User talk:The Maigne Event: Difference between revisions

Hi everybody, I am The Maigne Event,and welcome to my page! I know a lot of stuff and I appreciate contributing here on Wikipedia.

Hi The Maigne Event! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Maigne Event, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shearonink (talk) 06:14, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Pass a Method talk 19:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Pass a Method talk 19:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Maigne Event. The issue of whether or not George Washington can be considered a "Deist" or a "Christian" has been discussed at least 12 previous times on the article's talk pages, please refer to Previous Archived discussions about Deism. Designating him as a Deist is the current editorial consensus. Before you change that infobox information again, please take a look at the previous discussions and then post your concerns on Talk:George Washington. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 19:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. You did not sign your post at User talk:PAB1990 or your post at Talk:George Washington. Shearonink (talk) 20:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Im aware they monitored Fred Hampton. The reason for this is understood best in the context of the cold war, homegrown communists were feared. And Fred was not only a home grown communist but a successful chairman of a communist black political party- The Black Panthers.

But was being a communists an actual crime at that particular time, was he subject to McCarthyism law ? He was previously arrested for stealing a lot of candy bars and was punished. But one crime doesn't make a man a criminal for life.

He wasn't killed for illegal activity. He was killed unarmed, at home in bed possibly drugged by a FBI informant, because he was successfully involved in politics, revolutionary communism, which was anathema to American ideals.

To label Fred Hampton as a murdered criminal, it is necessary to prove that he was killed by the police for illegal criminal acts and not for his political activity or views, which is the consensus not only by historians but on Wikipedia. If you make a new topic in the Fred Hampton talk page regarding the issue the merits of your case can be weighed up by all editors.RedsaidFred (talk) 09:14, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see you changed the language on Fred Hampton to murder instead of assassination. Can you please elaborate on your reasoning. It might be better to take this up on the talk page, but I see you have not provided any explanation there either. Feel free to review my comment here Talk:Fred_Hampton#Murder_and_Assassination_Again. Briefly, my understanding is that assassination is the 'murder (usually of a prominent person) by a sudden and/or secret attack, often for political reasons.' How does this not apply? You reasoning seems to be that he "was not a national figure" which I find arbitrary, unexplained, and unremarkable. Please clarify. Thanks! ./zro (⠠⠵) 01:19, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I notice you have again changed the language in the Fred Hampton article without explaining the reasoning. Please make your argument on the talk page that I linked above, or at the very least respond here. Thanks. ./zro (⠠⠵) 05:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your original edit summary of "There are some questionable stuff about Lee Oswald being the assassin.Because of it, in reality this is a an unsolved murder", you appear to be inserting a variant of the "alleged" qualifier that has consistently been rejected by consensus of other editors on this subject. Please review WP:WEASEL and WP:ALLEGED for commentary on such implied equivocation, and please use the article's talkpage if you wish to explain why it is important to have such a qualifier. In general, the shorter the content of the infobox, the better. The article text is a better place to discuss less straightforward views. Acroterion (talk) 16:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aaron Michaels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - Vivvt (Talk) 19:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The name of the defendant is George Michael Zimmerman, but that is not the name of the case. Both the state, Defense, and judicial are using "State of Florida vs George Zimmerman" as the title of the case.

• http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/motion_to_prohibit.pdf
• http://www.gzdocs.com/documents/0613/states_17_discovery_redacted_exhibits_redacted.pdf
• http://www.flcourts18.org/PDF/Press_Releases/Order%20Continuing%20Case.pdf

Gaijin42 (talk) 14:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think the article, or article title should include "Michael" ? There is consensus on the talk page that this is not so, backed by multiple sources. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've left a note at User talk:Dobbyelf62 regarding the Fleetwood Mac personnel section. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved Bob Weston (guitarist) back to where it was. The other Bob Weston is also a musician, which is why this one had this title in the first place. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:16, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]