Skip to main content
Log in

The logic of ability, freedom and responsibility

  • Published:
Studia Logica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to offer a rigorous explication of statements ascribing ability to agents and to develop the logic of such statements. A world is said to be feasible iff it is compatible with the actual past-and-present. W is a P-world iff W is feasible and P is true in W (where P is a proposition). P is a sufficient condition for Q iff every P world is a Q world. P is a necessary condition for Q iff Q is a sufficient condition forP. Each individual property S is shown to generate a rule for an agent X. X heeds S iff X makes all his future choices in accordance with S. (Note that X may heed S and yet fail to have it). S is a P-strategy for X iff X's heeding S together with P is a necessary and sufficient condition for X to have S. (P-strategies are thus rules which X is able to implement on the proviso P).Provisional opportunity: X has the opportunity to A provided P iff there is an S such that S is a P-strategy for X and X's implementing S is a sufficient condition for X's doing A. P is etiologically complete iff for every event E which P reports P also reports an etiological ancestry of E, and P is true. Categorical opportunity: X has the opportunity to A iff there is a P such that P is etiologically complete and X has the opportunity to A provided P. For X to have the ability to A there must not only be an appropriate strategy, but X must have a command of that strategy. X steadfastly intends A iff X intends A at every future moment at which his doing A is not yet inevitable. X has a command of S w.r.t. A and P iff X's steadfastly intending A together with P is a sufficient condition for X to implement S. Provisional ability: X can A provided P iff there is an S such that S is a P-strategy for X, X's implementing S is a sufficient condition for X's doing A, and X has a command of S w.r.t. A and P. Categorical ability: X can A iff there is a P such that P is etiologically complete and X can A provided P. X is free w.r.t. to A iff X can A and X can non- A. X is free iff there is an A such that X is free w.r.t. A.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Tichý, A new theory of subjunctive conditionals, Synthese 37 (1978), pp. 433–457.

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Tichý, The logic of temporal discourse, Lingusitics and Philosophy 3 (1980), pp. 393–369.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Tichý, The semantics of episodic verbs, Theoretical Linguistics 7 (1980), pp. 263–296.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Tichý, Foundations of partial type theory, Reports on Mathematical Logic 14 (forthcoming).

  5. P. Tichý and G. J. Oddie, Ability and Freedom, The American Philosophical Quarterly (forthcoming).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oddie, G., Tichý, P. The logic of ability, freedom and responsibility. Stud Logica 41, 227–248 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370346

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370346

Keywords

Navigation