Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball/Article improvement drive: Difference between revisions

• Most Cummulative votes wins. Not just the weekly total.
• I propose 4 votes for an article to stay.
• No opposing votes. If it's not worthy, don't vote for it.
• 1 registered user can only vote once for one paticular article. However, a register user can vote for as many articles as he/she wants. (Does this make sense to everyone. I'm not sure if I worded it right.)

Kingjeff 03:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Any baseball related (MLB or not) is allowed to be nominated.
• Repeat nominations are not allowed for 1 month.
• Do not put any red links as nominated article. However, if an article already created has too many red links, then that could be a reason. Kingjeff 03:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• First tiebreaker will go to articles listed as stubs.
• and the second tiebreaker will go to the first article nominated.

Kingjeff 03:33, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not real familiar with WP:AID but these rules sound pretty similar, right? Except AID says each article needs four votes per week to stay on. Like I said, I'm not real clear on what that means so please educate me if you want. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree for the rules except for the 4 votes thing for now as this is just getting started. Three votes are ok for now. Thanks Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:56, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does everyone agree with the tiebreaking procedure? Kingjeff 02:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yea Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 02:38, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. —Wknight94 (talk) 10:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the tiebreaking procedure is fine. Glad to see this is finally being implemented. Just out of curiosity, did this come as a result of my suggestion this ? --Nishkid64 21:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the entire article improvement drive or the tiebreaking rule? Kingjeff 21:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]