Talk:Marketing mix/Archives/2013: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) Archiving 1 discussion from Talk:Marketing mix. (BOT) |
Gnomingstuff (talk | contribs) rv 2013 vandalism to someone else's comment |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
There is nothing wrong with the word 'organisation' for a worldwide context. It is just as valid as 'organization'. Please see this link [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences#-ise_.2F_-ize] as justification]. |
There is nothing wrong with the word 'organisation' for a worldwide context. It is just as valid as 'organization'. Please see this link [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences#-ise_.2F_-ize] as justification]. |
||
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/123.63.97.171|123.63.97.171]] ([[User talk:123.63.97.171|talk]]) 09:51, 17 November 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:22, 5 September 2024
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Marketing mix
There are several miss-spelled words in this article. Mostly Organisation instead of organization. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.30.122.42 (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC).
There is nothing wrong with the word 'organisation' for a worldwide context. It is just as valid as 'organization'. Please see this link [1] as justification].