Jump to content

Stewards/Elections 2020/Votes/MusikAnimal: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki
Browse history interactively
← Older editNewer edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Voted yes
Voted yes
Line 137: Line 137:
# {{Se-vote|2020|Aschmidt|checked=e|cb=xaosflux}} [[User:Aschmidt|Aschmidt]] ([[User talk:Aschmidt|talk]]) 20:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2020|Aschmidt|checked=e|cb=xaosflux}} [[User:Aschmidt|Aschmidt]] ([[User talk:Aschmidt|talk]]) 20:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2020|Awesome Aasim|checked=|cb=}} Trusted user on English Wikipedia. [[User:Awesome Aasim|<span style="color:green;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Awesome Aasim|<span style="color:blue;" title="Check my status before pinging or posting to my talk page!">Aasim</span>]] 23:09, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2020|Awesome Aasim|checked=|cb=}} Trusted user on English Wikipedia. [[User:Awesome Aasim|<span style="color:green;">Awesome</span>]] [[User talk:Awesome Aasim|<span style="color:blue;" title="Check my status before pinging or posting to my talk page!">Aasim</span>]] 23:09, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
# {{Se-vote|2020|Gryllida|checked=|cb=}} Technically competent, persistent, committed contributor. [[User:Gryllida|Gryllida]] 00:11, 13 February 2020 (UTC)


==== {{sr-heading|no}} ====
==== {{sr-heading|no}} ====

Revision as of 00:11, 13 February 2020

Warning

The 2020 steward elections are finished. No further votes will be accepted.

MusikAnimal

ContentsYes • No • Neutral
  • Languages: en-N, es-3
  • Personal info: (English)
    Hello! I'm MusikAnimal. I've been an active contributor for about six years. My home wiki is the English Wikipedia, where I serve as an administrator and CheckUser. I also hold sysop rights here on Meta, and global abusefilter-helper and interface editing rights. My expertise is counter-vandalism, particularly high-profile vandalism and fighting long-term abuse. Over the past year especially, a lot of this abuse has involved multiple wikis, so I am in a position now where I think stewardship would be helpful. In addition, I devote considerable time to developing tools, bots and gadgets, and I suspect stewardship will bring such contributions once I see ways to improve various workflows.

    I admittedly am not currently very active at stewardship venues here on Meta, but I do hope to help out at SRG which often seems backlogged. As it is I tend to be very busy fighting vandalism through my work with AbuseFilter and patrolling recent changes, and I suspect this by itself will keep me busy as a steward. I am readily available on IRC and will be able to tend to urgent requests there.

    I am a native English speaker, with an aspiring fluency in Spanish. I do hope to contribute more to Spanish projects as my skills improve.

    Full disclosure: I work for the WMF as a software engineer. I'd like to offer assurance that there is no detrimental crossover between this role and my potential stewardship. As explained in a few questions, should I find myself in a position where there could be a conflict of interest, I would simply recuse myself. However, I doubt this will be commonplace as my focus has always been counter-vandalism where presumably little would be put into question. It is my passion for the mission that led to my employment, and I hope this decision won't inhibit the greater passion I have as a volunteer.

    Thank you for your consideration, — MusikAnimal talk 20:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Questions: See Stewards/Elections 2020/Questions#MusikAnimal


Yes

  1. Rschen7754 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Support. Good experience with CU, has done a lot of work crosswiki with countervandalism and AbuseFilters. Rschen7754 14:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Ajraddatz (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Good experience, both on the technical and community sides. Would be a valuable addition to the team. – Ajraddatz (talk) 14:08, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. 4nn1l2 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  4nn1l2 (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Srdjan m (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Srdjan m (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. 1997kB (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Yes, satisfied with their answers. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. -revi (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  User:-revi/SEV — regards, Revi 14:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. TonyBallioni (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  TonyBallioni (talk) 14:15, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  8. 5LZ (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  5LZ 14:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Martin Urbanec (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Thanks for your work. Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Huji (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Huji (talk) 14:17, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Minorax (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Fair enough. Minorax (talk) 14:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Ammarpad (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  All-round competent candidate. – Ammarpad (talk) 14:24, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  13. RhinosF1 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Trusted, active helpful RhinosF1 (talk) 14:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Zoranzoki21 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Zoranzoki21 (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Camouflaged Mirage (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  The AF argument swing me to support. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Daimona Eaytoy (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Definitely yes: kind, skilled, and helpful. Daimona Eaytoy (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  17. 94rain (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  94rain Talk 14:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Richardkiwi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Richardkiwi (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  19. MarcoAurelio (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  —MarcoAurelio (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Count Count (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Very competent candidate. Count Count (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Stryn (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Stryn (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  22. Jianhui67 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Jianhui67 talk★contribs 15:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Praxidicae (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Praxidicae (talk) 15:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Stwalkerster (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  stwalkerster (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  25. ZI Jony (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Regards, ZI Jony (Talk) 16:21, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  26. JackPotte (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  JackPotte (talk) 16:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Itti (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Itti (talk) 16:32, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Esteban16 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Esteban16 (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Sänger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Grüße vom Sänger ♫(Reden) 17:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Trijnstel (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  One of the best functionaries (to me) on the largest wiki. Will definitely be a suitable addition to the team. Trijnsteltalk 17:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  31. SQL (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  SQLQuery me! 17:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Barkeep49 (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Barkeep49 (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Stïnger (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Keep going! --Stïnger （会話） 18:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Pharaoh of the Wizards (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:35, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. DannyS712 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  DannyS712 (talk) 18:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Swarm (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Swarm (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Csigabi (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Csigabi (talk) 18:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  38. AmaryllisGardener (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  AmaryllisGardener talk 18:48, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Ankry (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Ankry (talk) 19:11, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Patriccck (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  --Patriccck (talk) 19:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Eggishorn (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Eggishorn (talk) 19:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Kb03 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Kb03 (talk) 19:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  43. Alex Noble (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  ~~ Alex Noble - talk 20:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  44. QEDK (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  QEDK (talk 桜 enwiki) 20:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Hasley (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Sgd. Hasley 20:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Dreamy Jazz (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | enwiki 20:39, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  47. *Youngjin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  *Youngjin (talk) 20:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Diannaa (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Highly trusted user, will make a good steward. Diannaa (talk) 21:40, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Stigfinnare (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Stigfinnare (talk) 21:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  50. MadGuy7023 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  MadGuy7023 (talk) 21:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Joalpe (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Joalpe (talk) 22:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  52. ToBeFree (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  ToBeFree (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Sintakso (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Sintakso (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Mz7 (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Mz7 (talk) 23:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  55. Klaas van Buiten (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  per Rschen7754 Klaas `Z4␟` V:  23:37, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  56. TheSandDoctor (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  No concerns. Would be a valuable addition per ajr. TheSandDoctor Talk 23:58, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  57. Britishfinance (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Britishfinance (talk) 00:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Leaderboard (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Reasonable answer to my difficult question, and the fact that you were asked only two personal questions means something. Leaderboard (talk) 01:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Hiàn (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Reasonably impressive candidate. Hiàn (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  60. Vermont (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Vermont (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Liuxinyu970226 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Armbrust (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Armbrust (talk) 03:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Eatcha (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Eatcha (talk) 04:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Rxy (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Trusted user and Known MediaWiki developer. I hope you to improving steward related tools. Also Wikimedia Steward tools may helpful to your MediaWiki development. rxy (talk) 04:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  65. 1989 (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  1989 (talk) 04:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Rachmat04 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 04:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  67. *angys* (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  *angys* (talk) 07:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  68. AfroThundr3007730 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  — AfroThundr (u · t · c) 08:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  69. Gdarin (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Gdarin | talk 09:21, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  70. Sg7438 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Sg7438 (talk) 09:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  71. MER-C (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Per above, and hopefully would advocate for dedicated funding for anti-abuse tools. MER-C (talk) 10:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  72. Path slopu (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Eligible user. Path slopu (talk) 11:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  73. Thibaut120094 (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Thibaut (talk) 11:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  74. KrakatoaKatie (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Katietalk 12:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  75. 1ForTheMoney (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  1ForTheMoney (talk) 12:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  76. Vituzzu (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Vituzzu (talk) 13:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  77. Coffeeandcrumbs (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  78. MZaplotnik (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  MZaplotnik(talk) 15:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  79. Minoo (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 • Minoo (talk) 16:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  80. Miniapolis (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Trusted functionary, and COI concerns have been addressed. Miniapolis 16:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  81. Ruthven (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ruthven (msg) 17:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  82. Gereon K. (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Gereon K. (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  83. ST47 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Absolutely. ST47 (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  84. Bff (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Bff (talk) 18:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  85. Johannnes89 (Eligible, checked by Linedwell)2020 •  Johannnes89 (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  86. Linedwell (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Linedwell [talk] 19:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  87. Daniel J Zhao (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Daniel J Zhao (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  88. Natuur12 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Natuur12 (talk) 20:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  89. Balabinrm (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Balabinrm (talk) 21:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  90. Dostojewskij (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Dostojewskij (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  91. LPS and MLP Fan (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  MusikAnimal is a very experienced editor on Wikipedia. I am sure he will do a great job as a steward. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 23:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  92. 蟲蟲飛 (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  蟲蟲飛♡♡→♡℃※Talk 03:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  93. Gharouni (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Gharouni 04:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  94. Streetdeck (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  --Wright Streetdeck 04:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  95. SlimVirgin (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  SarahSV talk 05:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  96. Daniuu (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Kind regards, Daniuu (talk) 09:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  97. Jnovikov (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Jnovikov (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  98. Udo T. (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  Udo T. (talk) 11:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  99. Holmium (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Holmium (talk) 11:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  100. Cyfraw (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  cyrfaw (talk) 13:28, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  101. Veracious (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Veracious (talk) 14:30, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  102. Ranjithsiji (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Ranjithsiji (talk) 14:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  103. MichelBakni (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  MichelBakni (talk) 15:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  104. باسم (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  باسم (talk) 15:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  105. Dolotta (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I hold MusikAnimal in high esteem. Dolotta (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  106. Draceane (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Per others. — Draceane talkcontrib. 16:24, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  107. Vmavanti (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Vmavanti (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  108. Fenikals (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Fenikals (talk) 18:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  109. Waddie96 (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Waddie96 (talk) 19:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  110. Cybularny (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  ~Cybularny Speak? 22:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  111. Luke081515 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Luke081515 22:14, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  112. MJL (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I'm weary of the WMF-employment thing. However, as it is in a technical function (rather than community relations), and my positive impression of this user from enwiki; I am more comfortable with this candidacy than I would be for most. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 23:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  113. DavidDelaune (Eligible, checked by WhitePhosphorus)2020 •  DavidDelaune (talk) 03:09, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  114. 人人生來平等 (Eligible, checked by Pallerti)2020 •  人人生來平等 (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  115. Netha Hussain (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Netha Hussain (talk) 09:20, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  116. The Living love (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 • . The Living love (talk) 10:06, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  117. Rzuwig (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rzuwig► 12:04, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  118. Matěj Suchánek (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Awesome! Matěj Suchánek (talk) 12:42, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  119. Saederup92 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Saederup92 (talk) 12:43, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  120. Ejnal (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Ejnal (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  121. JaventheAlderick (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  JaventheAlderick (talk) 16:44, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  122. Tiven2240 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Deserving candidate. Best wishes. Tiven2240 (talk) 18:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  123. Der-Wir-Ing (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Der-Wir-Ing ("DWI") talk 19:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  124. Rots61 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Rots61 (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  125. Melquíades (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Melquíades (talk) 23:10, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  126. Acamicamacaraca (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Acamicamacaraca (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  127. Smallbones (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Smallbones (talk) 05:06, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  128. DemonDays64 (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Great administrator on English Wikipedia! DemonDays64 (talk) 05:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  129. Lemure Saltante (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Lemure Saltante (talk) 06:11, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  130. LuCKY (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  LuCkY talk 06:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  131. Jfblanc (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Jfblanc (talk) 14:43, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  132. Meiræ (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  Meiræ 18:12, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  133. Aschmidt (Eligible, checked by xaosflux)2020 •  Aschmidt (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  134. Awesome Aasim (Verification pending) •  Trusted user on English Wikipedia. Awesome Aasim 23:09, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  135. Gryllida (Verification pending) •  Technically competent, persistent, committed contributor. Gryllida 00:11, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No

  2. Herbythyme (Eligible, checked by Minorax)2020 •  Inadequate cross wiki experience Herby talk thyme 16:23, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Érico (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  More than 90% of the edits come from English Wikipedia. That's great if the candidate apply for a right there. However, in regard to this election, the candidate lacks cross-wiki experience, which is why I cannot support. Érico (talk) 16:26, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Feminist (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Experienced editor, but I am uncomfortable with WMF employees taking the steward role. Feminist (talk) 08:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. SickManWP (Eligible, checked by Ankry)2020 •  I no think he can do this very need job--SickManWP (talk) 05:33, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. La coince (Eligible, checked by DeltaQuad)2020 •  Not convinced La coince (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Dmehus (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Per MJL and Xaosflux. The WMF employment is, admittedly, not that great; what I have more of a problem with is the Steward comes from English Wikipedia, which commands the lion's share of the global community's participation and attention. Thus, with those two factors, I'm inclined to think the user won't be able to devote much time to stewardship. I think we need global stewards to come from the smaller projects, so they can lend hands to helping clearing administrative backlogs on those projects. Dmehus (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral

  2. Xaosflux (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  Leaning towards support, and will revisit. I'm not very keen on employees being community stewards though and think this relationship should have been included in the statement above. — xaosflux Talk 14:22, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry to comment on votes (I generally wouldn't do this), but I did not disclose my affiliation precisely because I believed it wasn't relevant. I have modified my statement, which I hope is permissible. I just wanted to make it clear I'm not trying to hide anything. Kind regards, — MusikAnimal talk 19:53, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  3. CptViraj (Eligible, checked by Stryn)2020 •  CptViraj (📧) 14:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Mirer (Eligible, checked by Jianhui67)2020 •  Mirer (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Krzysiek 123456789 (Eligible, checked by NahidSultan)2020 •  Krzysiek 123456789 (talk) 20:29, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Stephan1000000 (Eligible, checked by CptViraj)2020 •  Stephan1000000 (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Juanmachavez7 (Eligible, checked by Ahmad Kanik)2020 •  Juanmachavez7 (talk) 01:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stewards/Elections_2020/Votes/MusikAnimal&oldid=19803181"