User:Duae Quartunciae/sandbox: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:16, 15 November 2009

Talk page response with named groups of references

Sometimes people make long rambling replies in which they bring up a whole swag of points, each of which needs a distinct response.^{[resp 1]}

Here, for example, they might include an insult.^{[resp 2]}

And after that, on they go with another unrelated point.^{[resp 3]}

You can give a general overview response as per usual, followed by the grouped reflist. It should appears as a numbered response, with clickable links to jump between comment and response:

^ Neutral^{[reresp 1]} response can be made pointwise using grouped ref tags.
^ This isn't an insult, of course.^{[reresp 2]} It is just a hypothetical.
^ Except these points are not unrelated; they all relate to named groups of references.

Adios

Doing it a second time is tricky, and requires teh #tag magic word. Details at WP:FOOTNOTE.

^ That is, with a pH of 7.
^ Although this is, because it is implying you are not smart enough to figure it out for yourself.^{[resp3 1]}

You can keep doing it!

^ Don't be silly!^{[resp4 1]}

On and on it goes....

^ I'm not. I need to do this to explain multiply nested groups.^{[resp5 1]}

Until eventually, it is all just too confusing and it's not even clear why we bother.

^ Oh.

[2] Neutral^{[reresp 1]} response can be made pointwise using grouped ref tags.

[7] This isn't an insult, of course.^{[reresp 2]} It is just a hypothetical.

[8] Except these points are not unrelated; they all relate to named groups of references.

[1] That is, with a pH of 7.

[6] Although this is, because it is implying you are not smart enough to figure it out for yourself.^{[resp3 1]}

[5] Don't be silly!^{[resp4 1]}

[4] I'm not. I need to do this to explain multiply nested groups.^{[resp5 1]}

[3] Oh.

[resp 1]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Sometimes people make long rambling replies in which they bring up a whole swag of points, each of which needs a distinct response.<!--response as ref-->{{#tag:ref|Neutral<ref group="reresp">That is, with a pH of 7.</ref> response can be made pointwise using grouped ref tags.|group="resp"}}
-Here, for example, they might include an insult.<!--response as ref--><ref group="resp">This isn't an insult, of course. It is just a hypothetical.</ref>
+Here, for example, they might include an insult.<!--response as ref-->refThis isn't an insult, of course. It is just a hypothetical.
 And after that, on they go with another unrelated point.<!--response as ref--><ref group="resp">Except these points are not unrelated; they all relate to named groups of references.</ref>
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 :: Doing it a second time is tricky, and requires teh #tag magic word. Details at [[WP:FOOTNOTE]].
 <div style="margin-left:3em"><references group="reresp" /></div>
+::: You can keep doing it!
+<div style="margin-left:5em"><references group="resp3" /></div>
+:::: On and on it goes....
+<div style="margin-left:7em"><references group="resp4" /></div>
+::::: Until eventually, it is all just too confusing and it's not even clear why we bother.
+<div style="margin-left:9em"><references group="resp5" /></div>