User talk:Soxwon

26 September 2024
In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws" Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections? Gallery: Are Luddaites defending the English Wikipedia? Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Please stop sending me stuff about my pages i created, I'm not done with them yet. for example, dont put anymore stuff about fixing the Hanashiro Chomo page because I'm still working on it. [1]

Hello, Soxwon. You have new messages at QueenofBattle's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Soxwon. You have new messages at Tide rolls's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Soxwon. You have new messages at Jojhutton's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You mean the Goa Mix?  :) Click the email me link and I'll be glad to help. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 21:42, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I've seen you around editing some of Queen's articles. Would you consider becoming a member of Queen WikiProject, a collaborative effort which works to improve the coverage of Queen related articles on Wikipedia? If you're interested, join us!

I have reported your continued edit warring. //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 23:33, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Glenn Beck has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.   — Jeff G.  ツ 02:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Soxwon, LegitimateAndEvenCompelling has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks. I see you are reverting or otherwise editing regarding some of Badger Drinks mass reverts of my many MMfA WP:RS edits. I also see you are doing so for legitimate (and even compelling) reasons other than WP:RS. If you wish to give me advice on improving the basis for my MMfA edits, I'm all ears. Thanks again. --LegitimateAndEvenCompelling (talk) 04:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So why are you insisting on unilaterally closing the discussion when you yourself initiated the thread? Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was mulling over doing an RFC on all those sources. Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 06:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that Fox News will come after me personally? Donald Schroeder JWH018 (talk) 06:07, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soxwon, I've started the RfC regarding MMfA, MRC, FAIR, Newsbusters etc. Please continue to participate on the Reliable Sources Talk page here. Skoal. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 21:24, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soxwon, please don't even consider this. From my limited memory, it seems like you do good work around here. I have the climategate scandal, er, controversey, er, event, er, thingy that took place, on my watchlist, don't know why, since I wouldn't touch that crap with a 100 foot pole. That has to be by far the most disputed, fought over mess, I have ever seen. It makes I/P editors look like chummy friends. Anyways, my I suggest you step back from that mess and not watch it for one week. I bet if you return, absolutely nothing will have changed or have gotten done. Talk about ground hog day, all over. Anyways, feel free to delete this and tell me to go soak my head :) Cheers! --Tom (talk) 14:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I've looked at your previous edits and i have to say you're one of the few editors I've seen in a while who can edit things with a NPOV tone (way better than me haha...but I'm trying). Keep up the good work buddy. JahnTeller07 (talk) 22:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, JahnTeller07 has been indefinitly blocked as a sock puppet of a banned user. - SummerPhD (talk) 19:30, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Preciseaccuracy#Couldn.27t_help_notice_your_post_on_Jimbo.27s_page... Preciseaccuracy (talk) 20:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I do not work for nor am at all involved with DailyKOS nor any of its writers and contributors. I merely wanted it to be on record that News Corporation, Fox News Parent Company, had recently donated $1 million to the Republican Governors Association. The New York Times reported the story on August , despite other news sources reluctance to do so. I made no reference to Rupert Murdoch. I cited my source from the New York Times own website. You moved the notation to a different (and I would AGREE) more relevant section of the Fox News page. Then you deleted it. I put it back. You've deleted it again. Hmmmm. I noticed that you've been reported for edit warring before, so I'm reinserting this without discussion because the fact of this donation is notItalic text in dispute. Why should we have to 'discuss' facts that are not in dispute? If you are going to remove it, I believe you owe all of us who read and care about the future of Wikipedia and the free and transparent communication of facts and knowledge an explanation for this deletion. While I agree that the continued vandalism of Wikipedia by both sides of the aisle is counterproductive, I disagree that anyone should rmove simple statements of facts because they think them unimportant.