Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Article improvement drive: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
agreement to tiebreaking procedure. |
|||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Yea [[User:Jaranda|Jaranda]] [[User_talk:Jaranda|<sup>wat's sup</sup>]] 02:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC) |
Yea [[User:Jaranda|Jaranda]] [[User_talk:Jaranda|<sup>wat's sup</sup>]] 02:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Sounds good. —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 10:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC) |
:Sounds good. —[[User:wknight94|Wknight94]] ([[User talk:wknight94|talk]]) 10:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
::Yeah, the tiebreaking procedure is fine. Glad to see this is finally being implemented. Just out of curiosity, did this come as a result of my suggestion [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball_players#An_inspiration_from_CoTW|this]] ? --[[User:Nishkid64|<span style="color:red">'''Nish'''</span><span style="color:blue">'''kid'''</span><span style="color:green">'''64'''</span>]] 21:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:42, 8 September 2006
Proposed rules
Votes
- Most Cummulative votes wins. Not just the weekly total.
- I propose 4 votes for an article to stay.
- No opposing votes. If it's not worthy, don't vote for it.
- 1 registered user can only vote once for one paticular article. However, a register user can vote for as many articles as he/she wants. (Does this make sense to everyone. I'm not sure if I worded it right.)
Kingjeff 03:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Nominations
- Any baseball related (MLB or not) is allowed to be nominated.
- Repeat nominations are not allowed for 1 month.
- Do not put any red links as nominated article. However, if an article already created has too many red links, then that could be a reason. Kingjeff 03:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Tiebreaking
- First tiebreaker will go to articles listed as stubs.
- and the second tiebreaker will go to the first article nominated.
Kingjeff 03:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Discussion on entire rules
- I'm not real familiar with WP:AID but these rules sound pretty similar, right? Except AID says each article needs four votes per week to stay on. Like I said, I'm not real clear on what that means so please educate me if you want. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree for the rules except for the 4 votes thing for now as this is just getting started. Three votes are ok for now. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 01:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Does everyone agree with the tiebreaking procedure? Kingjeff 02:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Yea Jaranda wat's sup 02:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sounds good. —Wknight94 (talk) 10:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, the tiebreaking procedure is fine. Glad to see this is finally being implemented. Just out of curiosity, did this come as a result of my suggestion this ? --Nishkid64 21:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)