Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles
This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians. New participants are welcome; please feel free to participate!
|
Ask yourselves: why didn't you look up Wikipedia's articles about economy, Dmitri Mendeleev, man, or land even though you know little about them? Simple, because they suck. Millions of people feel the same way too. This is not acceptable on our side and this must be changed by making these articles good.
Subpages
edit- Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles/Tools - technical how-to on how to use tools and scripts
Past work
edit- 30 kB drive
- 47 articles expanded to 30 kilobytes; 26 July 2022 – 31 August 2022
- Vital GA Drive
- Land to good article status, unsuccessful; 1 September – 15 November 2022
Function
editThis WikiProject is designed to be a public space that has neat stuff to do or learn about, and to serve as a place where you sit down, relax, and make edits or discuss with others. Its purpose is to improve the Vitals articles and lists. We always welcome anonymous and new people here (and if you are one of them, have a chat at the talk page!)
There is no such thing as "joining" or "registering" for this WikiProject, as it is an overarching project that aims to gather other WikiProjects together for collaboration. If you're actively improving vital articles, you're already a member of this WikiProject. If you want to find people that are working on Vital articles, use this link to find recent edits and talk to them directly.
Tasks
edit- Wikipedia:Database reports/Vital articles update report
- Backlog!Unassessed vital articles – 7 articles in total
- No backlogVital articles with unknown topic – 0 articles in total
A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Improving a Vital article
editWhile we might not know the exact formula for mass-producing Vital GAs, we do know ways to tackle and improve these kind of articles. Here are some techniques that you can use:
- Don't be afraid to try and don't be a perfectionist. Yes, that paragraph that you just wrote might not be there once the article is at GAN, but it will be an important stepping stone for recognizing further improvement. As long as your own content is significantly better and more reliable than the rest of the article, you've done a good job.
- Be concise and keep the summary style in mind. An article should not be too long or else the readers will become dizzy (~60 kB of readable prose is the ideal size). Pro tip: one of the best way to quickly raise article quality is to trim bad content, such as cruft, unsourced sections, original research, etc.
- Be mindful of systematic bias. For vital articles specifically, the most commonly encountered bias is American-European bias. For example, there's a tendency of using European allegories or paintings to illustrate abstract ideas. Don't just swap these images for the sake of diversity however. Remember, the best images are the one that is relevant, high-resolution, sharp, shows the subject clearly in the small thumbnail and is applicable to all cultures.
- Patrol sources and ensure their quality. If you find a low-quality source, either replace it with higher-quality ones or jank the content if it doesn't warrant inclusion in the first place. The WP:RSP list, User:SuperHamster/CiteUnseen and User:Headbomb/unreliable are some of the best tools available to detect bad sources, though remember to use your own judgement as well.
- Copyedit the text and make sure that the text looks more Wikipedia-like. If in doubt, take a look at Wikipedia:Basic copyediting, Wikipedia:Writing better articles, WP:Manual of Style and more.
If you had completed all of these basic techniques, here are some of the more specialized yet powerful ways that you can improve Vital articles. Enjoy these dishes with extra Wikipedia:Ignore all rules and common sense:
- Use the bold, revert, discuss cycle to garner attention and quickly adding improvements the (old) Wikipedia way. This method is especially useful for editing popular country articles provided that you're prepared. Just make an edit that you think it would improve the article, the edit then gets reverted, and both people discuss to reach a better solution.
- Use AutoWikiBrowser and other automated tools to quickly correct errors in many Vital articles. For example, you can use AWB to monitor typos and fix them accordingly. Detailed instructions for some tools such as WP:PetScan and user scripts can be obtained at Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles/Tools.
- Import good content from subtopic articles. For example, in a section about the properties of numbers, it may be helpful to get the content from smaller scope articles such as natural numbers. However, you will need to attribute the source per Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and can be pretty tedious when messing with the template. An IAR and simpler way might be to make a talk page section and list all of your articles that you've copied, including their oldid.
- And perhaps, the most spicy of 'em all is using large language models such as ChatGPT, GPT-3, etc. for brainstorming ideas on Wikipedia. These neural networks as of 2023 are one of the most powerful tool to face the writer's block and give clues at expanding broad-topic articles, and they have the potential to do far more in the future. It should NOT, however, be used to generate original content because of original research and verifiability policy. For tips on using large language models, see Wikipedia:Using neural network language models on Wikipedia and Wikipedia:Large language models.
Awards
editWe have a good roster of awards given to those that help us advance the goal to make all Vital Articles GAs and FAs. These awards may be awarded by anyone to anyone worthy.
Barnstars
edit{{subst:Vital Barnstar|1=message ~~~~}}
– good old barnstar, given to those that have done a good job.
Vital Barnstar | ||
{{{1}}} |
{{subst:The Vital Articles Barnstar|1=message ~~~~}}
The Vital Articles Barnstar | ||
{{{1}}} |
Userboxes
edit- {{User Vital}} – for members of the project.
This user contributes to Vital Articles on Wikipedia. |
- {{Vital userbox}} – good old userbox, given to those that have done a good job.
This user has received a Vital barnstar. |
- {{Good Vital infobox}} – Userbox for those that have successfully nominated a Vital good article.
This user has helped promote vital good articles on Wikipedia. |
- {{Featured Vital infobox}} – Userbox for those that have successfully nominated a Vital featured article.
This user has helped promote vital featured articles on Wikipedia. |
Assessment
editFor mobile readers, you can click here to switch to desktop mode to read the table more easily. This Vital article assessment scheme is meant to be subjective and complementary to Wikipedia:Content assessment.
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article is professional, complete, engaging, and has been vetted by WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
|
Experts and casual readers alike will find the content easy to digest, accurate, and engaging. You can format the article to look like an actual Nature journal article and it would look believable. | Improve the prose, update the information, remove vandalism, make the text more professional and engaging, all the WikiGnome stuff! Try to make the text more readable and engaging to a wider audience if you dare. | Solar System |
A | The article is well organized, complete in terms of content, and has been examined by a dedicated WikiProject department such as WikiProject Military History A-class assessment. As a special assessment rank, it meets the A-Class criteria. The actual criteria can be slightly different due to nuances within individual WikiProjects. | Readers will find it complete, but experts will know better and still have grumbling at missing/incorrect information throughout the article. There will still be hiccups or typos when you read the article top-down. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need to be addressed. Consider contacting experts at your relevant A-Class department for more advice. | Napoleon |
GA | The article is reasonably complete and suitable for translation to other languages, after being vetted WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
|
Fairly standard quality level for a top-tier Encyclopædia Britannica article but with less generalization and dumb-downness. Readers will at least not be drowned in text, and experts will find it usable for refreshing their memory. | Detect Wikipedia:Systemic bias in the article and address them; more viewpoints generally meant better article at this point. Touch-up on your citations and style and make sure the text is in line with your sources. Make sure that the text is appealing to a wide audience and not a slog to read. | Marie Curie |
B | The article is kinda complete, reliable and suitably organized. From this point on, there is no need to revamp the article layout. More detailed criteria
It meets the six B-Class criteria:
|
"Seems good", a reader thought. Citations, prose and images are better than average, but lots of cruds still remain. Experts would likely look elsewhere for content, maybe at a specialist encyclopedia or journal articles if they need answer to specific questions. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. Start addressing systematic bias since this article will be translated to other languages and the inclusion of media should be considered as well. | Atom |
C | The article is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. It may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. It may have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance, or flow; or contain policy violations, such as bias or original research. | When a reader scrolls down, they would see a vast amount of text no more useful than at a random website, with no coherent theme, and dumpster fire of terrible sources. "This article could be better" – they thought. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organization. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Food preservation |
Start | The article sorely lacks content, and lacks a lot of it. The article has a usable amount of good content but is weak in many areas. Quality of the prose may be distinctly unencyclopedic. | Readers find it just a bit more useful than a dictionary definition, and experts will scoff on it. And they would definitely not read more than the lead portion of the article. | Find sources and add content based on them. Make sure that you make the article structure easy to expand upon. Think about a general "theme" or "flow" to the article – what do you want it to look like? | Equation |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic that needs a ton of content expansion. The article will need much work to become a meaningful article. | "Ah yes, that thing exists on Wikipedia" – a reader thought. Then they close Wikipedia and search on Google to hunt down more reliable/comprehensive content. | Add content like there's no tomorrow. Keep doing it. Add more content! | Rapids |
Dashboard
editArticle alerts
editFor article alerts about a specific level, see:
For article alerts on all vital articles (levels 1–5):
Today's featured articles
- 10 Oct 2024 – To Kill a Mockingbird (talk · edit · hist) will be Today's Featured Article; see blurb
- 07 Oct 2024 – Thunderbirds (TV series) (talk · edit · hist) will be Today's Featured Article; see blurb
- 04 Oct 2024 – Olmec colossal heads (talk · edit · hist) will be Today's Featured Article; see blurb
- 28 Sep 2024 – Igor Stravinsky (talk · edit · hist) will be Today's Featured Article; see blurb
- 27 Sep 2024 – Ethics (talk · edit · hist) will be Today's Featured Article; see blurb
Today's featured article requests
- 02 Nov 2024 – Daniel Boone (talk · edit · hist) has been proposed for Today's Featured Article by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
Did you know
- 30 Aug 2024 – Maximiliano Hernández Martínez (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by PizzaKing13 (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Aug 2024 – Serekunda (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for DYK by Vigilantcosmicpenguin (t · c); see discussion
Redirects for discussion
- 26 Sep 2024 – Łódź 1 (talk · edit · hist) →Łódź was RfDed by Schützenpanzer (t · c); see discussion
- 25 Sep 2024 – Disobedience (talk · edit · hist) →Civil disobedience was RfDed by Tamzin (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Sep 2024 – God of the New Testament (talk · edit · hist) →Jesus was RfDed by Fayenatic london (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Sep 2024 – $0.50 (talk · edit · hist) →50 Cent was RfDed by LilianaUwU (t · c); see discussion
- 22 Sep 2024 – Sinicized Southeast Asia (talk · edit · hist) →Vietnam was RfDed by Tavix (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Sep 2024 – Death and state funeral of Maumoon Abdul Gayoom (talk · edit · hist) →Maumoon Abdul Gayoom was RfDed by MPGuy2824 (t · c); see discussion
- 19 Sep 2024 – Bruce Weber (reporter) (talk · edit · hist) →The New York Times was RfDed by Utopes (t · c); see discussion
- 19 Sep 2024 – And I think to myself: 'What a wonderful world.' (talk · edit · hist) →What a Wonderful World was RfDed by Utopes (t · c); see discussion
- 19 Sep 2024 – I take seven kids from Columbine, stand 'em all in line, add an AK-47, a revolver, a nine (talk · edit · hist) →The Marshall Mathers LP was RfDed by Utopes (t · c); see discussion
- 19 Sep 2024 – I said a hip, hop, the hippie the hippie to the hip hop, and you don't stop (talk · edit · hist) →Rapper's Delight was RfDed by Utopes (t · c); see discussion
- (39 more...)
Files for discussion
- 21 Sep 2024 – File:Suraiya in the film 'Char Din' opposite Shyam in 1949.jpg (talk · edit · hist) (on 1, 2, 3) was FfDed by Explicit (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Sep 2024 – File:Metropolis (1927).webm (talk · edit · hist) (on Metropolis (1927 film)) was FfDed by Andrzejbanas (t · c); see discussion
Featured article candidates
- 23 Sep 2024 – Otto Hahn (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by Hawkeye7 (t · c); see discussion
- 03 Sep 2024 – My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by Kyle Peake (t · c); see discussion
- 01 Sep 2024 – Jochi (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by AirshipJungleman29 (t · c); see discussion
- 23 Aug 2024 – The Motherland Calls (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by Joeyquism (t · c); see discussion
- 06 Aug 2024 – Algebra (talk · edit · hist) was FA nominated by Phlsph7 (t · c); see discussion
- 16 Sep 2024 – Charles Edward Stuart (talk · edit · hist) FA nominated by Coldupnorth (t · c) was not promoted; see discussion
Featured topic candidates
- 12 Jul 2024 – 2008 Summer Olympics (talk · edit · hist) was FT nominated by Hey man im josh (t · c); see discussion
A-Class review
- undated – Ernest J. King (talk · edit · hist) was put up for A-Class review
- undated – Yuna Kim (talk · edit · hist) was put up for A-Class review
Good article nominees
- 26 Sep 2024 – Balto (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Nathan Obral (t · c); start discussion
- 25 Sep 2024 – Rabbit (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Reconrabbit (t · c); start discussion
- 19 Sep 2024 – Pikachu (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Pokelego999 (t · c); start discussion
- 12 Sep 2024 – Dark chocolate (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Rollinginhisgrave (t · c); see discussion
- 11 Sep 2024 – Piri Reis (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Rjjiii (t · c); start discussion
- 09 Sep 2024 – Matthew Webb (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by It is a wonderful world (t · c); see discussion
- 05 Sep 2024 – Serekunda (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Vigilantcosmicpenguin (t · c); start discussion
- 29 Aug 2024 – Arrow's impossibility theorem (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Closed Limelike Curves (t · c); start discussion
- 26 Aug 2024 – Terbium (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Reconrabbit (t · c); start discussion
- 24 Aug 2024 – Centrism (talk · edit · hist) was GA nominated by Thebiguglyalien (t · c); start discussion
- (22 more...)
Featured article reviews
- 06 Sep 2024 – Heavy metal (elements) (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by Ldm1954 (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Sep 2024 – E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by TenPoundHammer (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Sep 2024 – Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 27 Aug 2024 – The Notorious B.I.G. (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by TechnoSquirrel69 (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Jun 2024 – Middle Ages (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by Borsoka (t · c); see discussion
- 24 May 2024 – Sun (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by 750h+ (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Feb 2024 – Edward I of England (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by JimKillock (t · c); see discussion
- 17 Feb 2024 – Mariah Carey (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by ScarletViolet (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Jan 2024 – Emmy Noether (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 30 Oct 2023 – Byzantine Empire (talk · edit · hist) was put up for FA review by SandyGeorgia (t · c); see discussion
- (1 more...)
Good article reassessments
- 25 Sep 2024 – Council of the European Union (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 25 Sep 2024 – George W. Bush (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Sep 2024 – Jeopardy! (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by TenPoundHammer (t · c); see discussion
- 14 Sep 2024 – Wicked (musical) (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Sep 2024 – British Airways (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 25 Aug 2024 – Battle of Plataea (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 23 Aug 2024 – Battle of the Yarmuk (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 12 Jul 2024 – Mary McLeod Bethune (talk · edit · hist) was nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Sep 2024 – Hezbollah (talk · edit · hist) nominated for GA reassessment by It is a wonderful world (t · c) was closed; see discussion
- 14 Sep 2024 – Giselle (talk · edit · hist) nominated for GA reassessment by Z1720 (t · c) was closed; see discussion
- (2 more...)
Requests for comments
- 26 Sep 2024 – Lady Gaga (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Natemup (t · c); see discussion
- 25 Sep 2024 – Sheikh Hasina (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Gotitbro (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Sep 2024 – Julian Assange (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Jack Upland (t · c); see discussion
- 17 Sep 2024 – Donald Trump (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by RCraig09 (t · c); see discussion
- 14 Sep 2024 – History of Transylvania (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Slatersteven (t · c); see discussion
- 13 Sep 2024 – 1948 Palestinian expulsion and flight (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Amayorov (t · c); see discussion
- 08 Sep 2024 – Hubble's law (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Banedon (t · c); see discussion
- 07 Sep 2024 – Elon Musk (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by ElijahPepe (t · c); see discussion
- 05 Sep 2024 – Jinn (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Louis P. Boog (t · c); see discussion
- 04 Sep 2024 – Indian National Congress (talk · edit · hist) has an RfC by Helper201 (t · c); see discussion
- (3 more...)
Peer reviews
- 28 Aug 2024 – Oregon (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by SouthParkFan65 (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Aug 2024 – River (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by ForksForks (t · c); see discussion
- 17 Aug 2024 – Rwandan genocide (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Randomstaplers (t · c); see discussion
- 16 Aug 2024 – Sher Shah Suri (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Noorullah21 (t · c); see discussion
- 06 Aug 2024 – Charles the Bold (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Amir Ghandi (t · c); see discussion
- 06 Aug 2024 – Metaphysics (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Phlsph7 (t · c); see discussion
- 25 Jul 2024 – Kronosaurus (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Amirani1746 (t · c); see discussion
- 22 Jun 2024 – Brown bear (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Wolverine XI (t · c); see discussion
- 30 May 2024 – Chinese characters (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by Remsense (t · c); see discussion
- 03 Apr 2024 – Campbell's Soup Cans (talk · edit · hist) has been put up for PR by TonyTheTiger (t · c); see discussion
Requested moves
- 25 Sep 2024 – Maize (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Zea mays by Indefatigable2 (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Sep 2024 – ...Baby One More Time (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to ... Baby One More Time by Shhhnotsoloud (t · c); see discussion
- 24 Sep 2024 – Maratha Confederacy (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Maratha Empire by Crashed greek (t · c); see discussion
- 23 Sep 2024 – Cork (city) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Cork, Ireland by JuniperChill (t · c); see discussion
- 23 Sep 2024 – Fédération Internationale d'Escrime (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to International Fencing Federation by Pelmeen10 (t · c); see discussion
- 22 Sep 2024 – Dixieland jazz (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Traditional jazz by Marisauna (t · c); see discussion
- 22 Sep 2024 – Republic of China (1912–1949) (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Republican China by Remsense (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Sep 2024 – Squanto (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Tisquantum by Ezra Fox (t · c); see discussion
- 13 Sep 2024 – Flood control (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Flood management by Ahecht (t · c); see discussion
- 12 Sep 2024 – Iranian Revolution (talk · edit · hist) is requested to be moved to Iranian revolution by Cinderella157 (t · c); see discussion
- (11 more...)
Articles to be merged
- 25 Sep 2024 – Splint (medicine) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Orthotics by Rui Gabriel Correia (t · c); see discussion
- 13 Sep 2024 – Decision theory (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Rational choice theory by Buidhe (t · c); see discussion
- 13 Sep 2024 – Rational choice theory (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Decision theory by Buidhe (t · c); see discussion
- 03 Sep 2024 – Urinal (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Pissoir by Stultiwikia (t · c); see discussion
- 02 Sep 2024 – Drainage (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Storm drain by The Blue Rider (t · c); see discussion
- 27 Jul 2024 – Street dog (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Free-ranging dog by Stultiwikia (t · c); see discussion
- 27 Jul 2024 – Free-ranging dog (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Street dog by Stultiwikia (t · c); see discussion
- 18 Jul 2024 – Loss function (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Scoring rule by Closed Limelike Curves (t · c); see discussion
- 12 Jul 2024 – Lightning strike (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Lightning by 177.102.177.112 (t · c); see discussion
- 17 May 2024 – Open-source software (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for merging to Free and open-source software by Buidhe (t · c); see discussion
- (9 more...)
Articles to be split
- 17 Sep 2024 – Illinois (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Patrickneil (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Sep 2024 – Light-emitting diode (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Thumperward (t · c); see discussion
- 15 Sep 2024 – Sadomasochism (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Redrose64 (t · c); see discussion
- 01 Sep 2024 – Chrysler (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Adriazeri (t · c); see discussion
- 30 Aug 2024 – Life (magazine) (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Jayediting (t · c); see discussion
- 27 Aug 2024 – Octahedron (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Dedhert.Jr (t · c); see discussion
- 21 Aug 2024 – John Russell, 1st Earl Russell (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Altonydean (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Aug 2024 – Robert Peel (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Altonydean (t · c); see discussion
- 20 Aug 2024 – Harold Wilson (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Altonydean (t · c); see discussion
- 17 Aug 2024 – Horror film (talk · edit · hist) is proposed for splitting by Andrzejbanas (t · c); see discussion
- (90 more...)
Click to watch (Subscribe via RSS Atom) · Find Article Alerts for other topics!
Statistics
editVital pages by quality | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | |||||||
Total | |||||||
FA | 1,246 | ||||||
FL | 11 | ||||||
A | 29 | ||||||
GA | 2,438 | ||||||
B | 12,414 | ||||||
C | 18,767 | ||||||
Start | 13,929 | ||||||
Stub | 875 | ||||||
List | 105 | ||||||
NA | 3 | ||||||
Assessed | 49,817 | ||||||
Unassessed | 9 | ||||||
Total | 49,826 | ||||||
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 192,118 | Ω = 3.87 |
See also
edit- Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles/Article alerts – specialized noticeboard for Vital articles
- File:Wikipedia’s poor treatment of its most important articles.pdf (2011)
- File:Fun or Functional? The Misalignment Between Content Quality and Popularity in Wikipedia (WMF Research Showcase 2015-09-16).pdf
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Vital Articles/Readability (2016)