Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyceum of Alabang: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by Nintendo2000 - "manually signed and timestamped replies, see revision history to verify"
mNo edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


*What else do you need that I could provide so it won’t be deleted?? [[User:Wikinerd881|Wikinerd881]] ([[User_talk:Wikinerd881|talk]]) 03:51, 1 February 2023
*What else do you need that I could provide so it won’t be deleted?? [[User:Wikinerd881|Wikinerd881]] ([[User_talk:Wikinerd881|talk]]) 03:51, 1 February 2023
**manually signed/timestamped [[User:Nintendo2000|Nintendo2000]] ([[User talk:Nintendo2000|talk]]) 04:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)


*And I didn’t create the page necessarily because of Celeste Cortesi [[User:Wikinerd881|Wikinerd881]] ([[User_talk:Wikinerd881|talk]]) 03:56, 1 February 2023 <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nintendo2000|Nintendo2000]] ([[User talk:Nintendo2000#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nintendo2000|contribs]]) </small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
*And I didn’t create the page necessarily because of Celeste Cortesi [[User:Wikinerd881|Wikinerd881]] ([[User_talk:Wikinerd881|talk]]) 03:56, 1 February 2023
**manually signed/timestamped [[User:Nintendo2000|Nintendo2000]] ([[User talk:Nintendo2000|talk]]) 04:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:20, 1 February 2023

Lyceum of Alabang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability criteria for schools (WP:NSCHOOL). The most coverage one can find is two news articles that briefly mention it as the school of Miss Universe winner Celeste Cortesi (WP:INHERITORG - an organization does not "inherit" notability from its member). Nintendo2000 (talk) 19:30, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. [...] The depth of coverage of the subject by the source must be considered. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject is not sufficient to establish notability. Deep or significant coverage provides an overview, description, commentary, survey, study, discussion, analysis, or evaluation of the product, company, or organization. Such coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond brief mentions and routine announcements, and makes it possible to write more than a very brief, incomplete stub about the organization.

Nintendo2000 (talk) 03:36, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]