Jump to content

User talk:Kkhemet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Kaffir piano

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Kaffir piano, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 03:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 04:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Frederick J. Loudin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Portage County, George White, Andrew Ward and Harriet Johnson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Oscar W. Ritchie, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greek, KSU and WPA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edward W. Crosby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Administrator
Eugene B. Redmond (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Crosby

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bio articles

[edit]

It's great that you're writing the important series of articles on notable Black people associated with Kent State and Toledo.But there are are few things that have me a little concerned: the articles are too much in the nature of testimonials. It's much better to simply give the achievements, without saying explicitly wonderful they are--the reader will get the idea very well. In general in encyclopedic writing, the few articles the better--certainly not articles of praise. (The article that attracted my attention was Edward W. Crosby where the tone was so rhetorical that I thought it might be a copyvio from some publication--it sounds like what a university would write about one of its distinguished faculty. )

Most of what I do around here now is rewriting promotional articles, which have similar problems. I'm willing to work on these, &I'm always glad to work on academics, but it would be much better if you took a look yourself, because there is so great a influx of more serious material, where unless they're rewritten ,they won't even stay in Wikipedia, which is not in question here, that I may not get to these for a while. I'm sure you want to make the articles as strong as possible. DGG ( talk ) 05:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Black towns (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Easton, Livingston, Vernon, Porter, Summit, Dominican, Grayson, Brooksville, Taft, Atlantic Beach, Booker, Clearview, Langston, Eatonville, Yanga, Nacimiento, Allensworth, Matawai, Dinsmore, Boley and Garifuna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Black towns has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

list of places with no indication of why they are included.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Malcolma (talk) 08:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward W. Crosby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hough (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Robinson House

[edit]

Good day! I see you have done some more work on your article and I added a few references as well. I was about to move it to the main space when I noticed someone already had. It is not yet showing up when I do a google search, though, so I will keep an eye on it and if it still needs to be moved properly I'll get it done for you. Thanks for your efforts - it's a good article. Maybe you should do a longer one on Gentleman Jim now? All the best. --Snowysusan (talk) 22:14, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries - I'll give you a hand with the photos! Give me a day... also I just moved the article into the main space. --Snowysusan (talk) 00:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GimliDotNet (Speak to me,Stuff I've done) 19:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

my apologies, obviously I moved too quickly--I have restored and marked that it is underconstruction. However, please consider whether it is appropriate to make an article on both him and his house, or whether you should combine the material under one or another of the titles, and make a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 23:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

James Robinson

[edit]

Thanks for your quick response. I wrote an article on the house because it has its own story that has lived far beyond the lifetime of its owner. The man James Robinson has his own story to tell that also goes beyond that of the house when you take into account his history making relatives, like the Stokes brothers, Steve Harvey and Rick James, etc, If I were to combine the two together I feel that it would quickly reach the point where I'd have to create two separate articles anyway, because of the significance of the Robinson family.

--Kkhemet (talk) 01:56, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James "Gentleman Jim" Robinson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Bull Run (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

James "Gentleman Jim" Robinson

[edit]

Please see Talk:James "Gentleman Jim" Robinson. --Lexein (talk) 18:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robinson House (Manassas, Virginia), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Battle of Bull Run, John Pope and Pittsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:39, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph H. Howard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folkways (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Robinson House

[edit]

This issue was raised recently in the talk page for Second Battle of Bull Run. I acknowledged it and have not gotten around to refreshing the maps yet. Hal Jespersen (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Server Error 113

[edit]

I keep getting this error whenever I try to preview a book in Pedia Press or order a book from Pedia Press. Everything else works fine until I try to access Pedia Press. What's the problem? The message looks like this:

An error occurred on the render server: error executing command 'zip_post': <urlopen error [Errno 113] No route to host>

Kkhemet (talk) 08:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Return to Main Page.

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Montego Joe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Willis Jackson

Kkhemet (talk) 22:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)I made an error in the title that I could not correct and then made a number of revisions to the original article. The link above is the version that should appear on WP. Can you fix this for me? Also, would like to know why only the German version appears when I do a search?[reply]

Montego joe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Willis Jackson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and paste move of Montego joe

[edit]

--Kkhemet (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC) Thanks for the response. I'll try your suggestion. Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Montego joe a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Montego Joe. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.[reply]

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 20:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley

[edit]
Saturday, April 5 - WikiWomen's Edit-a-thon at the University of California, Berkeley - You are invited!
The University of California, Berkeley's Berkeley Center for New Media is hosting our first edit-a-thon, facilitated by WikiWoman Sarah Stierch, on April 5! This event, focused on engaging women to contribute to Wikipedia, will feature a brief Wikipedia policy and tips overview, followed by a fast-paced energetic edit-a-thon. Everyone is welcome to attend.

Please bring your laptop and be prepared to edit about women and women's history!

The event is April 5, from 1-5 PM, at the Berkeley Center for New Media Commons at Moffitt Library.

You must RSVP here - see you there! SarahStierch (talk) 00:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! Litquake Edit-a-thon in San Francisco

[edit]
You are invited!Litquake Edit-a-thonSee you there!
  In the area? You're invited to
   San Francisco Meetup # 22
  Date: October 11, 2014
  Time: 1-5 pm
  Place: 149 New Montgomery Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105
  prev: Meetup 21 - next: Meetup 23 | All SF meetups & events

The Edit-a-thon will occur in parallel with Litquake, the San Francisco Bay Area's annual literature festival. Writers from all over the Bay Area and the world will be in town during the nine day festival, so the timing is just right for us to meetup and create/translate/expand/improve articles about literature and writers. All levels of Wikipedia editing experience are welcome. This event will include new editor training. RSVP →here←. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:45, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Kkhemet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Kkhemet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Kkhemet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lying in state vs. Lying in Honor

[edit]

Hi; I just corrected your edit in Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Rosa Parks laid in honor, not in state. I've provided a couple of references. Basically, it's technical: in order to lie in state, you must be a member of the government in some way, which Rosa Parks was not. E.g., [1] and [2]. I left the reference to Parks, but modified the description. I also fixed the one in Rosa Parks. Note that your reference states she laid in honor, not in state. Magidin (talk) 19:26, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kkhemet (talk) 02:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Thanks for making the corrections and the edits. I'm a stickler about citations that are incorrect, so I have no problem being corrected. The first references I looked for were in newspapers, from 2005. I did use the Capitol Architect's webpage as a reference, but misread it.[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Cuffe, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Akan and Fante. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]