Jump to content

Talk:Cosmic Egg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Nythar (talk | contribs) at 08:08, 16 September 2024 (clean up + removing IA Bot posts). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Track Listing

[edit]

The track listing on the site is a complete mess, could someone please fix it?--189.202.34.112 (talk) 02:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I think it looks fine. What do you propose we do? Please give an example on the talk page before editing the article proper. Andre666 (talk) 12:31, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Somebody just fixed it, it makse more sense now--189.202.41.166 (talk) 21:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

[edit]

I think the article title should be changed to Cosmic Egg (album) instead of just Cosmic Egg, given the fact that there is an article about the universe also titled Cosmic egg. It would also be more descriptive when it comes to linking this article. Does that sound like a good idea?

If so, I would change the name myself, but I'm not sure how. If someone can explain how to do it, or just make the change themselves, that'd be great. Moviemaniacx (talk) 17:21, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article began life at Cosmic Egg (album), but was moved to its current position. Many articles are done like this, where capitalisation makes it a new thing. Andre666 (talk) 01:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article nomination

[edit]

We should consider nominating this article as a good article. It is well-sourced, with detailed sections, and is overall well-written. — Hucz (talk · contribs) 09:40, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I pretty much wrote all of it. Go ahead and nominate if you think it will succeed, but you might want to go through it with a fine comb first to check it's all in good shape. I personally have other stuff going on, but could look at it this weekend if you don't get time. Andre666 (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://wolfmother.shop.bravadousa.com/Dept.aspx?cp=21923_21966
    Triggered by \bshop\.bravadousa\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:02, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

this album pretty much bombed in the U.S.

[edit]

Despite critics giving good reviews, it was almost completely ignored in N. America. This should be mentioned in the article. Not sure about the U.K. sales, but I have never heard anyone from home even mentioning this album? 98.67.0.105 (talk) 14:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Except that it reached a higher Billboard chart position than Wolfmother, so... yeah. Andre666 (talk) 14:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]