Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82541.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082541. eCollection 2013.

A social network analysis of social cohesion in a constructed pride: implications for ex situ reintroduction of the African lion (Panthera leo)

Jackie Abell  1 , Morgan W B Kirzinger  2 , Yvonne Gordon  3 , Jacqui Kirk  4 , Rae Kokeŝ  4 , Kirsty Lynas  3 , Bob Mandinyenya  3 , David Youldon  4
Affiliations

A social network analysis of social cohesion in a constructed pride: implications for ex situ reintroduction of the African lion (Panthera leo)

Jackie Abell et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Animal conservation practices include the grouping of captive related and unrelated individuals to form a social structure which is characteristic of that species in the wild. In response to the rapid decline of wild African lion (Panthera leo) populations, an array of conservational strategies have been adopted. Ex situ reintroduction of the African lion requires the construction of socially cohesive pride structures prior to wild release. This pilot study adopted a social network theory approach to quantitatively assess a captive pride's social structure and the relationships between individuals within them. Group composition (who is present in a group) and social interaction data (social licking, greeting, play) was observed and recorded to assess social cohesion within a released semi-wild pride. UCINET and SOCPROG software was utilised to represent and analyse these social networks. Results indicate that the pride is socially cohesive, does not exhibit random associations, and the role of socially influential keystone individuals is important for maintaining social bondedness within a lion pride. These results are potentially informative for the structure of lion prides, in captivity and in the wild, and could have implications for captive and wild-founder reintroductions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Sociograms for all networks in the Ngamo pride (including cubs).
Sociograms illustrating the networks for A) play, B) greeting, C) social licking, D) all social interactions combined, and E) group composition for the Ngamo pride when cubs are included in the dataset and analysis. Line thickness represents the strength of the association between dyads. Circles represent female lions and squares represent male lions. The size of the circle or square is directly proportional to the age of the individual; larger shapes denote older individuals.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Clique analysis for Ngamo pride (including cubs).
Clique analysis illustrating the sub-groups present in the networks for A) play, B) greeting, C) social licking, D) all social interactions combined, and E) group composition. Circles represent individual lions and triangles indicate the cliques they are involved in.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sociograms for all networks in the Ngamo pride (excluding cubs).
Sociograms illustrating the A) play, B) greeting, C) social licking, D) all social interactions combined, and E) group composition for the Ngamo pride when cubs are excluded from the dataset and analysis. Line thickness represents the strength of the association between dyads.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Clique analysis for all networks in the Ngamo pride (excluding cubs).
Clique analysis illustrating the sub-groups present in the networks for A) play, B) greeting, C) social licking, D) all social interactions combined, and E) group composition. Circles represent individual lions and triangles indicate the cliques they are involved in.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Killian PJ, Bothma J du P (2003) Notes on the social dynamics and behaviour of reintroduced lions in the Welgevonden Private Game Reserve. South African Journal of Wildlife Game Reserve 33(2): 119–124.
    1. Trinkel M, Ferguson N, Reid A, Reid C, Somers M (2008) Translocating lions into an inbred lion population in the Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, South Africa. Animal Conservation 11: 138–143.
    1. Riggio J, Jacobson A, Dollar L, Bauer H, Becker M, et al.. (2012) The size of savannah: A lion’s (Panthera leo) view. Biodiversity Conservation: DOI 10.1007/s10531-012-0381-4. - DOI
    1. Bauer H, Nowell K, Packer C (2008) Panthera leo. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Switzerland: Gland. Available: http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 31 July 2013.
    1. Abell J, Kokeŝ R, Youldon D (2013a) The long-term viability of current lion conservation strategies: A role for ex situ reintroduction. Open Science Repository Natural Resources and Conservation Online: doi:10.7392/openaccess.70081975. - DOI

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.

LinkOut - more resources