130]] ([[User talk:207.183.232.130\|talk]]) 01:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		You guys just want to delete it because it's cool. Yes it could use some better sources but deleting it won't solve anything. Find sources and add them. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/207.183.232.130\|207.183.232.130]] ([[User talk:207.183.232.130\|talk]]) 01:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			*'''On the fence''': if it had better sources (and no, I don't have time to look for any at the moment), I'd say '''keep''', because it sounds like a perfectly notable article. The issue is solely its lack of sources, not its lack of notability (or if anyone has any notability issues, they haven't made them knowsn, so it defaults to the same thing.) --[[User:Alinnisawest\|Alinnisawest]],<sup>[[Special:Contributions/Alinnisawest\|<font color="black">'''Dalek Empress'''</font>]]</sup> ([[User talk:Alinnisawest\|<font color="#cf0021">'''extermination requests here]]'''</font>) 21:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)