Jump to content

Wage labour: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 43: Line 43:
*[[Labour theory of value]]
*[[Labour theory of value]]
*[[Marx's theory of alienation]]
*[[Marx's theory of alienation]]
*[[Marxian economics]]
|
|
*[[Marxian economics]]
*[[Mode of production]]
*[[Mode of production]]
*[[Reserve army of labour]]
*[[Reserve army of labour]]
*[[Rate of exploitation]]
*[[Rate of exploitation]]
*[[Surplus value]]
|
|
*[[Surplus value]]
*[[Unfree labour]]
*[[Unfree labour]]
*[[Wage]]
*[[Wage]]
*[[Working poor]]
*[[Working poor]]
|
*[[Wage slavery]]
*[[Wage slavery]]



Revision as of 22:57, 13 March 2012

Wage labour (or wage labor) is the socioeconomic relationship between a worker and an employer, where the worker sells their labour under a formal or informal employment contract. These transactions usually occur in a labour market where wages are market determined.[1][2] In exchange for the wages paid, the work product generally becomes the undifferentiated property of the employer, except for special cases such as the vesting of intellectual property patents in the United States where patent rights are usually vested in the original personal inventor. A wage labourer is a person whose primary means of income is from the selling of his or her labour in this way.

In modern mixed economies such as those of the OECD countries, it is currently the dominant form of work arrangement. Although most work occurs following this structure, the wage work arrangements of CEOs, professional employees, and professional contract workers are sometimes conflated with class assignments, so that "wage labour" is considered to apply only to unskilled, semi-skilled or manual labour.

Types

The most common form of wage labour currently is ordinary direct, or "full-time", employment in which a free worker sells his or her labour for an indeterminate time (from a few years to the entire career of the worker), in return for a money-wage or salary and a continuing relationship with the employer which it does not in general offer contractors or other irregular staff. However, wage labour takes many other forms, and explicit as opposed to implicit (i.e. conditioned by local labour and tax law) contracts are not uncommon. Economic history shows a great variety of ways in which labour is traded and exchanged. The differences show up in the form of:

  • employment status: a worker could be employed full-time, part-time, or on a casual basis. He could be employed for example temporarily for a specific project only, or on a permanent basis. Part-time wage labour could combine with part-time self-employment. The worker could be employed also as an apprentice.
  • civil (legal) status: the worker could for example be a free citizen, an indentured labourer, the subject of forced labour (including some prison or army labour); a worker could be assigned by the political authorities to a task, he could be a semi-slave or a serf bound to the land who is hired out part of the time. So the labour might be performed on a more or less voluntary basis, or on a more or less involuntary basis, in which there are many gradations.
  • method of payment (remuneration or compensation). The work done could be paid "in cash" (a money-wage) or "in kind" (through receiving goods and/or services), or in the form of "piece rates" where the wage is directly dependent on how much the worker produces. In some cases, the worker might be paid in the form of credit used to buy goods and services, or in the form of stock options or shares in an enterprise.
  • method of hiring: the worker might engage in a labour-contract on his own initiative, or he might hire out his labour as part of a group. But he may also hire out his labour via an intermediary (such as an employment agency) to a third party. In this case, he is paid by the intermediary, but works for a third party which pays the intermediary. In some cases, labour is subcontracted several times, with several intermediaries. Another possibility is that the worker is assigned or posted to a job by a political authority, or that an agency hires out a worker to an enterprise together with means of production.

Criticisms

The first point of criticism is on the freedom of the worker. Wage-labour societies emerged from removing the alternative means of self-sustainment used previously by peasants. Historically, whenever people had their own land to cultivate—as was the case for most of the population in pre-industrial England, colonial Kenya,[3] colonial Australia, or colonial Namibia[4]—they did not commit to work for an employer. In such cases, laws were promulgated to expel peasants from their lands, and to make the price of the land artificially high so that a common person would have to work an entire lifetime to buy it.

The second point of criticism is that after people have been compelled by economic necessity to no feasible alternative than that of wage labour, exploitation occurs; thus the claim that wage labor is "voluntary" on the part of the labourer is considered a red herring as the relationship is only entered into due to systemic coercion brought about by the inequality of bargaining power between labor and capital as classes.

The worker is kept in a condition of mere survival, while the wealth produced by his or her work goes to the employer. Also, the technological progress which increases productivity is not used to reduce the work time and improve the quality of life of the worker; instead, it is used entirely to increase the profit of the employer. The employer who buys this labour power as if it were a commodity owns the labour process and sells the products to make profit. On the other hand, the worker sells their creative energy and their liberty for a given period, and are alienated from their own labour, as well as its products.

Wage labour is often criticized as "wage slavery" by socialists and most anarchists. They see wage labour as a major, if not defining, aspect of hierarchical industrial systems. In Marxist terminology, wage labour is defined as "the mode of production where the worker sells their labour power as a commodity",[5] (and a wage labourer is one who sells their labour power.)

Some opponents of capitalism compare wage labour to slavery (see wage slavery). For example, Karl Marx said "The slave, together with his labour-power, was sold to his owner once for all... The [wage] labourer, on the other hand, sells his very self, and that by fractions... He [belongs] to the capitalist class; and it is for him... to find a buyer in this capitalist class."

While most opponents of wage labor blame the capitalist owners of the means of production for its existence, most anarchists and libertarian socialists also hold the state as equally responsible as it exists as a tool utilized by capitalists to subsidize themselves and protect the institution of private ownership of the means of production - which guarantees the concentration of capital among a wealthy elite leaving the majority of the population without access.

Most opponents of the institution support worker self-management and economic democracy as alternatives to both wage-labor and to capitalism.

See also

Notes

  1. ^ Deakin & Wilkinson 2005.
  2. ^ Marx 1847, Chapter 2.
  3. ^ Elkins 2005, Chapter 1.
  4. ^ Olusoga & Erichsen 2011, pp. 100–1.
  5. ^ Marx, Karl. Wage Labour and Capital

Bibliography

  • Deakin, Simon; Wilkinson, Frank (2005), The Law of the Labour Market: Industrialization, Employment, and Legal Evolution, Oxford: University Press, ISBN 978-0-198-15281-1
  • Elkins, Caroline (2005), Britain's Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya, London: Pimlico
  • Olusoga, David; Erichsen, Casper W (2011) [2010], The Kaiser's Holocaust: Germany's Forgotten Genocide, London: Faber and Faber, ISBN 978-0-571-23142-3
  • Marx, Karl (1847), Wage Labour and Capital