User talk:Solavirum: Difference between revisions

Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, could you please explain the source you've cited here? It doesn't seem to be related to the Dadivank (aka Khutavank) monastery but is refering to an Albanian monastery apparently named "Khudavan", which i couldn't find on Google by the way. LevonAUS9 (talk) 17:03, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LevonAUS9, the Azerbaijani government and historians claim that Dadivang is a Caucasian Albanian monastery. That might cause the confusion. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 17:07, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, i'm aware of that. Is the name "Khudavan" a new one among the media as well? Because a search for "Khudavan" on Google literally gets you this aznews.com piece you'e cited in the article. I'm sure you can do better with the sources, please avoide citing sources using non existent names next time. Have a good one. LevonAUS9 (talk) 17:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

LevonAUS9, its just a misspelling. You can find many sources about that development. Here's one without the misspelling. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 18:00, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. PhJ (talk) 21:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Steverci (talk) 01:12, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Solavirum. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--HistoryofIran (talk) 15:08, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nakhchivan Garrison, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nakhchivan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:42, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There seem to be a pattern of disruptive editing by you in articles related to Armenia

• [[1]]
• [[2]]
• [[3]]
• [[4]]

Addictedtohistory (talk) 08:26, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

Addictedtohistory, and who are you to call them disruptive? See our discussion at Shusha talk page. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 10:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No reason for biing WP:PA. I'm WP editor. It has nothing to do with Shushi. You've been adding azeri names to cities in Republic of Armenia, under pretext that at some point it had also azeri population. There are cities in Russia, with significant azeri population, so what? Addictedtohistory (talk) 12:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, see the discussion we had about Shusha. You'll get the idea. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 12:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[[5]] [[6]]--Addictedtohistory (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Addictedtohistory (talk • contribs) 12:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[[7]] Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Addictedtohistory (talk • contribs) 15:00, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I even trying to explain? --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 15:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misusing the guidelines and falsely giving warning to others is also against the rules, let me remind you that. None of the comments by me referred to your personal life, or anything personal actually. In every comment, I've referred to your worrying edits. If you feel like your publicly published edits are somehow personal to you, that's your problem, not ours. If anything bugs you out, you can always ask for a third opinion. --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 15:30, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Solavirum, rather than continue to revert the changes regarding the number of casualties please only engage in discussion on the talk page so that blocks aren't necessary. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did that though --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 11:37, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know, I'm saying keep doing it until there's a solution. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:05, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Link to the dispute Regards, Armatura (talk) 23:32, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Shusha (2020) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Haydar Pamuk -- Haydar Pamuk (talk) 14:41, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

. Direct link about the discussion on Operation Iron Fist Regards (Armatura (talk) 00:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)).[reply]

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:00, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anar Novruzov has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't see significant coverage that would satisfy WP:GNG. His rank is not sufficient to satisfy WP:SOLDIER

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dumelow (talk) 08:59, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Military units and formations of the First Nagorno-Karabakh War requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:47, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Steverci (talk) 01:19, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not set categories up until there are at least 10 members and going to be at least 20, with articles still to be created. A regiment would simply go in the Az land forces category and category Category:Infantry regiments. Happy New Year!! Buckshot06 (talk) 05:29, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, got it. Thanks for the heads-up and happy new year! --► Sincerely: SolaVirum 05:57, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please tell me what does CE mean? I know people use it to indicate that they corrected spelling mistakes but don't know its meaning.--Visnelma (talk) 12:33, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Solavirum, I appreciate your work within the Azerbaijan-Armenia topic area and wanted to offer some advice. With the greatest respect, if you can't see how Aliyev's statement isn't applicable for the lead of Nagorno-Karabakh conflict (after I've now highlighted the policies to you) I suggest you step back a bit, have a quick (re-)read through the explanatory supplement on advocacy (it's not a long page) and reflect on how it may be hard for you to write neutrally on this topic. I'm not suggesting that there aren't pro-Armenian editors who find it equally difficult to write neutrally, or denying that there are other editors who are more disruptive because of their biases in this area – I'm not questioning your good faith. However, I think it's important that everyone with close ties to the topic understands this difficulty and tries to recognise when their actions are preventing them from writing sufficiently neutrally. All the best, Jr8825 • Talk 13:50, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]