Talk:Montlake Branch Library: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Contested deletion: No, these essays don't contribute to GNG at all |
→Another HistoryLink.org source: new section |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because notability is established under [[WP:NBUILDING]] via two awards from the [[American Institute of Architects]], plus multiple [[Historylink]] articles contribute to GNG. --☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">[[User:Bri|Bri]]</span> ([[User talk:Bri|talk]]) 15:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because notability is established under [[WP:NBUILDING]] via two awards from the [[American Institute of Architects]], plus multiple [[Historylink]] articles contribute to GNG. --☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">[[User:Bri|Bri]]</span> ([[User talk:Bri|talk]]) 15:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
||
:You mean those two essays which state "This essay made possible by: Seattle Public Library Foundation"? No, these don't contribute to GNG at all, and these were the only sources at the time of nomination. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 15:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
:You mean those two essays which state "This essay made possible by: Seattle Public Library Foundation"? No, these don't contribute to GNG at all, and these were the only sources at the time of nomination. [[User:Fram|Fram]] ([[User talk:Fram|talk]]) 15:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Another HistoryLink.org source == |
|||
*https://dev.historylink.org/File/10170 |
|||
--[[User:Another Believer|<span style="color:navy">Another Believer</span>]] <sub>([[User talk:Another Believer|<span style="color:#C60">Talk</span>]])</sub> 16:58, 26 August 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:58, 26 August 2024
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
I've included multiple sources, and even the tag says "Note that educational institutions are not eligible under this criterion". ----Another Believer (Talk) 14:42, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because notability is established under WP:NBUILDING via two awards from the American Institute of Architects, plus multiple Historylink articles contribute to GNG. --☆ Bri (talk) 15:35, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
- You mean those two essays which state "This essay made possible by: Seattle Public Library Foundation"? No, these don't contribute to GNG at all, and these were the only sources at the time of nomination. Fram (talk) 15:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Another HistoryLink.org source
Categories:
- Stub-Class Architecture articles
- Low-importance Architecture articles
- Stub-Class Libraries articles
- Low-importance Libraries articles
- WikiProject Libraries articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- Stub-Class Seattle articles
- Low-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- Articles created or improved during WikiProject United States' 50,000 Challenge
- WikiProject United States articles