Bibliography
R. B. Angell,Reasoning and Logic, New York 1963.
P. Benacerraf, ‘What Numbers Could Not Be’,Philosophical Review 74 (1965) 47–73.
R. Carnap,Meaning and Necessity, Chicago 1947, 2nd ed., 1956.
D. Carney and K. Scheer,Fundamentals of Logic, New York 1964.
A. Church, ‘A Formulation of the Logic of Sense and Denotation’, inStructure, Method, and Meaning (ed. by P. Henle, M. Kallen, and S. K. Langer), New York 1951.
A. Church, ‘On Carnap's Analysis of Statements of Assertion and Belief’,Analysis 10 (1949–50) 97–99.
A. Church, Review of Quine's ‘Notes on Existence and Necessity’,Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (1943) 45–47.
G. Frege, ‘On Sense and Reference’, originally published inZeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100 (1892) 25–50; translated inTranslations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege (ed. by P. Geach and M. Black), Oxford 1960.
K. J. Hintikka, ‘Individuals, Possible Worlds, and Epistemic Logic’,Noûs 1 (1967) 33–62.
D. Kaplan,Foundations of Intensional Logic (Dissertation), University Microfilms, Ann Arbor 1964.
H. S. Leonard,An Introduction to Principles of Right Reason, New York 1957.
W. V. Quine, ‘Notes on Existence and Necessity’,The Journal of Philosophy 40 (1943) 113–127.
W. V. Quine, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’,Philosophical Review 60 (1951) 20–43; reprinted in [15].
W. V. Quine, ‘Notes on the Theory of Reference’, in [15].
W. V. Quine,From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass., 1953, 2nd ed., 1961.
W. V. Quine, ‘Three Grades of Modal Involvement’, inProceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy, Brussels, 1953, Vol. 14, pp. 65–81, Amsterdam; reprinted in [20].
W. V. Quine, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’,The Journal of Philosophy 53 (1956) 177–187; reprinted (minus 15 lines) in [20].
W. V. Quine,Word and Object, New York 1960.
W. V. Quine, ‘Reply to Professor Marcus’,Synthese 13 (1961) 323–330; reprinted in [20].
W. V. Quine,The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays, New York 1966.
P. F. Strawson,Individuals, London 1959.
A. Tarski, ‘The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages’, originally published in Polish inPrace Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego, Wydzial III, no. 34 (1933), pp. vii + 116; translated in A. Tarski,Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics, Oxford 1956, pp. 152–278.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is intended as a commentary on Quine's ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’. Quine's article was first published in 1956 and I have been thinking about it ever since. Quine has not been idle while I have been thinking, but his subsequent writings do not seem to have repudiated any part of ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’ which remains, to my mind, the best brief introduction to the field. The first half of my reflections was read to the Harvard Philosophy Colloquium in January 1966. Its writing was aided by conversations with Montgomery Furth. The present ending has been influenced by a number of different persons, most significantly by Saul Kripke and Charles Chastain. But they should not be held to blame for it. Furth, who also read the penultimate version, is responsible for any remaining deficiencies aside from Section IX about which he is skeptical. My research has been partially supported by N.S.F. Grant GP-7706.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaplan, D. Quantifying in. Synthese 19, 178–214 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00568057
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00568057