User talk:SimonKSK: Difference between revisions

Home	Talk	Contribs	SIGN!!!	Awards	Subpages

Today's motto...
→ We didn't need dialogue. We had faces.

Nominate one today!

edit

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Status: Online

Re your message on my talk page How did I violate WP:Canvas? My notice was not biased (it stated only the facts and did not attempt to persuade), partisan (it informed editors on both sides of the issue) or secret (it was on-wiki). It was also a limited posting, informing only the two editors directly involved (though I did inform one of the editors via both his user talk page and his IP talk page). I can't see how this is violating WP:Canvas. superluser_tc 2009 February 04, 05:31 (UTC)

Hello, SimonKSK. You have new messages at Nutiketaiel's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey, I just have one small question to ask in a kind and wondering manner; what does this mean: [1]--WillC 01:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I hope to, but I'm busy at the moment. When I return full time I will come back with a bang.--WillC 00:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simon. You reverted my link target corrections on Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/Decisions, stating: "We are talking about the official policy, please don't revert decided links". You might want to check where WP:COLLAB actually goes: originally to User:Fyslee/First law, a user's private sandbox, and starting today to Wikipedia:Collaboration first, a behavioural essay. Neither has ever been policy.

I don't really mind either way; Wikipedia:Collaboration first is a pretty appropriate link target for the motto anyway. —{admin} Pathoschild 03:38:17, 06 February 2009 (UTC)

sorry, I didn't know. I saw that it went to an essay, so I thought it differed from WP:Collabrate. Sorry for any inconvience. It's just that it has been decided with those links, so it is best not to change anything. Thanks for the notice, though. Simon^KSK 15:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I also changed the link on Wikipedia:Motto of the day/March 1, 2009, if you'd like to revert that too. —{admin} Pathoschild 19:22:08, 06 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks man, and Nice vandal Warning. Altenhofen (talk) 18:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am a native in Lurish people. I speak in this language but someone in Persian they dont want our language to be appear and they try to clear and digest our nation in Persians. Please help me to know how can I to produce my language in wikipedia. Meanwhile there was a page in name "Lurish nanguage" but it have deleted by them now.I am waiting for your response.--Shadegan (talk) 19:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it's my old account and all the pages were suppose to be deleted so was just blanking the ones that weren't (if you try an access User:AlexD you can see that it doesn't exist anymore, and check the history log it will show that I requested it to be deleted). If you know how could you delete the remaining pages please. Thanks. 81.102.94.23 (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday! Simply south not SS, sorry 14:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can't you take pics of your tv? If it says I created this by myself only it's true? RedRooster96 22:35, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right. Sorry. --RedRooster96 22:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Sir! RedRooster96 22:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I noticed that. I got it fixed a minute ago.--WillC 22:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain to me how WWE's official website and another site that is used for citation three other times in the same article is considered unreliable. I'm pretty sure Wikipedia's standards say that factual changes override so-called "consensus." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wwehurricane1 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that having it on their OFFICIAL WEBSITE qualifies as an announcement. And if wrestle view is unreliable, then everything in the article that uses it as a source should be removed. That doesn't even make sense.Wwehurricane1 (talk) 02:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Why else would they change it? 2. They also changed it on the video for WWE on Pay Per View that airs during their shows. Go back and watch it if you have this week's shows on DVR. I did when I read that in that other discussion.Wwehurricane1 (talk) 02:26, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can read. There is no need to start attacking me. The video that aired on RAW was a promotional ad, but unfortunately, I can't take it from my DVR and put it here.Wwehurricane1 (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What are the chances that Wwehurricane1 (talk · contribs) is Kalajan (talk · contribs)? Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 14:28, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do I email a user? ↑RR↓*96* 21:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]