User talk:Kazimier Lachnovič

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--Legobot^Operator_talk 22:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Kazimier Lachnovič!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Sciah sviatoha Jura.svg is uncategorized since 7 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:57, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:City Hall of Mаhiloŭ 1.JPG is uncategorized since 3 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Former Cloister of Holy Trinity, Minsk-1.JPG is uncategorized since 5 April 2009.
• Image:Traeсkaje suburb.JPG is uncategorized since 5 April 2009.
• Image:Coat of Arms of Janavičy.gif is uncategorized since 8 April 2009.
• Image:Pcič river.jpg is uncategorized since 5 June 2009.
• Image:Laher-Smalenskaj-Šlachty.jpg is uncategorized since 25 July 2009.
• Image:Stańkаŭ, Napaleon Orda.jpg was uncategorized on 7 September 2009.
• Image:Catholic church of SS. Peter and Paul in Vialiž.jpg was uncategorized on 10 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Ihnat Damiejka (silver coin, revers).png was uncategorized on 26 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−

It has been found that Image:Catholic Church in Białyničy, Napaleon Orda.jpg has a deprecated license tag. Please choose a new free license tag which describes the rights of the image correctly otherwise it will be deleted!Thanks for your consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 16:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Church_of_Saint_Casimir,_Mаhiloŭ.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Беларусы._Biełarusy._Belarusians.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Justass (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Трэба дадаць спасылкі на файлы, зь якіх створаны каляж. Wizardist (talk) 22:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Дзякуй! Зараз як раз іх зьбіраю. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for providing the source for images you used in collage. But some of them are nor {{PD-old}} nor covered by {{PD-BY-exempt}}. http://www.belarus.by/rel_image/1098 is from belarus.by website where all content is marked as copyrighted. http://vsu.by:8081/web_index/news/yakub_kolas/index.html is from the middle of last century and come from the website marked as © 2007 Бiблiятэка ВДУ. Файл:Olga-Korbut.jpg is uploaded to ru wiki under fair use rationale, Commons does allow fair use. Please replace or remove them. Thank you --Justass (talk) 22:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explanation, I replaced all questionable files. Is everything ok now? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you --Justass (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Map Of Menskaja Voblasc.svg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Map Of Menskaja Voblasc.svg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:22, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:58, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Street_in_Masty.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

 

Rubin16 (talk) 13:00, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mikałaj_III_Radzivił._Мікалай_III_Радзівіл.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mikałaj_III_Radzivił._Мікалай_III_Радзівіл.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Evalowyn (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This engraving was created by unknown author in 17th century. It's obvious {{PD-old}}. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just give the URL of the source. It would be enough. No one wants this image to be deleted as well. Wizardist (talk) 00:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

На жаль, яно перастала працаваць. Калі выдаляць - нічога страшнага, усё адно я імя трохі пераблытаў (гэта насамрэч Войцех-Адальбэрт Радзівіл). Як сайт той запрацуе - загружу пад новым імём або папрашу перанесьці існую выяву. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 00:59, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Выяву можаш і сам перанесьці. :) Wizardist (talk) 01:03, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Здаецца, усё ж не магу сам (прынамсі такога пунтка ў мэню ня бачна), звычайна зьвяртаюся па гэта да EugeneZelenko. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 01:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Пасьля зоркі ідзе стрэлка, наводзіш на яе і там выкідное мэню. Voila. Wizardist (talk) 20:50, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Для выяваў (File:) у маім мэню толькі пункты: Global usage - Find categories - Log - Purge - en. Мабыць, у цябе больш правоў. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To oczywisty błąd w Wilanowie. To dziecinny portret Józefa Sapiehy (1737-1792). Zofia Zielińska w haśle w Polskim Słowniku Biograficznym pisze o dziecinnych portretach pędzla Mirysa. pozdrawiam Mathiasrex (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This file is being used in w:Livonian War, which is up for featured article nomination. The reviewers require a thorough source for images - to prevent copyright problems and the like - and I was wondering if you could provide this on the file page? Things like where the information came from and the map data; if these aren't in the public domain or under a suitable licence then this could be problematic. What does "NN" mean? Thanks. Grandiose (talk) 16:23, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added more precisely file description and suppose that now all should be correct. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 21:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:55, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Вітаю. Заўважыў, што вы пэрманэнтна дадаеце новыя файлы ў катэгорыю. Выдатна, але я тут зь нядаўняе пары вырашыў разгрэсьці завалы, у якіх усё адно патрэбны файл знайсьці было немагчыма, ды пачаў разносіць малюнкі ў падкатэгорыі паводле населеных пунктаў. Дык было б добра, каб вы правяралі, ці ня створаная ўжо катэгорыя па тым населеным пункце, малюнкі якога вы зьбіраецеся запампаваць, і калі так, то дадаваць файлы менавіта ў тую падкатэгорыю. Да таго ж можа стацца, што такі файл тамака ўжо існуе. :)

Ну а па-другое, якім чынам вы пераймяноўваеце файлы, цікава? ;) --Renessaince (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаньне і дзякуй за ўпарадкаваньне катэгорыяў, бо ў асноўнай, сапраўды, назіраецца пэўная перагружанасьць. Буду надалей імкнуцца да больш дэталёвай катэгарызацыі. Што датычыцца зьмяненьня назваў файлаў, то існуе адмысловая старонка Commons:Requests for rights#Filemover, дзе трэба зьмясьціць запыт (можна паводле аналёгіі зь іншымі) на правы Filemover'а. Здаецца, у вас ужо дастаткова рэдагаваньняў. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 14:41, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Выдатна, калі дапаможаце ва ўпарадкаваньні. А ў такім разе як лічыце, ці варта яшчэ стварыць катэгорыі-пасярэднікі (паміж асноўнай і катэгорыямі паводле н. п.) для малюнкаў Орды паводле краінаў? То бок усе сучасныя беларускія населеныя пункты дадаць у катэгорыю Category:Paintings of Belarus by Napoleon Orda‎ і да т. п.? Таму што ўжо цяпер падкатэгорыяў 69, і гэта яшчэ далёка не мяжа. --Renessaince (talk) 14:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

На маю думку, шмат падкатэгорыяў - гэта ня так страшна, як шмат выяваў :) Усё ж, дзякуючы ўпарадкаванасьці назваў, арыентавацца ў такім выпадку значна прасьцей. Таму глядзіце самі, ці варта ствараць катэгорыі-пасярэднікі для краінаў. Засмучвае хіба той факт, што ў часы стварэньня работаў сучасных граніцаў не існавала. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:14, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Не жадаеце заняцца запампоўкай? Мяне пакуль хапіла толькі на Пружану, і толькі на першую старонку. --Renessaince (talk) 07:46, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Дзякуй за спасылку. У мяне тут такая пазыцыя: запампоўка гэта, вядома, добра, аднак яшчэ лепей, каб запампаванае адразу ж ішло ў артыкулы, бо з уласнага назіраньня - рэдкі паспаліты чытач ідзе у commons па дадатковыя файлы. Дарэчы, на наступных старонках памянёнага рэсурсу шмат якія паштоўкі зь першай паўтараюцца, таму ў будучыні можна будзе ўсё хуценька загрузіць. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:39, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Так, гэта ўсё зразумела. Адно толькі блага, што гэта онлайн-аўкцыён, а яны, як вядома, маюць асаблівасьць сканчацца ці быць выкупленыя… --Renessaince (talk) 06:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Як варыянт, найбольш цікавыя паштоўкі можна сьцягнуць сабе на дыск. Але мне падалося, што менавіта на тым аўкцыёне, у адрозьненьні ад allegro.pl, яны захоўваюцца даволі працяглы час. У кожным разе, я імкнуся ставіцца да ўсяго гэтага па-філязофскі: не пасьпеў - значыць, іншым разам пашчасьціць :) --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 13:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Мої шанування! Завантажений вами файл насправді є портретом данціґського міщанина з відомого сайту. --Bulka UA (talk) 22:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Вітаю! Шкода, але це дійсно не Заславський. Виправив назву файлу, опис та посилання. Дякую, що написали. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 23:12, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Padśville. Падсьвільле (XX).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Polarlys (talk) 23:35, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sievierščyna._Севершчына_(1676).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

80.94.166.169 12:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Biahomiel. Бягомель (10.07.2009).jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 13:56, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

И верно, цвет портретов изменился, но перемены связаны не с тем, что позировали покойники, а с тем, что белый цвет стал белым вместо желтого, увы, но это общее свойство старых картин (они желтеют, и чем старше - тем желтее), кроме того большинство сканирующих систем искажают цвета, что тоже следует учитывать. "Естественный" загар не изображался на картинах - персонажей писали с выбеленными, т.е. красивыми лицами. Корректура цвета производилась типовая (без обрезания гистограммы, что не приводило к потере графической информации) в результате которой выравнивался черный цвет (он утрачивал оттенки и становился черным), а также белый цвет, который утрачивал желтизну (т.е. дефицит синего и частично зеленого цвета), см. File:Hanna Prušynskaja (Kamaroŭskaja). Ганна Прушынская (Камароўская).jpg, File:Stanisłaŭ Prušynski. Станіслаў Прушынскі (XVIII).jpg. Но это исторические портреты. Но есть исторические марины и пейзажи, см. File:Trafalgar1.jpg, File:Santodomingo.jpg, на которых (если Вы посмотрите их прежние неисправленные версии) тоже все было желтым, лазурное море и синее небо были бурыми. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:01, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Разумеется, что Ваши дополнительные усилия по коррекции цветовой гаммы я могу только приветствовать. Что касается "омолаживания" - прежняя, неомоложенная версия продолжает оставаться доступной в истории файла. Естественно, что некоторые цветовые эффекты могут и должны быть, увы, результатом разности настоек мониторов. Но, подчеркиваю, я гистограмму не обрезал, потому ни один оттенок не был потерян, а потому всегда возможна дальнейшая коррекция. А вот вопрос о том, на сколько корректно улучшать цифровое изображение - это серьезный вопрос. Для себя я решил его так: изображения лучшего качества имеют большую познавательную, иллюстративную и потому энциклопедическую ценность. Ведь посмотрите, сколько цифровых преобразований было произведено над File:Miensk. Менск (XIX, II).jpg? Я вот со своей стороны попытался решить непростую задачку устранения муара - и, честно говоря, принял решение оставить этот муар на своем месте (преобразовав, естественно, из цветного в grayscale). Но существующий вариант также приемлем. Кстати, только сейчас вспомнил, что недели две назад в качестве избранного на Коммонз было номинировано изображение Джоконды, с которого были убраны все трещинки (что, согласитесь, еще большее "омоложение", не так ли?). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:02, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Да, и еще вопрос: есть вот такое изображение 1700x2961 pix есть ли смысл грузить его как альтернативу File:Janusz Radziwiłł (1612–1655).jpg? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Да, я не мог не заметить то, что недостатки письма стали заметнее, но (если следовать этой логике), то чем хуже качество файла, то тем меньше заметны дефекты картины (трещины, засветы, тени, недостатки художественного письма). И о гамма-коррекции: разумеется ее приходится делать для каждой спектральной полосы отдельно, но уже после отсечения пустых участков гистограммы (слева и справа). Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Да я тоже предполагал, что многопиксельная версия хуже той, что была Вами загружена как ее альтернатива. Но я хотел, чтобы Вы подтвердили мое мнение - я попытался что-то сделать с многопиксельной версией и пришел к выводу, что вариант без изначального муара (продукта сканирования полиграфической репродукции) все же предпочтительнее.
    • Что касается [1] - то это не "удачная цветокоррекция", а полное ее отсутствие. Изображение темное, тени не читаются. И оно, естественно, "желтое". Понимаю, что гепатитные лица, руки, воротники, платки, документы, паруса, облака и пр. являются привычными, однако такая цветовая гамма, увы, не позволяет судить о том, каков был цвет одеяний, драпировок и пр. Именно информативность таких изображений минимальна, как мне думается. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:06, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • Да нет же никакого "эталона белизны лиц": просто расширяется гистограмма на весь диапазон - и только-то. То есть максимальные значения гистограммы устанавливаются на 255, а минимальные на 0 в каждой спектральной полосе. В результате белесый цвет лиц проявляется сам (как облаков на пейзажах). Тут не ставится задача "выбелить лица" - результат в свое время меня самого удивил, хотя в ряде случаев лица все равно не белые. Гамма-коррекция производилась для того, чтобы повысить яркость теней, проявить детали в тенях изображения. Но делалось это осторожно, так как усиление яркости могло бы спровоцировать исчезновение деталей в светлой части гистограммы.
      • Что касается недавно отреставрированного портрета, пример которого Вы приводите. Белыми на нем являются лебедь в гербе, а не лицо. Но лицо розовато-телесного цвета, а не желтое. Только не следует путать гистограммные преобразования с реставрацией, не стоит обижать художников-реставраторов и сравнивать их с ремесленниками от гистограмм. Если же все же говорить о гистограмме - то там максимальные значения приходятся на самые яркие части картины, но это не лицо, а герб. Только эти самые яркие части и могут быть белыми, не так ли? Теперь о том цвете, который Вы считаете белым на исходнике File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл.jpg - увы, но это обман тренированного мозга, это не белый, а желтый цвет (посмотрите в любом графическом редакторе, который позволяет читать спектральные коды пикселей), но который мозг велит воспринимать как "практически белый" только потому, что мозг ожидает для этой детали изображения именно белого цвета (я о плюмаже, естественно). Но еще раз повторю - настройки монитора могут тут влиять на восприятие. Единственное, что скажу, это то, что т.н. скорректрованный вариант не менее белый, чем исходный. А по мне так и более белый. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Я пользуюсь программой IRas/C, но это сугубо профессиональная американская программа у меня с работы. В обыденной жизни ее не встретить.
        • Что касается Фотошопа - при обрезании гистограммы правильнее всего отдельно собрать гистограмму с самого темного участка изображения (пусть и не очень большого) и обрезать до самого темного, также поступить и с белым - надо выбирать самый яркий участок картинки. При этом следует учитывать, что, скажем, ярко красное епископское одеяние или какой-нибудь бант в своей спектральной зоне может быть самым ярким. На одном из изображений я собирал гистограмму с ярких рефлексов на декорации булавы. При этом всегда надо проверять по лицу - чтобы не появились монотонные участки на лице - это делает его неинформативным и плоским. Вообще появление монотонных участков на изображении должно настораживать - значит что-то не то было сделано.
        • Теперь о Вашем первом опыте - "разумеется, что Ваши дополнительные усилия по коррекции цветовой гаммы я могу только приветствовать", я уже Вам об этом говорил. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 05:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
          • Вернулся с дачи весь в аллергии. Я не в Фотошопе работаю, потому по фотошопу я не спец. Но в тех программах, в которых я работаю, есть возможность получить гистограмму произвольной области изображения (как обойти это ограничение в Фотошопе - может надо тщательнее его изучить, а может достаточно скопировать интересующий участок в отдельный слой и взять гистограмму для него, а по ней определить точные границы динамического диапазона для основного изображения).
          • Относительно "потери информации" - потеря (разрушение) информации происходит при неверном обрезании гистограммы (выборе динамического диапазона таким, что часть оттенков в самой яркой части и в самой темной части изображения утрачиваются �� заменяются соответственно 255 или 0). Изменение "среднего" значения, которое и задает кривизну передаточной функции (а по умолчанию она просто линейная) - процесс более творческий и как следствие - не всегда объективный (в частности из-за свойств конкретного монитора, на котором Вы или я наблюдаем результат), но по настоящему следует признать, что творческая процедура восстановления колорита без нелинейных преобразований обойтись не может. Но возьмете ли Вы на себя такую смелость? Вам решать.
          • Я уже вполне ясно выразил свое отношение - если Вами созданный вариант лучше, то, естественно, его и следует загрузить. Мы же для людей стараемся, а не для удовлетворения каких-то личных амбиций. Я (да и все мы) моue только приветствовать конструктивную помощь. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 15:26, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
            • Sure. Мне на днях даже приходилось ревертировать чрезмерные цветокоррекции. Вы, естественно, в полном праве поступать аналогичным образом, либо предлагать собственные цветокоррекции взамен сделанных мною. Вы сами, полагаю, решите то, где следует ревертировать, где улучшить. (Вот одна из последних моих загрузок File:Eldar Gasimov 2011 cropped.jpg - цветокоррекция была совершенно необходима. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 14:15, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Усё-ткі не даюць мне спакою вось гэтыя выявы: File:Haradziec-pałac.jpg і File:Haradziec. Гарадзец (J. I. Krašeŭski, XIX).jpg пяра, так бы мовіць, «рыцара пяра». Ці вы ўпэўненыя на ўсе 100%, што на іх сапраўды выяўлены палац у вёсцы Кобрынскага раёну? Ня ведаю, ці бываў там Крашэўскі… А вось у вёсцы на Валыні ён некалькі рокаў мешкаў у гасьцёх і тамака ж вянчаўся. Не памятаю дзе, але пры жаданьні можна адшукаць у інтэрнэце згадкі, што гэтыя выявы ўсё ж напісаныя з палацу ва ўкраінскай вёсцы. А яшчэ раней сустракаў, здаецца, нават іхнюю атрыбуцыю да маёнтку Крашэўскага ў Гарадку, але тады адкінуў быў гэтую вэрсію як памылковую. Цяпер жа ўжо перакананасьці наконт Кобрыншчыны паменшала. --Renessaince (talk) 16:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Цяпер ня ўпэўнены. Увогуле, зьвесткі пра тое, што гэта наш палескі Гарадзец я ад пачатку ўзяў адсюль і адсюль. Трэба высьвятляць. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Здесь явно много того, что может Вас заинтересовать. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:38, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, действительно очень хороший источник. Пользовался, пока было время. Сейчас там вроде технические работы — может, после их завершения еще что-нибудь интересное выложат... --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 14:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 23:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vilnia. Вільня (1604).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Фото каплицы, подписанное как "Лахва", скорее всего, изображает каплицу в Кожан-Городке.

Старое фото каплицы в "Википедии": http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%81achva._%D0%9B%D0%B0%D1%85%D0%B2%D0%B0_(S._Bochnig,_XX).jpg

Фото 2007 г. на "Глобусе Беларуси": http://globus.tut.by/kozhan-gor/roadch_gallery.htm (Если внешние ссылки запрещены местными правилами, зайдите, пожалуйста, на сайт "Глобус Беларуси", в разделе "Брестская область" выберите "Кожан-Горожок", пролистайте соотв. страницу до "часовня придорожная" и нажмите на ссылку "Фотогалерея".)

Вероятно, то же самое относится и ко второй каплице: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%C5%81achva._%D0%9B%D0%B0%D1%85%D0%B2%D0%B0_(S._Bochnig,_1929).jpg На "Глобусе Беларуси" см. в Кожан-Городке "часовня правосл. св. Симеона Столпника".

Действительно, первая часовня очень похожа. Но привязку к Лахве дает сама Fototeka Instytutu Historii Sztuki UJ (http://www.fototeka.ihs.uj.edu.pl/navigart/navigart/select?id=search&content=%C5%81achwa). В любом случае, спасибо за информацию. Было бы неплохо проработать вопрос и наверняка определить локализацию снимков. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you please explain why are you uploading files from different sources in some strange names? It would be fair to use English version if not the original (as named in the webpage), e.g. why a painting of a Lithuanian Castle from Polish website should be named in be-tarask? BurgererSF (talk) 16:40, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]