Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zachari Logan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:58, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zachari Logan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any sources independent of the subject, and most of the article consists of a list of his works. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 18:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Canada. Grumpylawnchair (talk) 18:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep. Article looks promo, but I can find enough coverage about him. The first is rather small [1], the rest are better [2], [3] and [4] Oaktree b (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I doubt CBC articles about "Future 40" subjects can be considered independent secondary coverage and say too much about notability, "Future 40" is a contest about promising subjets under the age of 40 from the Saskatchewan province in which every candidate gets coverage in the website. Looking at the winners I see a lot of people who merit appreciation but are in the end low-profile individuals in terms of encyclopedic value. I see participation in such a contest more as a sign that you are not notable rather than the other way around. Also this profile was written by the subject himself, and is apparently copied word for word from his own website. This page seems to me a clear case of WP:TOO SOON. Cavarrone 06:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep numerous works in public collections, prestigious shows and residencies. The article should be rewritten in less pretentious manner Hermann Heilner Giebenrath (talk) 11:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, easily meets inclusion if the numerous exhibitions, museum holdings, and references are to be believed. And per Hermann Heilner Giebenrath. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I was able to verify another collection. He meets criteria 4 of WP:NARTIST. The article should be kept. Netherzone (talk) 14:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I cleared out the CV aspects of the article and hope it is more encyclopedic now. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 21:13, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:ARTIST and WP:GNG. Covered in Boston Globe, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The StarPhoenix, etc. APK whisper in my ear 09:17, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.