Deepin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
→‎History: No bold.
KaiMartin (talk | contribs)
Line 105:
Deepin's reputation was that it had relatively high CPU and memory demands when it was still based on GTK and HTML technologies, even when the system was idle.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/deepin-15-4.html|title=Deepin 15.4 review – All that glitters is not gold|website=www.dedoimedo.com|access-date=2019-05-10}}</ref> After switching to the Qt-based desktop environment, performance improved, as was noted by Linux.com in its September 2018 review of Deepin 15.7.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.linux.com/learn/intro-to-linux/2018/9/deepin-linux-gorgeous-it-user-friendly|title=Deepin Linux: As Gorgeous As It Is User-Friendly|date=2018-09-21|website=Linux.com {{!}} The source for Linux information|language=en|access-date=2019-05-10}}</ref>
 
=== Western concerns about connections to China ===
[[Radware]]'s head of threat research has commented on concerns about analytics collected by Deepin, and whether these are sent to the Chinese government: while the CNZZ analytics service has been removed, analytics are still collected, now by "Umeng+".<ref name=":3" /> According to cybersecurity lawyer Steven T. Snyder, due to the sheer size of Deepin's codebase, it is impossible to really scrutinize all the code comprising it to be sure the Chinese government doesn't have backdoors.<ref name=":3" /> The project does remain fully [[Open-source software|open source]] allowing anyone to review, modify or change the code to meet their standards.<ref>{{cite web|title=Wuhan deepin Technology Co., Ltd.|url=https://github.com/linuxdeepin|access-date=2021-12-07|website=GitHub|language=en}}</ref>