User talk:Enologix: Difference between revisions

Howdy, I saw your edits to the Enologix article and given your user name it seems that you are closely related to the subject. While I appreciate that your edits contained independent third party sourcing and didn't cross the WP:NPOV and WP:SPAM lines, I would be concerned about the apparent conflict of interest. You may want to read to Wikipedia's policy on the matter found at WP:COI. For future efforts, I would recommend approaching your edits on the article talk page and allow other Wikipedia editors to actually add the information. As a member of the Wine Project, I would be glad to help with editing the article to avoid the COI. Agne^Cheese/^Wine 04:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a healthy concern for the editorial comment added to Enologix, i.e. last sentence. I have a concern over the removal of the References, too. The article now includes a salacious comment, without references. Moreover, Enologix entry has been corrupted by removing the references. History of this entry started with an entry with references, independent of our augmentation. Additional major international and national media journalists investigations were added. Apparently you reomoved the references which leaves the copy unsupported by references. Moreover, a salacious comment is now included in the article which mixes issues of contributor opinion with third party factoids. At any rate we would like you to reinstate the references. I would love to help with the wine project.