Jump to content

Interbasin transfer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mschiffler (talk | contribs) at 23:43, 12 October 2008 (→‎Primarily for the alleviation of water scarcity: Completed table). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

An interbasin transfer is a transfer of water from one river basin to another. The purpose of an interbasin transfer can be to generate hydropower, to alleviate water shortages in the receiving basin or both. The Green Revolution in India and hydropower development in Canada could not have taken place without such transfers. Also, large cities such as Los Angeles and San Diego would not exist as we know them today without interbasin transfers. The number of interbasin transfers is expected to increase due to increased water demand for irrigation, industry and municipal water supply, as well as possibly because of increased hydrological variability caused by climate change. Interbasin transfers are often large and expensive, involving major infrastructure and in some cases massive use of energy for pumping. They can also be complicated in legal terms, since water rights are affected, especially if the basin of origin is a transboundary river. Furthermore, transfers can have significant environmental impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Finally, in some cases water conservation measures can make interbasin transfers unnecessary, delay the need to build them or reduce their size and cost.

Existing transfers

There are dozens of large inter-basin transfers around the world, most of them concentrated in Australia, Canada, China, India and the United States. The oldest interbasin transfers date back to the late 19th century. Their primary purpose usually is either to alleviate water scarcity or to generate hydropower.

Primarily for the alleviation of water scarcity

Americas

The Central Arizona Project (CAP) in the USA is not an interbasin transfer per se, although it shares many characteristics with interbasin transfers as it transports large amounts of water over a long distance and difference in altitude. The CAP transfers water from the Colorado River to Central Arizona for both agriculture and municipal water supply to substitute for depleted groundwater. However, the water remains within the watershed of the Colorado River.

Asia

  • The Periyar Project in Southern India from the Periyar River in Kerala to the Vaigai basin in Tamil Nadu. It consists of a dam and a tunnel with a discharging capacity of 40.75 cubic meter per second. The project was commissioned in 1895 and provides irrigation to 81,000 hectares, in addition to providing power through a plant with a capacity of 140 MW.
  • The Parambikulam Aliyar project, also in Southern India, consists of seven streams, five flowing towards the west and two towards the east, which have been dammed and interlinked by tunnels. The project transfers water from the Chalakudy River basin to the Bharatapuzha and Cauvery basins for irrigation in Coimbatore district of Tamil Nadu and the Chittur area of Kerala states. It also serverse for power generation with a capacity of 185 MW.
  • The Kurnool Cudappah Canal in Southern India is a scheme started by a private company in 1863, transferring wtaer from the Krishna River basin to the Pennar basin. It includes a 304 km long canal with a capacity of 84.9 cubic meter per second for irrigation.
  • The Telugu Ganga project in Southern India. This project primarily meets the water supply needs of Chennai metropolitan area, but is also used for irrigation. It brings Krishna River water through 406 km of canals. The project, which was approved in 1977 and completed in 2004, involved the cooperation of four Indian States: Maharashtra , Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.
  • The Indira Gandhi Canal (formerly known as the Rajasthan Canal) linking the Ravi River, the Beas River adn the Sutlej River through a system of dams, hydropower plants, tunnels, canals and irrigation systems in Northern India built in the 1960s to irrigate the Thar Desert.[2]
  • The National Water Carrier in Israel, transferring water from the Sea of Galilee (Jordan River Basin) to the Mediterranean coast lifting water over 372 meters. Its water is used both in agriculture and for municipal water supply.
  • The Mahaweli Ganga Project in Sri Lanka includes several inter basin transfers.
  • Irtysh Karaganda scheme in central Kazakhstan is about 450 km long with a maximum capacity of 75 cubic meters per second. It was built between 1962 and 1974 and involves a lift of 14 to 22 m.
  • Numerous transfers in China

Australia

Europe

  • Various transfers from the Ebro River in Spain, which flows to the Mediterranean, to basins draining to the Atlantic, such as Ebro-Besaya transfer of 1982 to supply the industrial area of Torrelavega, the Cerneja-Ordunte transfer to the Bilbao Metropolitan area of 1961, as well as the Zadorra-Arratia transfer that also supplies Bilbao through the Barazar waterfall (Source:Spanish Wikipedia article on the Ebro River. See es:Gestión del agua en España)

Characteristics of major existing interbasin transfers and other large-scale water trasfers to alleviate water scarcity

Year of construction Length Capacity (Million cubic meters/year) Costs (US$ bn)
California State Water Project (USA) Eearly 1960s-1990s 715km 25 (10,300 cubic feet/sec) 5.2
Central Arizona Project (USA) 1973-93 541km 5 (1.5m acre-feet/year) 3.6
National Water Carrier (Israel) 1953-64 130km 1.7 ?
Cutzamala System (Mexico) Late 1970s-late 1990s 154km 2.1 (24 m3/sec) 1.3
All-American Canal (USA) 1930s 132 km 64 (740 m3/sec)
Indira Gandhi Canal (India) Since 1958 650 km
Telugu Ganga project (India) 1977-2004 406 km 10.1 (3.7 bn m3/year)

For the generation of hydropower

  • The Drakensberg Pumped Storage Scheme from the Tugela River that flows into the Indian Ocean into the Vaal River in South Africa, which ultimately drains into the Orange River and the Atlantic Ocean. Its purpose is hydropower generation [3]
  • The Snowy Mountains Scheme and the Barnard River Scheme, both in Australia
  • In Canada, sixteen interbasin transfers have been implemented for hydropower development, including at Kemano, James Bay and Churchill Falls.
  • The Nam Theun II Project in Laos from the Nam Theun River to the Xe Bang Fai River, both tributaries of the Mekong River.
  • The Bheri-Babai Multipurpose Project on the Ghaghara River in India (Hydropower and irrigation)

For other purposes

The Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal in the USA, which serves to divert polluted water from Lake Michigan.

Transfers under construction

The Eastern and Central Routes of the South-North Water Transfer Project in China from the Yangtse River to the Yellow River and Beijing.

Proposed transfers

Africa

From the Ubangi River in Congo to the Chari River which empties into Lake Chad.

Americas

From the São Francisco River to the dry sertão in the four northeastern states of Ceara, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraiba and Pernambuco in Brazil. The project, which was given the green light to go ahead by Brazil's government in 2005, is estimated to cost US$2 billion and is expected to improve the lives of 12m people. After legal challenges were brought against the project, the Supreme Court allowed it to go ahead in December 2007.

The project would divert 1.4% of the river's water for municipal water supply, industry and irrigation. Municipal water supply would receive priority over other uses, which would only be catered for only when the reservoir behind the Sobradinho dam on the Sao Francisco River, which produces much of the region's electricity, is nearly full about 40% of the time. The project actually consists of two transfers:The East axis would transfer water to the Paraíba do Norte River, while the North axis would transfer water to the Jaguaribe and Piranhas rivers. The project includes 700 km of canals and tunnels, as well as several dams. It is expected to displace almost a million people and construction is expected to take 20 years to complete.

Critics of the project argue that beneficiary states should improve management of their own water before importing it from outside the region. Bishop Luiz Flávio Cappio from Bahia also wonders why water is being exported when 3m poor live along the Sao Francisco river's course, many of them without plumbing. He argues that the transfer “will demand huge resources that could be spent on other projects much closer to the reality of the people”. It is also being said that the project will mainly benefit richer farmers who already have irrigation infrastructure in place and not rainfed farmers that are hardest hit by drought. The alleged insufficiency of water in the Sao Francisco River itself during the dry season, and its consequent impact on aquatic ecosystems, is another argument of critics. For example, João Alves Filho, governor of the state of Sergipe, says that there are already “signs of mortality” where the river joins the sea. Marco Antônio Tavares Coelho, a prominent opponent, says that "aridity is the natural state of the sertão" and that soaking it would be like "removing ice from the North Pole".[4] In 2001 the World Bank reportedly refused to finance the project because of its limited impact in combating poverty and drought.[5] See also Water resources management in Brazil and pt:Transposição do rio São Francisco.

Asia

Australia

The Bradfield Scheme in Queensland, serving primarily for irrigation

Literature

References