Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tehran - Iran.jpg

Enwiki duplicate tagged as non-free with different sourcing.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:49, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My File is from a free source, that's why I use this correct license. Do you read this license? What the en-wiki does, is not our problem. Kept -- How (talk) 18:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source stated as unknown - so how do we know that the file was first published in the US between the necessary dates and without a copyright notice?Nigel Ish (talk) 08:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Read the Article about Mason Remey! He was an american Bahá'í and died 1974. So what? -- How (talk) 09:48, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete: Lack of source in the file description means there is no evidence this work was first published anywhere but the United States, and no evidence this work was published without a copyright notice between 1923 and 1977. Copyrighted until the end of 2044 (Mason Remey's death + 70 years) unless proven otherwise. (In reality, How uploaded an identical copy of the file en:File:Bahai how tehran.jpg, where it is tagged as fair-use, with a big red copyright symbol and the words "This work is copyrighted". ("Do you read this license?") That file description also says the picture was published in a copyrighted 1974 book, with no evidence of prior non-copyright publication. In any case, whether you check en-wiki or not, there is no evidence the work is out of copyright.) --Closeapple (talk) 07:34, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep What happend, if there is a correct free file at de:wp and a nonfree at en:wp? You'll delete the correct file? Really? Do you read the article about Mason Remey and the book?! Sfan00 IMG has own problems with files, so he's not allowed to mark other files! Do you know en:Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point? -- How (talk) 08:14, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  No, one deletes the incorrect upload, which (in this case) is File:Tehran - Iran.jpg on Commons, because it is nonfree and Commons does not have fair use exceptions. (en.wiki may still use it there, but only uploaded directly on en.wiki while it is used for en.wiki articles, because the file is restricted to fair use. Recently someone said "What the en-wiki does, is not our problem.") I don't know Sfan00 or his images; regardless of who or what he is, this nomination is not "disrupting Wikipedia", especially since he appears to be right because File:Tehran - Iran.jpg appears to be copyright. Why do you keep saying to read the article? There is no evidence in Mason Remey about it being published without a copyright message. There is also no evidence in the file description of it being published without a copyright message. It's a U.S. work by a person who has been dead less than 70 years. --Closeapple (talk) 10:18, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

•  KeepRead the book and show us the copyright-tag, before you talking about! -- How (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete License states it was published between "1923 and 1977" but there is no publication date given neither a source is. de.wiki dup is deleted. --Saibo (Δ) 21:44, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

•  KeepWhats going on? Mason Remey dies 1974 in the USA, so he can't paint this file 1980! de:wp has no license-tag like this, so thats no reason. -- How (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note the difference between create and publish. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 16:19, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here that's the same, he can't publish the file after 1974! -- How (talk) 06:44, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]