KuwarOnline

{{unblock reviewed | 1=Wow!!! what is this? I am really blocked on doubts without any concrete proof. I was busy with personal life since I moved to NYC. I did saw notice once, but I was sure people here are not dumb to block people out of thin air just on doubts unless there is concrete proof so I didnt bother much and I had faith in people here. But looks like you proved me wrong. I hope you have done full analysis before you blocked me, about my contributions or any past issue?. I dont work for anyone nor I get paid or anything like it. I do it here to help little bit nothing more than that. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:KuwarOnline|<font color="#007FAA"><b>KuwarOnline</b></font>]]'''<b>^{[[User talk:KuwarOnline|<font color="#C12283">'''Talk'''</font>]]}</b> </span> 02:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC) | decline = You haven't addressed the true issue for your block: the sockpuppetry concerns.[[User:Only|only]] ([[User talk:Only#top|talk]]) 13:51, 7 July 2017 (UTC)}}

 

That is an inaccurate read of what was written. The reason why there is no CU evidence against you is because the check was run before you were mentioned in the case and considering that you are viewed as an undisclosed, paid editor which amounts to meatpuppetry here, there is no reason to run another CU to compare you with those accounts. Arguably, one might be run now to see if you have other accounts outstanding. You were blocked based on behavioral evidence and among other things your deleted contribs are telling. Another admin had picked you out independently without knowing that I had indeed identified you.<br />&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">Berean Hunter</span>]] [[User talk :Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">(talk)</span>]] 16:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

* I dont have any issue for running any kind of investigation on my account, I very well aware of meatpuppertry. I m here nearly more than decade now. When I come across new things happening around and its notable. I do create page for that e.g. [[Force One (Mumbai Police)]] or [[Eastern Freeway (Mumbai)]] If visit some place and I do some research over if page is not there and its it meet guidelines I do create page to make sure it is building block for future user to contribute and make it more readable. Just like when I visited Category:Companies_based_in_Mumbai I thought let make it extensive and did some research to create pages I started contributing towards it. Then one day I saw Category:Expressways in India and found that its not extensive even though there are so many expressways in India, I started expanding that category I created nearly 13-14 pages for that and updated many more whose pages were already there. then I started to update tallest building in India I created 13 pages and updated numerous pages. Even after doing so many things people like you treat user this way I dont think its encouraging here. You should be very thorough and have extreme proof before you make such claims and block decade old editors who are here to help grow wikipedia. Instead of scaring away editors we should be encouraging them while keeping policies enforced for highest quality. Sad to see this though <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> '''[[User:KuwarOnline|<font color="#007FAA"><b>KuwarOnline</b></font>]]'''<b>^{[[User talk:KuwarOnline|<font color="#C12283">'''Talk'''</font>]]}</b> </span> 18:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)