Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 April 2

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale for one article. Dianna (talk) 03:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Douglas Ford GC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is not enough information to verify the claim that the photo indeed is anonymous. Additionally, there is no information about the copyright status in the United States. The source link is dead. Stefan2 (talk) 00:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 04:02, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albert Matthew Osborne - recipient of the George Cross in 1942.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is not enough information to verify the claim that the photo indeed is anonymous. Additionally, there is no information about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 04:06, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edward Colquhoun Charlton VC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is not enough information to verify the claim that the photo indeed is anonymous or that it was published before 1943 as required by the licence. Additionally, there is no information about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 04:07, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alfred Sephton VC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is not enough information to verify the claim that the photo indeed is anonymous. Additionally, there is no information about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 00:08, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 04:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ernest Wright Alexander.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is not enough information to verify the claim that the photo indeed is anonymous. Additionally, there is no information about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 04:13, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:John James Clements.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• There is not enough information to verify the claim that the photo indeed is anonymous. Additionally, there is no information about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 00:13, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Converted to Non Free Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Is this a scan from a newspaper? If so, see WP:NFC#UUI §7. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F5 by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Here's to Never Growing Up - Avril Lavigne.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• So apparently this image is not an "obvious" case of copyright violation and a speedy delete was denied. So I am starting a discussion instead (again?). This file is not the official cover art to the new Avril Lavigne single "Here's to Never Growing Up". This is a fan-made representation of a coverart that uses copyrighted images and graphics from the official promotional website for the song to create their own version of the song's cover art. You can clearly see (or at least I can) that the text from the corner of the site was simply copied and pasted over the image background and then "filled" to remove background "noise". The only "sources" to this image are from fan websites (such as tumblr) and there are no officials sources that can confirm that this is the official artwork. I strongly believe this is a copyright violation and should be removed from Wikipedia. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 01:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:03, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freedom Press Kropotkin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Freedom Press Kropotkin.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Writtle College estate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Dubious own work considering other uploads by this user. Stefan2 (talk) 12:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raftsplash 0025.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• User has two uploads and very little contribution history. Both of them are low-resolution rafting photos of rafting trips. I found a version of this one at http://www.smokymountaintours.net/?event=offer.detail&offerId=7381 and their other photos are clearly not from Wikipedia, so I seriously doubt that these are user-authored photos. B (talk) 16:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thesinks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• User has two uploads and very little contribution history. Both of them are low-resolution rafting photos of rafting trips. I found a source for the other one. This one, I found used a lot of places, including an unattributed use at CNN - http://finance.fortune.cnn.com/2010/11/17/kayak-hopes-googleita-merger-doesnt-sink-ipo/. CNN doesn't usually steal Wikipedia photos that I've seen, so I'm guessing/assuming that this is actually a promotional photo. In any event, I have no confidence that either of these are user-authored. B (talk) 16:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shirley Schluter SAFETY TOWN Class of 1937.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The permission appears to come from the heir of the subject of the photo, but it should come from the heir of the photographer instead. Stefan2 (talk) 18:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Romy Gosz Portrait.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• "This file is in the public domain, because Source is a family photo "

Whose family? The uploader's family? Is uploader the heir of the photographer? Stefan2 (talk) 18:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This photograph is owned by the article author/uploader (LJGosz). The article author/uploader is the grandson of the article subject (Romy Gosz). LJGosz (talk) 18:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But is the uploader also the heir of the photographer? --Stefan2 (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lott and Thomason on the U-35.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The uploader hasn't provided any information as to why this wouldn't be protected by copyright. A few Nazi photos are in the public domain in the United States because they are seized property and certain other conditions apply. If this is what the uploader means, then the uploader needs to include a reference to the relevant US archive as well as evidence that the other conditions apply. Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Report on the Settlement of the Bareilly District By S M Moens, North-Western Provinces Government 1874.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The first page is an unlicensed text written by Google. The rest of the file is in the public domain. Stefan2 (talk) 18:43, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Edit the document remove the first page. The only restriction from Google is to maintain the watermark. Move to WikiSource as a source document. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prevalence of Female Genital Cutting.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Bottom right corner of image clearly shows CC BY-NC-ND logo  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Female labor force participation.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• World bank license (both at web site and page " iv (6 of 458)" of the Full PDF report) is All Rights Reserved"  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:54, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Economic growth of women.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• World bank license (both at web site and page " iv (6 of 458)" of the Full PDF report) is All Rights Reserved"  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Global female labor force participation.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• World bank license (both at web site and page " iv (6 of 458)" of the Full PDF report) is All Rights Reserved"  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fields of study in multiple countries by sex.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• World bank license (both at web site and page " iv (6 of 458)" of the Full PDF report) is All Rights Reserved"  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:05, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sex segregation growth gears.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• World bank license (both at web site and page " iv (6 of 458)" of the Full PDF report) is All Rights Reserved"  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 19:55, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.