User talk:Leechjoel9: Difference between revisions

Please review MOS:IMAGELOCATION and WP:GALLERY.--Moxy 🍁 01:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In general, when working with images:

DO: Review the image style guide and use policy. Give context with captions and alt text. Try to find at least one image for each article. Find free images, or create and upload your own. Clean up images: crop, color-correct, etc. Use the best file format for each image. Use objects for scale where helpful. Place images in the section to which they are related

DON'T: Don't upload non-free images. Don't use images in place of tables or charts. Don't use images or galleries excessively. Don't add images that are not relevant. Don't flip faces, text, or works of art. Don't set fixed image sizes. Don't sandwich text between two images. Don't refer to images by their placement.

I have read MOS:IMAGELOCATION and WP:GALLERY. I have not edited or added any more images on the article. The UNSESCO image gallery for Asmara has been on the article for months and is added in context to the topic, it is not used excessively. The world heritage site for Asmara includes ALL of Asmara, the city in its entirety is listed as a world heritage site. Therefore the gallery with some images of the buildings are suitable for the article. Leechjoel9 (talk) 09:44, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It causes unbalance...3 sentences gets 7 images? Looks like the most important thing in the country is buildings...not its people, culture or history. WP:WEIGHT "Undue weight can be given in several ways, including but not limited to depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, juxtaposition of statements and use of imagery. --Moxy 🍁 11:56, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you still edit warring, Leechjoel9, while not having engaged the dispute on the article talk page? That is where such a discussion belongs. So, you need to do that or you are likely to face sanctions. Please also observe WP:ONUS, which reads: the onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content. El_C 17:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have adressed it the involved party. Moxy edited the last version I restored to. I Will engange in the discussion as mentioned on talk page of Moxy, we agreed that something has to be done about the image gallery on the article, the user also tagged the gallery to adress the issue. I Will adjust and adress it on the talk page of the article. Leechjoel9 (talk) 21:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering why you reverted the minor formatting fix I'd previously installed at Eritrea. Can I restore it? Thanks! Eelworm (talk) 18:30, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Asmara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Gunter.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Template:Z187 Gooduserdude (talk) 09:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tigrayans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tigre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello friend. Please consider discussing the Tigrayan vs Tgrinyan issue at the article's talk page. Talk:Tigrayans In general, edit warring on Wikipedia is bad, and we do not want to have problems with WP:3RR. Thank you. –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tigrayans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tigre.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman Catholic Diocese of Lydda and Ramla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eritrea&type=revision&diff=997651129&oldid=997641386

Why do you believe that it is inappropriate to give the name of Eritrea's only legal political party and the name of Eritrea's first and only President in the lead section of the Eritrea article? DeathTrain (talk) 16:18, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did not oppose to write that it was the first and only president and the name of political party, Ill add that again. The problem was that sentence before explained pretty much the same. I rewrote first sentence and added correct description of the type of government it has. Leechjoel9 (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the second time - please do not make links like this per WP:OVERLINK. If you continue to make edits like this then you could be blocked, as your edits could be considered disruptive and you could be viewed as lacking competence to edit. GiantSnowman 19:43, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I note that, in addition to my reverts and post on your talk page earlier today, @AtticTapestry: has also reverted you citing OVERLINK here. GiantSnowman 19:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have notice you are editing warring if wish to discuss about the map feel free. However it is not a dubious map, as you know the extension of the empire is what you see on that map. - Rogeman123 Rogeman123 (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Boud. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.Template:Z186 This edit by you was contrary to the talk page consensus. On a sensitive page like this, you should check the talk page before editing, unless your edits are clearly uncontroversial. Boud (talk) 23:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Boud (talk) 23:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]