User talk:TinaLees-Jones

Thanks for your contributions to Tong Wei (artist). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Damanaged and incomplete references. Bare urls. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. scope_creep^Talk 06:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep Sorry, I have this page watchlisted due to a previous warning, and I've had a look at the article in question. What bare URLs? The references are all in Chinese, and while that's not ideal, they do not appear to be malformed, and they are complete enough for me to identify the works in question. Could you explain in further detail? GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 19:52, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TinaLees-Jones:@GreenLipstickLesbian: The page numbers for the book were missing were meaning unreliable references failing WP:V, that combined with a bare url on a references and no trans-title tags. Having no page numbers makes the references unreliable, combined with bare urls. It was more than borderline anyway. I see the book reference still have no page number, although additional references have been added, which is good I suppose. scope_creep^Talk 07:42, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep I get why not having page numbers isn't ideal, but not having page numbers just means that it's hard to verify the material. It doesn't make the reference unreliable, just inconvenient. And while it's also true that we prefer it when people translate the their reference titles, it's not actually required for something to be in the mainspace. In fact, I had an article get approved to run on the main page while using untranslated titles. I'm not sure there's community consensus that just because a source title isn't in English means that it's unsuitable for mainspace. I'd be happy to look further into the issue, however, or ask others for their opinions. And I'm still not seeing any bare URLs in the article at the time of draftification, but I've probably missed them. Could you point them out to me? (And, maybe somewhere other than TinaLees-Jones talkpage? I feel like she's lent it to us for quite long enough already). GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:14, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know. It does make the cite book reference unreliable. Page numbers are the core of a cite book reference, otherwise they wouldn't be there. When you look at the time that readers spend looking at the article, they must be able to find the information quickly, under 7 seconds is the limit (It used to be that) or they move on. So it is contigent on us to make it easy as possible on them to find the information. I always tag the references unreliable if the page numbers are missing. Your right, its not a requirement for the reference material to be in English, which is long established consensus but it would be handy, but it seems to hide a whole series of abuses that wouldn't necessarily be visible if the text were in English, particularly when the article is translated. It wouldn't help of the trans-title tag were present right enough. Ref 7 is a bare url. scope_creep^Talk 08:28, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TinaLeesJones, you've been warned on four separate occasions to provide attribution when you translate content from the Chinese Wikipedia. And yet, I see you have failed to do so on the page China–Tunisia relations. Fix the attribution, following the steps at WP:RIA. Going forward, attribute all of your translations following the steps at WP:TFOLWP. Consider this your fifth warning. If you carry on plagiarising the Chinese Wikipedia (because that is what you are doing), I will go to WP:ANI and asked for you to be blocked or partially blocked from mainspace. But I know I won't have to do that, because I know you'll fix your mistakes and correctly attribute the text you add in the future. And if you have any questions about how to attribute text, you will ask me, one of the editors who warned you in the past, or the folks over at the WP:TEAHOUSE for assistance. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 19:48, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am new for Wikipedia, and wonder since I have updated the inter-wikipedia logs at Talk:China–Tunisia relations (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AChina%E2%80%93Tunisia_relations&diff=1247269377&oldid=1200854229), what should I do to meet your requirements? Thank you and have a nice day. TinaLees-Jones (talk) 02:34, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you keep doing this, you will likely get blocked. Attribution is critical. It is the core part of copyright policy on Wikipedia. The Admin Corps have no patience for editors who continual fail to attribute. I know from experience. scope_creep^Talk 07:44, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, TinaLeesJones. The talk page notice is a great start! What we're really looking for is a link to the original text in the edit summary, whenver you translate text. This can look something like Content in this edit was translated from the Chinese Wikipedia page [[:zh:EXACT NAME OF zhWIKI PAGE]], or it could look something like Content translated from https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E2%80%94%E7%AA%81%E5%B0%BC%E6%96%AF%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB&oldid=82973632 . Either would be okay.

If you forget to add attribution, you should say something like Previous versions of this article contain material translated from [[:zh:EXACT NAME OF zhWIKI PAGE]] or Previous versions of this article contain material translated from https://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E2%80%94%E7%AA%81%E5%B0%BC%E6%96%AF%E5%85%B3%E7%B3%BB&oldid=82973632

And, by edit summary, I mean the little box that should show up underneath you edit. It looks like this:

The URL or link to the original page needs to go in that box. Can you try doing that for me on China–Tunisia relations? GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 07:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have just done an update in China–Tunisia relations. Can I understand that there are two parts.

1. fill in the information translated from in the talk page.

2. write the source in the Edit summary page.

And then this is the full use of Creative Common 4.0 rules? Are there any other notes that need to be filled in? TinaLees-Jones (talk) 11:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's what you need to do. and I had a look at the edit you did on China-Tunisia relations. That's perfect! Thank you so much. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 21:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1965 in Guangzhou indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:40, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TinaLees-Jones

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Goldsztajn, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Nagqu Hotel, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Goldsztajn}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Goldsztajn (talk) 20:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China Association of Agricultural Science Societies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yang Jun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TinaLees-Jones

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Significa liberdade and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect National Sports Administration, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 5 § National Sports Administration.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Significa liberdade}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]